Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Rite Aid of New Jersey, Inc. v. Board of Pharmacy

    63 N.J. 503 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1973

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • O'Keefe v. Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement System

    131 N.J.L. 502 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1944

    Hackensack Trust Co. v. Hackensack, 116 N. J. L. 343, 346; 184 Atl. Rep. 408 ; Fedi v. Ryan, 118 N. J. L. 516, 517; 193 Atl. Rep. 801 ; Antonelli v. Newark, 128 N. J. L. 531, 532; 27 Atl. … Herod v. Mutual Chemical Co., 115 N. J. L. 369, 372; 180 Atl. Rep. 432 ; Public Service Co-ordinated Transport v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 115 N. J. L. 97, 103; 178 Atl. Rep. 550 ; Ott v. Braddock, 119 N. J.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

    79 N.J.L. 454 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1910

    Colonial Trust Co. v. Scheffey (par curiam); Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization of Taxes, 49 Vroom 302 . … Colonial Trust Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matturi v. Board of Trustees of the Judicial Retirement System

    167 N.J. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 2001

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Santa Cruz v. Board of Review, Department of Labor & Industry

    126 N.J. 312 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Emmanuel

    228 N.J. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deborah Jewish Consumptive Relief Society v. State Board of Health

    7 N.J. Misc. 418 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 19, 1929

    It is not the function of a writ of mandamus to compel the state board of health to perform an act already completed nor to do it in a different way than already done. … Uszkay v. Dill, 92 N. J. L. 327. At all events the power to issue a writ of mandamus is discretionary. Jones Co. v. Town of Gutlenberg, 66 N. J. L. 58. The application for the writ is denied.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    86 N.J.L. 696 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1914

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ackerman Fuel Oil Co. v. Board of Adjustment of Paramus

    136 N.J.L. 93 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 5, 1947

    In Burmore v. Smith, 124 N. J. … Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N. J. L. 183; Weisman v. Spoerer, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 731; Pieretti v. Johnson, 132 N. J. L. 576; Bronston v. Plainfield, 119 Id. 139.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Deborah Jewish Consumptive Relief Society v. State Board of Health

    7 N.J. Misc. 779 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1929

    The provisions of the act, so far forth as they relate to the determination of the state board, are as follows: “4. … At the time and place so fixed for said hearing the state board of health shall hear all parties, both for and against said application, and said board shall thereupon either grant or withhold the consent and approval asked

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF WESTFIELD

    24 N.J. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1957

    24 N.J. 465 (1957) 132 A.2d 558 CHARLES ALAN PHILLIPS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWN OF WESTFIELD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 10, 1957.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hillside Bus Owners Ass'n v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    106 N.J.L. 243 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1929

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Associates of Jersey Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    98 N.J.L. 250 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

    The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., PTo. 45, of the present term of this court (post p. 283).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Communipaw Central Land Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    98 N.J.L. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

    The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45 of the present term of this court (post p. 283).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Long Branch v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    128 N.J.L. 91 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 13, 1942

    The utility on November 14th, 1940, filed with the Board a schedule of increased rates effective as of January 1st, 1941. The Board suspended the proposed rate pending a hearing pursuant to N. J. S. … We can hardly say, however, that the Board’s findings have no support in the proofs. The Board considered all the proper elements. New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 123 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Atlantc City v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    128 N.J.L. 278 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 1942

    This court does not disturb the judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals on questions of fact unless the evidence is persuasive that the board erred in its determination. Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 N. J. … L. 174; affirmed, 123 Id. 200; Skouras Theatres Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 Id. 52.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dwight School of Englewood v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    117 N.J.L. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1936

    Examination of the proofs taken in this case leads us to the conclusion that it is controlled by the decision of this court in Carteret Academy v. State Board, 104 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Union Township Teachers Ass'n ex rel. Allen v. Board of Education

    90 N.J. 161 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1982

    Both the Association and the Board appealed to the Appellate Division. … Those issues have been decided this day in the case of Lavin v. Board of Education of Hackensack, 90 N.J. 145 (1982).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Second National Bank & Trust Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    114 N.J.L. 573 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 8, 1935

    Justice Swayze, in Commercial Trust Co. v. Hudson Board of Taxation, 86 N. J. … . *574 The county board must, from all the evidence, determine the true value of bank stock for purposes of taxation. The bank’s statement is not binding. Newton Trust Co. v. Atwood, 77 N. J. L. 141.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hudson County Bus Owners Ass'n v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    6 N.J. Misc. 1070 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 30, 1928

    The board of public utility commissioners held this revocation by the town of Secaucus was unlawful, and rightfully so as we think; under Pamph. … We are satisfied with the decision of the board of public utility commissioners, as set out in the printed book on pages 5 to 10.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.