Case law

M. & G. Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners

4 N.J. Misc. 864 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 21, 1926

Hench v. East Orange, 2 N. J. Mis. R. 510; Portnoff v. Bigelow, 133 Atl. Rep. 534 ; Long v. Scott, Id. 767; N. J. Land Co. v. East Orange, No. 237 of the present term.

Marlyn Realty Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 581 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1928

Burg v. Ackerman, 5 Id. 96. There is also a presumption that the action of the board of adjustment was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801. … This court will not distrub the action of the board of adjustment unless its action is shown by evidence to be wrong. Oxford Construction Co. v. Orange, 137 Atl. Rep. 545 .

State v. Lehigh Valley Terminal Railway Co.

55 N.J.L. 203 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1893

The-controversy in this case is over the strip-of land belonging to the city through which the Brown place sewer was in part constructed, and which the city, by a resolution passed by the board of street and water commissioners … The facts are set out in the opinion in the case of Jersey City v. The National Docks Ry. Co., supra.

State ex rel. Eggie v. Board of Commissioners

6 N.J. Misc. 1094 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 30, 1928

Schait v. Senior, 117 Atl. Rep. 517 ; Johnston v. Hague, 136 Id. 407; Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow, 134 Id. 557; Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. … Rem. 47; State v. Newark, 35 N. J. L. 396; Secaucus v. Kiesewetter, 83 Id. 227. The result is that the application for the writ will be denied.

Atlantic City Sewerage Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

100 N.J.L. 395 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1924

Smith-Pagan v. Board of Review, Department of Human Services

197 N.J. 258 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 12, 2008

962 A.2d 530 (2008) 197 N.J. 258 SMITH-PAGAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES. C-471 September Term 2008, 62,933 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 12, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

Heath v. Board of Managers of Jersey City Medical Center

92 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1983

Plaintiff seeks to recover back pay for a period during which her employer, the Board of Managers of the Jersey City Medical Center (Medical Center), erroneously denied her the employment position to which she was later held … The Commission relied in addition on Taylor v.

West Jersey & Seashore Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

8 N.J. Misc. 212 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 7, 1930

The board heard all the applications together and decided on a total of thirty-five buses, distributed as above stated. … Reams of paper have been filled with the testimony and' exhibits submitted to the board and briefs of counsel, but the ultimate points for decision are as usual quite simple.. Did the board have jurisdiction?

Camden County Realty Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

131 N.J.L. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 6, 1944

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Camden, 122 N. J. L. 270, 275; 4 Atl. Rep. (2d) 705. Cf. Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 129 N. J. L. 535, 538, 539 ; 30 Atl. … Rep. (2d) 325; Gannon v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra (at pp. 452, 453). Cf. Colonial Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N. J. L. 126; 18 Atl. Rep. (2d) 625.

Estate of Giordano v. Planning Board of Town of Kearny

196 N.J. 595 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 6, 2008

960 A.2d 392 (2008) 196 N.J. 595 ESTATE OF GIORDANO v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWN OF KEARNY. Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 6, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

Borough of Woodcliff Lake v. State Board of Tax Appeals

117 N.J.L. 114 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1936

City of Newark v. State Board of Tax Appeals

127 N.J.L. 524 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1942

The County Board dismissed the petition upon the ground that respondent’s chief office was not in Newark. After hearing, upon proper proofs submitted to it the State Board affirmed. City of Newark v. Sun Oil Co., 19 N. … See Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 119 N. J. L. 164; 194 Atl. Rep. 870 .

In re Brown

231 N.J. 166 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 2017

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-339, concluding that SALEEMAH MALIKAH BROWN of HACEKENSACK , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2008, should be censured for violating … making a false or misleading communication about the attorney's legal fee), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty), fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that SALEEMAH MALIKAH BROWN

North Jersey Newspapers Co. v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders

127 N.J. 9 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1992

In our recent decision in Techniscan Corp. v. … State v.

United New Jersey Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

101 N.J.L. 303 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 1925

Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 86 Id. 592; Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 82 Id. 21. … Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assesors, 89 Id. 108; affirmed, 90 Id. 701. Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 86 N. J. L. 592.

Stein v. PLANNING BOARD OF BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER

195 N.J. 518 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 2008

950 A.2d 905 (2008) 195 N.J. 518 STEIN v. PLANNING BOARD OF BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER. Supreme Court of New Jersey. May 6, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

City of Jersey City v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

130 N.J.L. 309 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 28, 1943

Eatontown v. Monmouth Electric Co., 75 N. J. L. 459, 462; Nixon v. Ruple, 30 Id. 58. … Morgan v. United States, 304 U. S. 1 ; 82 L. Ed. 1129 ; Redcay v. State Board of Education, 128 N. J. L. 281.

Borough of Florham Park v. Department of Health

7 N.J. Misc. 549 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1929

Corp. (5th ed.), § 521; Barnert v. Paterson, 48 N. J. L. 395; Oxford v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad, 64 Id. 195; Brown v. District of Columbia, 127 U. S. 579 ; United States v. Ballin, 144 Id. 1. … L. 395; Outwater v. Carlstadt, 66 Id. 510; Tappan v. Long Branch, 59 Id. 371. Since the action of the board was not properly taken, it is unnecessary to consider the other points raised.

Interstate Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

84 N.J.L. 184 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1913

Third Avenue Railroad Co. et al., v. Public Service Commission, 203 N. Y. 299 . … McGovern v. Board of Works, 28 Vroom 580 ; Colonial Trust Co. v. Scheffey (per curiam), 69 Atl. Rep. 455 . Bor these reasons we have concluded to refuse the writ of ;mandamus, and to dismiss the writ of certiorari.

New Jersey State Board of Optometrists v. S. S. Kresge Co.

113 N.J.L. 287 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 17, 1934

West Jersey and Seashore Railway Co. v. Public Utility Board, 87 N. J. L. 170. The prescribed “standard of conduct” is not, as contended, vague and indefinite. … Rogers v. Brown, 20 N. J. L. 119; Lanning v. Administrator of Lanning, 17 N. J. Eq. 228, 233. All doubt-should be resolved in favor of the general provision rather than the proviso or exception.