Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.29s
Lenape Regional High School District Board of Education v. Gp
205 N.J. 96 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 3, 2011
13 A.3d 363 (2011) 205 N.J. 96 LENAPE REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION v. G.P. C-581 September Term 2010, 067057 Supreme Court of New Jersey. February 3, 2011. Petition for Certification Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedZeman v. TOWNSHIP OF RIVER VALE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
203 N.J. 92 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 19, 2010
999 A.2d 464 (2010) 203 N.J. 92 ZEMAN v. TOWNSHIP OF RIVER VALE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. C-1119 September Term 2009, 065861. Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 19, 2010. Petition for Certification Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished77 N.J.L. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908
The procuration need not directly affect the board of registration, but if it puts in motion an act operating either upon the voter or upon the board, which results in getting a false name upon the registry list, it is within … Bishop: “The test to determine whether an of- *83 fence may be deemed joint or not, has been stated by an American judge (Chief Justice Robertson, in Comm v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAwacs, Inc. v. Clementon Zoning Board of Adjustment
153 N.J. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 11, 1998
Petition for certification is granted and summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to reconsider in the light of Smart SMR of New York v. Borough of Fair Lawn Board of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309 , 704 A.2d 1271 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedStancil v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BOARD OF REVIEW
202 N.J. 345 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 2010
997 A.2d 230 (2010) 202 N.J. 345 STANCIL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR BOARD OF REVIEW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 17, 2010. Petition for Certification Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPRB Enterprises, Inc. v. South Brunswick Planning Board
103 N.J. 488 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 1986
Cited 0 timesPublishedCliff v. Morris County Board of Social Services
101 N.J. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1985
pay; and it is further ORDERED that the judgment of hte Appellate Division as to that issue is reversed, and this matter is summarily remanded to the Civil Service Commission for reconsideration in the light of Steinel v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHeath v. Board of Managers of the Jersey City Medical Center
89 N.J. 441 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 30, 1982
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textHowe v. Board of Education of Landis Township School District
72 N.J.L. 158 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1905
The fourth reason is that at the meeting in question the voters did not, before proceeding to ballot for members of the board of education, determine whether such board should consist of three, five or nine members. … State v. Van Winkle, 1 Dutcher 73; State v. Donahay, 1 Vroom 404 . Upon the same ground proceeded the decision in State, Winsor, pros., v. Brown et al., 2 Id. 355.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHackensack Board of Education v. Hackensack Education Ass'n
91 N.J. 217 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublishedBerninger v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK
127 N.J. 226 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1992
Cited 6 timesPublishedTerry v. Mercer County Board of Chosen Freeholders
85 N.J. 122 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 21, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Edison Township Education Ass'n
81 N.J. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 1979
certification is granted, the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s determination in Board … of Education of the Township of Bernards, Somerset County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMillville Electric Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
103 N.J.L. 198 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1926
Cited 1 timesPublishedRingleben v. City of Long Branch
11 N.J. Misc. 391 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 25, 1933
Brown, the commissioner of public safety, to enter into the contract. The appellant’s argument seems to be that the testimony of Mr. Brown was incompetent to prove his agency. … Leonard v. Standard Aero Corp., 95 N. J. L. 235, 237; 112 Atl. Rep. 252 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedHudson Bus Transportation Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
131 N.J.L. 576 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1944
Perth Amboy v. Board of Public, Utility Commissioners, 98 N. J. L. 106; O'Connor v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 128 Id. 35; Collingswood v. Water Supply Commission, 84 Id. 104; affirmed, 85 Id. 673. … Nulley-Times Square Service v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 109 N. J. L. 289.
Cited 5 timesPublishedState ex rel. Eggie v. Board of Commissioners
6 N.J. Misc. 1094 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 30, 1928
Schait v. Senior, 117 Atl. Rep. 517 ; Johnston v. Hague, 136 Id. 407; Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow, 134 Id. 557; Koplin v. South Orange, 6 N. J. Mis. … Rem. 47; State v. Newark, 35 N. J. L. 396; Secaucus v. Kiesewetter, 83 Id. 227. The result is that the application for the writ will be denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDouglass v. Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church
112 N.J. Eq. 361 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1933
Cited 5 timesPublishedAtlantic City Sewerage Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
100 N.J.L. 395 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1924
Cited 2 timesPublishedLindsley v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison
107 N.J.L. 51 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 2, 1930
People v. Hayes, 140 N. Y. 484 ; Calder v. Bull, 3 Dall. 386 ; 1 Law Ed. 648. Other classes sometimes added to the foregoing are: 5. … Browne v. Lee, 98 N. J. L. 1. A peremptory writ of mandamus is denied. If an appeal is desired, the proceedings may be moulded to that end.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna