Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.37s
Harris v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry
9 N.J. Misc. 635 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 4, 1931
The writ of certiorari brings up for review a resolution, of the state board of registration and examination in dentistry-revoking the license of Simon Harris to practice dentistry in. this state. … The board found, from the proofs adduced, that Harris was guilty of malpractice and the publications of false, fraudulent'and misleading statements of his art, skill and knowledge.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWest Shore Railroad v. Board Of Public Utility Commissioners
11 N.J. Misc. 149 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1933
This writ of certiorari brings up an order of the board of public utility commissioners, dated June 25th, 1931, modifying a previous order which directed the elimination of a grade crossing at Bogota. … This is known as P-5 revised, or the board’s plan. The railroads contend that the original plan, B-2, should have been retained.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNewark Fire Insurance v. State Board of Tax Appeals
120 N.J.L. 224 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 1938
Cited 0 timesPublishedSun Oil Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation
122 N.J.L. 594 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1939
The judgment under review will be set aside for the reasons stated in Duke Power Co. v. The Essex County Board of Taxation and the City of Newark, 122 N. J. L. 589.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAtlantic City & Shore Railroad v. State Board of Assessors
87 N.J.L. 137 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1915
Paterson, &c., Electric Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 69 Id. 116; 70 Id. 825. This assessment cannot be set aside on that ground. … Griffith v. City of Trenton, 76 Id. 23; State v. Twining, 73 Id. 683; State v. Corson, 67 Id. 178; Stagway v. Riker, 84 Id. 201. The assessment is therefore affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Forest Park Reservation Commissioners v. Veeder
87 N.J.L. 479 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1915
This case, though it differs in its facts from those which were present in State Board of Forest Park Reservation Commissioners against McCloskejr, decided at the present term of court, nevertheless calls for the application
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Powell v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
59 N.J.L. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896
The relator asks for a mandamus to compel the defendant, the board of freeholders of the county of Camden, to fix his fees and expenses, as keeper of the morgue of that county, for the recovery and care of the bodies of the … dead ■during his term of office. *118 The act-relative to morgues and moi’gue-keepers provides-that the fees and expenses of moigue-keepers for the recovery and care of the bodies of the.unknown dead shall be fixed by the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. State Board of Education
126 N.J.L. 210 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1941
The State Board properly held that R. … was imposed by the State Board regulation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBorough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals
123 N.J.L. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 14, 1939
The judgment of the county board, in the circumstances, was a nullity. … We think the judgment of the state board was right. See Mellor v. Kaighn, 89 N. J. L. 543, and Shrewsbury v. Merchants Steamboat Co., 76 Id. 407.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoboken Ferry Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
103 N.J.L. 148 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1926
On appeal to the state board from the larger assessment it was reduced to $98,000, and on review by certiorari was still further reduced by the Supreme Court to $75,000 per acre for each year. … This rule, stated in Yellow Pine Co. v. Board of Assessors, 72 N. J. L. 182, has been so many times reiterated in this court that it needs no further citation of authority. The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation
127 N.J.L. 314 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941
Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board, 124 N. J. L. 481; affirmed, 125 Id. 431. There seems to be no dispute as to the correctness of this characterization. … Duke Power Co. v. Essex County Board, &c., 122 Id. 589; affirmed, 124 Id. 41. Eixed capital may or may not be personalty having a situs in the City of Newark.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals
117 N.J.L. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1936
This appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court refusing to quash certain subpoenas requiring the appellants, who were members of the state board of tax appeals, to appear and testify as witnesses before a Supreme- Court
Cited 0 timesPublishedBucholtz v. Board of Adjustments of City of Ventnor
106 N.J.L. 562 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1930
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Med. Examiners of N.J. v. Blechschmidt
106 N.J.L. 602 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders of Atlantic County v. Lee
77 N.J.L. 799 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 1909
Cited 0 timesPublishedLong Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
90 N.J.L. 702 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 24, 1917
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, &c., No. 48 of the present term of this court.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPassaic Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
90 N.J.L. 714 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn Maneely Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals
22 N.J. Misc. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 24, 1944
Upon an examination of the facts and the law of this case we aré of the view that the matter was correctly decided by the State Board of Tax Appeals of New Jersey' whose opinion is reported in 21 N. J. Mis. R. 229. … The writ of certiorari is therefore dismissed and the tax judgment affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the State Board of Tax Appeals of New Jersey.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLehigh Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
5 N.J. Misc. 559 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1927
The view of the board on this point meets with my entire *561 concurrence. … I have no doubt whatever about the jurisdiction of the board. It is not claimed, I think, that it was challenged at the hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKehoe v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners
112 N.J.L. 504 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1934
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna