Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.70s
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
4 N.J. Misc. 827 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926
These cases are disposed of by what we said in the opinion in the case No. 245 (Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment) for the years 1921 and 1922. … The testimony taken before the state board of taxes and assessment was returned with the writs in one printed volume. A rule may be entered in accordance with the views above expressed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBorough of Closter v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
5 N.J. Misc. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927
Those assessments were canceled by the state board of taxes and assessment on the ground that they were duplicate assessments. With this conclusion of the state board we agree. … The state board filed a memorandum stating its reasons for the action taken.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Doremus v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
86 N.J.L. 108 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 23, 1914
This rule is issued for the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Passaic, and the individual members thereof, to show cause why they should not be compelled to purchase a tract of land in the city of Passaic, for … Huggs v. Camden, 39 N. J. L. 620.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of New Brunswick v. Board of Conservation & Development
94 N.J.L. 558 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1920
Cited 0 timesPublishedWashington Camp No. 23 v. Board of Equalization of Taxes
87 N.J.L. 53 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1915
This was unquestionably its relation in the act of 1903 (see Stevens Institute v. Bowes, 78 N. J. L. 205; Institute of Holy Angels v. Bender, 79 Id. 34; Montclair v. … In Cooper Hospital v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCity of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals
14 N.J. Misc. 206 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 17, 1936
This is common practice in the case of local boards, as for example, in Lehigh Talley Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 81 N. J. L. 290, 295; 80 Atl. Rep. 228 , and very recently in Oritani Field Club v. Hackensack, 12 N. J. … In Bayonne v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 334; 178 Atl.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAcquackanonk Water Co. v. Passaic County Board of Taxation
88 N.J.L. 555 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 3, 1916
This rule was established by the board in pursuance of the power contained in the ninth section of the act of 1906, creating county boards of taxation in each county of the state. … Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization, 78 N. J. L. 302, 304.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTown of Montclair v. State Board of Tax Appeals
128 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 23, 1942
Cited 1 timesPublishedNorth Bergen Action Group v. North Bergen Township Planning Board
122 N.J. 567 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1991
As in Commercial Realty and Resources Corp. v. … See Davis Enters, v. Karpf, 105 N.J. 476, 493 , 523 A.2d 137 (1987) (Stein, J., concurring).
Cited 12 timesPublishedAmerican Grocery Co. v. Board of Commissioners of New Brunswick
124 N.J.L. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 14, 1940
Compare, Giant Tiger Corp. v. Board of Commissioners of Trenton, 11 N. J. Mis. R. 797, 799; 168 Atl. Rep. 309 ; affirmed, 113 N. J. L. 34; 172 Atl. … Wagman v. Trenton, 102 N. J. L. 492, 493, 494; 134 Atl. Rep. 115 ; Giant Tiger Corp. v. Board of Commissioners of Trenton, supra (at p. 798). (S. C.) The answer to this branch of the argument depends upon the proofs.
Cited 15 timesPublishedEvaul v. Board of Education of City of Camden
35 N.J. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961
Later in the evening, she sent telegrams to the Superintendent, the President of the Board, and the Board in care of the Secretary, informing them she was rescinding her resignation. … Rubenstein v. Rubenstein, 20 N. J. 359 (1956); Gobac v. Davis, 62 N. J.
Cited 1 timesPublishedD.I.A.L. v. City of Clifton Construction Board of Appeals
113 N.J. 335 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 7, 1988
Cited 0 timesPublishedDobbins v. Board of Education of Henry Hudson Regional School
67 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 20, 1975
Cited 6 timesPublishedLindsley v. Board of Managers of N.J. State Prison
108 N.J.L. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1932
Cited 1 timesPublishedFairmount Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals
123 N.J.L. 201 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1939
Cited 1 timesPublishedNatale v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
107 N.J. 150 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1987
107 N.J. 150 (1987) 526 A.2d 210 FRANCIS V. NATALE v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 28, 1987. Petition for certification denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBalsley v. North Hunterdon Regional School District Board of Education
117 N.J. 434 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1990
None of the cases cited by the complainant, which illustrate the Commissioner’s broad remedial powers, see, e.g., Board of Educ. of Elizabeth v. … City Council, 55 N.J. 501 (1970); Board of Educ. of East Brunswick Township v. Township Council, 48 N.J. 94 (1966); Laba v. Newark Bd. of Educ., 23 N.J. 364 (1957); Board of Educ. of *443 Newark v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedCentral Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
3 N.J. Misc. 475 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry v. Karas
10 N.J. Misc. 759 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1932
The defendant was complained against by the state board of registration and examination in dentistry of a violation of section 11 of the Dental act (chapter 266, laws of 1927), in that he practiced dentistry within the meaning … The state board thereupon sued out this writ of certiorari.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHudson Transit Corp. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
15 N.J. Misc. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1937
The respondent, the board of public utility commissioners of ISFew Jerse_y, having requested the return of the record in this proceeding in order that it might rescind its action heretofore taken, and no objection being made … If no action shall be taken by the board within twenty days, the record may again be forwarded to this court for the determination of the issues involved in the proceeding herein pending at this time.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna