Case law

City of Clifton v. State Board of Tax Appeals

131 N.J.L. 356 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1944

Upon appeal to the State Board of Tax Appeals, the judgment of the Passaic Comity Board of Taxation was reversed and the assessments on all the ])arcels of property in question were canceled. West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. … The history and facts are fully set forth in the State Board’s opinion.

Miller v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

112 N.J.L. 505 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1934

Town of Irvington v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

107 N.J.L. 191 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1930

The opinion of the Supreme Court per curiam was written in that of Borough of Roselle Park et al. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, Public Service Railway Company and Public Service Transportation Company. … After the entry of judgment in the Supreme Court adjudging that the order of the board be affirmed and the certioraris dismissed, an appeal was taken to this court by the town of Irvington and Alice M.

Township of Pensauken v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

10 N.J. Misc. 16 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 10, 1931

this judgment of the county board both the owner and the township of Pensauken appeaLed to the state board. … The findings and judgment of said board are against the clear weight of the evidence produced before it.

Licata v. New Jersey State Board of Tax Appeals

12 N.J. Misc. 15 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1933

The state tax commissioner ruled that operators of jitneys in Atlantic City pajdng a flat municipal tax of $100 were exempt from payment of the motor fuel tax and the state board of tax appeals concurred in this ruling, and … Looking at the design of the taxation, we can only conclude that the ruling of the state board of tax appeals was correct.

County of Hudson v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

124 N.J.L. 563 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 25, 1940

Carteret Academy, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

110 N.J.L. 378 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 27, 1933

Motor Transport Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

104 N.J.L. 234 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1928

Hunter v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 1 N. J. Mis. R. 408. … , the order of the board under review will be affirmed, with costs.

D. Fullerton & Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 677 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 273 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45, of the present term of this court (post p. 283).

Strader v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Sussex County

15 N.J.L. 433 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 15, 1836

Cited in Rodenbury v. Rosebury, 4 Zab. 493.

State ex rel. Wheeler v. Essex Public Road Board

40 N.J.L. 138 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1878

It was held in Het *140 field v. Central R. R. … Co. v. Johnston, 59 Penna. St. 290-5. There is no distinction between the character of the board and the highway in this case which should change the rule thus applied to railway companies and their roads.

Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

61 N.J.L. 129 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1897

But the defendants, empowered by law to build the bridge, are likewise empowered to construct the necessary approaches (Freeholders of Sussex v.

Somers Lumber Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assesment

9 N.J. Misc. 248 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 5, 1931

This act was construed, in this court, in Evening Journal Association and Jersey City Printing Co. v. State Board of Assessors et al., 47 N. J. L. 36. … This case decided in 1885 was followed in 1888, the statute remaining the same, by Press Printing Co. v. State Board, 51 N. J. L. 75, the same justice delivering the opinion as in the prior cited case.

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

5 N.J. Misc. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1927

City of Elizabeth v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

1 N.J. Misc. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1923

used by the board in other appraisal work. … O’Brien v. Public Utility Board, 92 N. J. L. 44. A starved utility is in no better position *277 to render proper service than a starved horse or a motor car without fuel.

Commonwealth Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

1 N.J. Misc. 355 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1923

Our examination of the voluminous record *356 satisfies us that the order of the board is supported by the facts produced before the board, as set out in the printed book furnished to the court. … But the board, at page 423 of the report, did allow this item as a deduction from the operating revenue.

Ironbound Transportation Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

8 N.J. Misc. 472 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 28, 1930

The prosecutors as parties to a proceeding before the board of public utility commissioners, desire to review the decision of that board in approving the suspension of certain *473 street railway service upon certain streets … the application involves an ascertainment of the meaning and effect of the supplement of March 19th, 1928 (PamphL., p. 112), to the Utilities act of 1911, and specifically of the question whether the action taken by the board

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

4 N.J. Misc. 827 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926

These cases are disposed of by what we said in the opinion in the case No. 245 (Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment) for the years 1921 and 1922. … The testimony taken before the state board of taxes and assessment was returned with the writs in one printed volume. A rule may be entered in accordance with the views above expressed.

Borough of Closter v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

5 N.J. Misc. 94 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927

Those assessments were canceled by the state board of taxes and assessment on the ground that they were duplicate assessments. With this conclusion of the state board we agree. … The state board filed a memorandum stating its reasons for the action taken.