Case law

Public Service Electric Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

87 N.J.L. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 1915

Thereupon, the city appealed to the board of public utility commissioners, which board, after a hearing, made an order directing thé prosecutor to conform- to the duties imposed on it by the contract and to furnish free of … Co. v. Motley, 219 U. S. 485 .

City of Camden v. State Board of Tax Appeals

122 N.J.L. 253 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1939

It was held in West Orange v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 115 N. J. … of Milk Control v.

Walker v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County

82 N.J.L. 348 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1912

Oates v. National Bank, 100 U. S. 239 ; State v. Clark, 5 Dutcher 96. … Farrell v. State, 25 Vroom 421 .

City of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals

14 N.J. Misc. 206 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 17, 1936

This is common practice in the case of local boards, as for example, in Lehigh Talley Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 81 N. J. L. 290, 295; 80 Atl. Rep. 228 , and very recently in Oritani Field Club v. Hackensack, 12 N. J. … In Bayonne v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 334; 178 Atl.

First Church of Christ, Scientist v. Board of Adjustment

127 N.J.L. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941

It has been vacant for about fourteen years and is not salable for any purpose other than a gasoline station and lubritorium for which a permit was refused by the Fewark Board of Adjustment. … The action of the board will be reversed.

Fejoku v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of Am., Inc.

236 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 2018

Saunders v. Toms River Regional Schools Board of Education

144 N.J. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 2, 1996

Town of West Orange v. State Board of Tax Appeals

115 N.J.L. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 1935

The statutes creating and regulating the present state board of tax appeals, chapters 100 and 336 of the laws of 1931, give the board power to make reasonable rules and regulations governing appeals to it. … We are of the opinion that the board had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Points six and seven again argue that the judgment of the board went beyond its powers, but as stated above, we think it did not.

Long Dock Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

87 N.J.L. 22 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1915

The rule of law is thus stated in Jersey City v. Board of Assessors, 73 N. J. L. 164 (at p. 166) : “The proper method of assessment must be-determined by the nature of the title of defendants. … The nature of the right conveyed by a charter of this character is similar to that conveyed under- the Eiparian act, and the rule established bjr the Court of Errors- and Appeals in Polhemus v. Bateman, 60 N. J.

Evaul v. Board of Education of City of Camden

35 N.J. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1961

Later in the evening, she sent telegrams to the Superintendent, the President of the Board, and the Board in care of the Secretary, informing them she was rescinding her resignation. … Rubenstein v. Rubenstein, 20 N. J. 359 (1956); Gobac v. Davis, 62 N. J.

Dobbins v. Board of Education of Henry Hudson Regional School

67 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 20, 1975

Fairmount Hospital, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

123 N.J.L. 201 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1939

City of Newark v. State Board of Tax Appeals

15 N.J. Misc. 368 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 15, 1937

The proceedings before the board were initiated by the city of Hoboken. The board has jurisdiction of the subject-matter. West Orange v. State Board of Tax *369 Appeals, 115 N. J. L. 396; 180 Atl. … City of Plainfield v. McGrath, 117 N. J. L. 348; 188 Atl. Rep. 733 . We see no reason for following another course. The application is denied, with costs to the appearing respondents above named.

Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

90 N.J.L. 331 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the case of Peoples Bank and Trust Co. v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, decided at this term (ante p. 171).

Bergen County Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 858 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1923

City of Elizabeth v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

99 N.J.L. 496 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 18, 1924

Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The judgment under "review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45, of the present term of this court (post p. 283).

National Storage Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

98 N.J.L. 280 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1922

The judgment under review herein will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. … State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., No. 45 of the present term of this court (post p. 283). For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, White, Williams,.

State Ex Rel. Wrocklage v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

134 N.J.L. 373 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1946

Upon the filing of the aforesaid certificate, the county treasurer and the Board of Freeholders of Bergen County determined that relator was “not eligible for retirement or a pension at this time due to the fact that the

Rankin v. Board of Education of Egg Harbor Twp.

134 N.J.L. 342 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 10, 1946

See Hahn Motor Truck Corp. v. Atlantic City, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 234; Peter’s Garage v. Burlington County, 121 N. J. L. 523; affirmed, 123 Id. 227. It is perhaps true that the wording of R. … Hammonton v. Elvins, 101 Id. 38, 41. The statutory requirements may not be designed to be all-inclusive.