Case law

State ex rel. Ruffu v. Board of Medical Examiners

10 N.J. Misc. 1209 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1932

Ruffu for license to practice medicine and surgery came before the board and the board finds that the credentials attached to the application of Dr. … We think that the action of the board was not an abuse of discretion; that *1212 on the contrary it was within the legitimate field of board determination.

Public Service Electric Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

88 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 6, 1916

See Citizens Gas Light Co. v. Alden, 44 N. J. L. 648; Williams v. Brokaw, 74 N. J. Eq. 561; Frelinghuysen v. Morristown, 77 N. J. L. 493; Plahn v. Givernand, 96 Atl. Rep. 40 . … Flanigan v. Guggenheim Smelting Co., 63 N. J. L. 647, 650; Smith v. Livesey, 67 Id. 269; Ex parte Thompson, 96 Atl. Rep. 102, 106 . The views above expressed lead to an affirmance of the judgment under review.

Board of Trustees v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad

85 N.J.L. 278 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1914

Pope v. Union, 3 C. E. Gr. 282; Trustees v. Hoboken, 4 Vroom 13 ; Attorney-General v. M. & E. R. R. Co., 4 C. E. Gr. 386; Clark v. Elizabeth, 11 Vroom 172 ; McAndrews & Forbes Co. v. Camden, 8 Buch. 244 ; Camden v. … McAndrews & Forbes Co. v. Camden, supra; Freeholders v. Sharpless, 54 Vroom 443 .

Town of Kearny v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

81 N.J.L. 106 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1911

Turnkey v. Elizabeth, 47 Vroom 42 ; Clark v. Board of Equalization, 50 Id. 454. But a difficulty is encountered in the form of the judgment which prevents its affirmance in tolo. … The board did not even direct a proportionate reduction similar to the proportionate increase ordered by a county board in Wayne Township v. Powder Company, 47 Vroom 175 .

Public Service Electric Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

87 N.J.L. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 27, 1915

Thereupon, the city appealed to the board of public utility commissioners, which board, after a hearing, made an order directing thé prosecutor to conform- to the duties imposed on it by the contract and to furnish free of … Co. v. Motley, 219 U. S. 485 .

West Shore Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

116 N.J.L. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1936

Kehoe v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

112 N.J.L. 504 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1934

Phillipsburg Transit Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

101 N.J.L. 225 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1925

City of Clifton v. State Board of Tax Appeals

134 N.J.L. 385 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1946

Rahway v. Board of Health of the State of New Jersey, 80 N. J. L. 166; Lucas v. Board of Commissioners of the Town of Montclair, 128 Id. 152; affirmed, 130 Id. 533. … Paterson v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 56 Id. 459.

Mayor of Jersey City v. State Board of Assessors

73 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1906

The general principles which govern this case have been stated in the opinion in Jersey City v. United New Jersey Railroad and Canal Company and others. … They were erroneously assessed as main stem, and the assessments should be referred back to the board of assessors for correction and re-assessment in accordance with the views herein expressed.

City of New Brunswick v. Board of Conservation & Development

94 N.J.L. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 16, 1920

water from the Raritan and Millstone *47 rivers near their junction in the county of Somerset, filed a joint petition accompanied with maps and plans indicating the method of diversion, as required by the statute, with the board … After notice to parties interested, and following a hearing, the state board approved the plans as to the three companies herein before specifically named and denied it as to the two other companies, and made an order to

Mayor of Jersey City v. State Board of Taxation

70 N.J.L. 159 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1903

The act of March 19th, 1891, creating the state board of taxation. Gen. Stat., p. 3344. … That act also gives the said board power to secure the equalization, revision and enforcement of taxation. Second. The act of 1894 (Gen. Stat., p. 3347), which authorizes the state board to increase assessments. Third.

Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n v. Board of Education

3 N.J. Misc. 840 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 21, 1925

Motor Transport Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

105 N.J.L. 244 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 15, 1928

Mechanics' Mutual Loan Ass'n v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

56 N.J.L. 6 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1893

Halsey Electric Generator Co. v. State Board of Assessors

74 N.J.L. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907

Greenville Bus Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

126 N.J.L. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1941

“(e) The corporate minute book, the stock ledger, the books of account, the Certificate of approval of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners, approving of the stock, and the certificates of approval of the Board of Public … This last proposal is beyond the competence of the Board and is not within the limits of the application.

Licata v. New Jersey State Board of Tax Appeals

113 N.J.L. 36 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1934

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

5 N.J. Misc. 559 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1927

The view of the board on this point meets with my entire *561 concurrence. … I have no doubt whatever about the jurisdiction of the board. It is not claimed, I think, that it was challenged at the hearing.

First Church of Christ, Scientist v. Board of Adjustment

127 N.J.L. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941

It has been vacant for about fourteen years and is not salable for any purpose other than a gasoline station and lubritorium for which a permit was refused by the Fewark Board of Adjustment. … The action of the board will be reversed.