Case law

Parsippany-Troy Hills Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

94 N.J. 527 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1983

Board of Education v. New Jersey Department of Education

183 N.J. 281 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 2005

This case, like Board of Education of the City of Millville v. … Here, the City of Passaic Board of Education (Passaic or District) raises three issues — whether Abbott district preschool programs must be fully funded by the State; whether the Commissioner may require Passaic to reallocate

Eastern Pennsylvania Power Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

100 N.J.L. 255 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1924

and assessed upon gross receipts of street railway, traction, gas and electric light, heat and power corporations, an additional annual tax at the average rate of taxation of this state as computed and fixed by the state board

State ex rel. Knight v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

48 N.J.L. 70 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1886

The proceedings taken by the board upon Mr. Lindabury’s bill were likewise taken with respect to the bill of the relator. For the reasons given by Mr. Justice Depue, in the case of Lindabury v. … Queen v. Sandwich, 2 Q. B; 895, 907.

City of Newark v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

9 N.J. Misc. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 25, 1931

Application is made by the city of Newark for a certiorari to review the action of the state board of taxes and assessment in affirming the cancellation by the Essex county board of taxation, of an assessment levied for the … City of Trenton v. Trenton Masonic Temple Association, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 778. The application for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Charles Warner Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments

1 N.J. Misc. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1923

An, appeal was then taken to the state board of taxes and assessments which affirmed the assessments made by the Gloucester county board. This property was purchased by the prosecutor in August, 1918. … Trenton and Mercer County Traction Corporation v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment et al., 92 N. J. L. 398. In this case it seems to us that evidence shows that the assessment fixed by the state board is excessive.

Elizabethtown Gas Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

95 N.J.L. 18 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 7, 1920

The *19 general principles are settled by what was said in Public Service Gas Co. v. Public Utility Board, 84 N. J. L. 463; affirmed on opinion, 87 Id. 597, and O’Brien v. Public Utility Board, 93 Id. 44. … Lincoln Gas Co. v. Lincoln, 250 U. S. 256 (at p. 268).

Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Railroad Commissioners

79 N.J.L. 154 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 25, 1909

in accordance with the judgment of said board, for the proper transportation of persons and property, and to make and issue such orders to any railroad company as in the judgment of said board shall be reasonable and just … Thus it appears that the legislature has committed to the board the power to exercise a reasonable and just judgment upon the matters committed to its jurisdiction, and I am of opinion that the result which the board reaches

Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

5 N.J. 114 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1950

Despite this unequivocal finding the Board, considering itself bound by the decision in O’Connor v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 129 N. J. … Co. v. Wisconsin, 238 U. S. 491 , 59 L. Ed. 1423 , 35 Sup. Ct. 869 (1915); Mississippi R. Com. v. Mobile & O. R. Co., 244 U. S. 388 , 61 L. Ed. 1216 , 37 Sup. Ct. 602 (1917); Brooks-Scanlon v.

Hillsborough Township Board of Education v. Hillsborough Township Education Ass'n

109 N.J. 39 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 6, 1987

Lakewood Express Service, Inc. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

1 N.J. 45 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1948

Co. v. Board, 84 N. J. L. 184, p. 189 (Sup. Ct. 1913); N. J. Suburban Water Co. v. Board, 123 N. J. L. 303, p. 307 (E. & A. 1939). … . & A. 1935); Hart v. Teaneck, 135 N. J. L. 174 (E. & A. 1947); Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Public Utilities Com'n, 301 U. S. 292, 304 , 81 L. Ed. 1093 , 57 S. Ct. 724; Yakus v. the United States, 321 U.

Ocean Township Board of Education v. Ocean Township Education Ass'n

105 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 30, 1986

Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

122 N.J.L. 596 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 1939

The rule for assessment for taxation is stated in Stevens Institute v. State Board, &c., 105 N. J. … In Woodcliff Lake v. State Board, &c., 14 N. J. Mis. R. 132; affirmed, 117 N. J. L. 114, it was held that a value for rate making purposes was not material in fixing the taxable value of a reservoir.

West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. State Board of Tax Appeals

125 N.J.L. 274 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1940

Fair Lawn Education Ass'n v. Fair Lawn Board of Education

78 N.J. 394 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 4, 1978

Township of Berkeley Heights v. Union County Board of Taxation

61 N.J. 162 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 1972

Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

33 N.J. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 2, 1960

Union County Park Commission v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

3 N.J. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 31, 1949

The 1913 and 1914 acts are in substantially the same language and provide that “the board of chosen freeholders may from time to time * .* * on the requisition of said board of park commissioners * * * borrow money by issuing … sections are unconstitutional under the principle that invalidates statutes “which cannot take effect through the exercise of a discretion or of a will intervening between the legislature and the voter,” Attorney General v.

West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. State Board of Tax Appeals

124 N.J.L. 284 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 9, 1940

The State Board of Tax Appeals pointed out that there had been, since the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals in West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. Clifton, 109 N. J. L. 146; 160 Atl. … We are entirely in accord with the view of the State Board of Tax Appeals that there is nothing in principle to distinguish the case at bar from the sound holding in the case of Mausoleum Builders of New Jersey v.

Black v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

80 N.J.L. 29 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 16, 1910

The writ in this cause reviews the proceedings of the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Atlantic that culminated in a contract between said board and Bryant Reilly for the ■ permanent improvement of a public road … The case of North Baptist Church v.