Case law

Fejoku v. Prudential Life Ins. Co. of Am., Inc.

236 N.J. 66 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 2018

Borough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 112 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1941

North Bergen v. State Board, 2 N. J. Mis. R. 258; affirmed, 101 N. J. L. 235. The statutory prerequisite being duly complied with in this case, we are of the opinion that the correction prayed for should be made. … The appellant argues that North Bergen v. State Board, supra, is not in point because in that case there was an appeal pending before the State Board which is not the situation with the case at bar.

State ex rel. Cleveland v. Board of Finance & Taxation

38 N.J.L. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1876

Walter v. Union, 4 Vroom 350 ; State v. City of Newark, 3 Dutcher 185 ; State, Ruckman, v. Demarest, 3 Vroom 528 ; Campbell v. City of Kenosha, 5 Wall. 194 ; City v. Lamson, 9 Ib. 477 ; Cooley’s Const. Lim. 371, &c. … Hawes, 37 Barb. 440 ; Plimpton v.

Sheston Oil Co. v. Borough of Avalon Planning Board

107 N.J. 134 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 24, 1987

Saxenmeyer v. State Board of Registration

79 N.J.L. 427 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1910

State v. Knowles, 90 Md. 646 . … the state board of examiners, and that no examination was made of the relator by that board as to his qualifications to practice dentistry, for the affidavit of the secretary of the Pennsylvania board of examiners is that

Doe v. Hopewell Valley Regional School District Board of Education

231 N.J. 309 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 26, 2017

Matter of CVS Pharmacy Wayne

116 N.J. 490 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 14, 1989

Brown, supra, 113 N.J. at 584 ; Riggs v. Township of Long Beach, 109 N.J. 601, 613 (1988). … Brown, supra, 113 N.J. at 577 ; State v. Lee, 96 N.J. 156, 165-66 (1984); Town *501 Tobacconist v. Kimmelman, 94 N.J. 85, 125 (1983).

City of Englewood v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

71 N.J.L. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1904

L., p. 134), for constituting county boards of equalization of taxes, it.is made the duty of the assessors of the several taxing districts in the countv' wherein such a board exists to deliver to the board, on the first Tuesday … I think the board was mistaken as to its power. The board was authorized to receive only legal duplicates, and that implies authority to ascertain whether the documents presented are such.

State ex rel. Stokes v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

35 N.J.L. 217 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1871

of chosen freeholders of the county of Camden clearly erred. “ That act,” says Chief Justice Green, in the State v. … The powers of those boards, within their respective jurisdictions, are substantially the same.

Atlantic City & Shore Railroad v. State Board of Assessors

88 N.J.L. 219 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 28, 1916

Paterson and Passaic Gas Co. v. Board of Assessors, 69 N. J. L. 116; affirmed, 70 Id. 825. Ttie question of the constitutionality of the act was not there considered. In North Jersey Street Railway Co. v. … This was followed in Phillipsburg Railroad Co. v. Board of Assessors, 82 Id. 49.

Essex County Board of Taxation v. Township of Caldwell

176 N.J. 426 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 2003

824 A.2d 156 (2003) 176 N.J. 426 ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v.

Cherokee LCP Land, LLC v. City of Linden Planning Board

230 N.J. 500 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 2017

Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation

124 N.J.L. 481 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 1940

The cases upon which the prosecutor relies —Folwell, White & Co. v. Warford, 32 N. J. L. 207, and Mitsch v. Township of Riverside, 86 Id. 603, are not at all applicable. Lastly it is said that R. … State v. Gibbons, 4 N. J. L. 45, 53 (*48).

City of Clifton v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 205 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1941

On appeal the Passaic County Board of Taxation affirmed the assessment. The State Board of Tax Appeals reversed the judgment of the County Board and ordered the assessment to be canceled. … McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 432 ; 4 L. Ed. 579, 607 ; Van Brocklin v. Tennessee (Van Brocklin v. Anderson), 117 U. S. 151, 158, 159 ; 29 L. Ed. 845, 847, 848 ; 6 S. Ct. 670 ; South Carolina v.

Walker v. Board of Education of the School District

120 N.J.L. 408 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1938

Invoking the rule enunciated by this court in Smith v. Carty, 15 N. J. Mis. … The evidence demonstrates that the real object was the frustration of the judgment of the State Board of Education, holding that the local board’s claim of a consolidation of classes to effect economy was a mere pretext to

Van Horn v. Board of Freeholders

83 N.J.L. 239 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1912

McChesney v. Trenton, 21 Vroom 338 ; Sutherland v. Jersey City, 32 Id. 493. … Sutherland v. Jersey City, supra; Evans v. Freeholders, 24 Vroom 585 . In the recent case of Paddock v.

Clinton Trust Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

124 N.J.L. 245 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 29, 1940

The local taxing authorities refused to allow the deduction and were sustained therein by the County Tax Board and the State Board of Tax Appeals. The tax is imposed upon the shares of common stock. R. … Central Railroad Co. v. State Tax Department, 112 N. J. L. 5. The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals will be affirmed, with costs.

City of Clifton v. State Board of Tax Appeals

133 N.J.L. 379 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1945

S. 14:1 — 1, et séq.), and was devoted to cemetery uses for profit (West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 124 N. J. … Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes, &c., 101 N. J. L. 371; Jordan v. Borough of Dumont, 105 Id. 197; Harman v. Reed, 108 Id; 191; Vanderbach v. Hudso n County Board of Taxation, 133 Id. 126.

Sexton v. Board of Excise Commissioners

76 N.J.L. 102 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1908

An apposite illustration of the soundness of this view is furnished in Miller v. Camden, 34 Vroom 501 . The board of excise of the city of Camden was established under the act of 1886. Pcuinph. L., p. 397. … That the granting of power to license upon the board of excise commissioners did not repeal previous statutory limitations upon the licensing power is exhibited also by the case of Peer v.

Taber v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry

1 N.J. 343 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1949

The State Board of Registration and Examination in Dentistry, after hearing, found that Dr. Sydney A. … Schwartz v. State Board of Registration and Examination in Dentistry, 125 N. J. L. 330 (Sup. Ct. 1940).