Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.11s
City of Passaic v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
87 N.J.L. 705 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1915
Their position will he made clearer if it be assumed that the gas company had accepted the rate fixed by the board. … The board awarded part of their claim and denied the rest.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCity of Garfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals
131 N.J.L. 364 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 13, 1944
This court will not disturb such finding unless the evidence is persuasive that the Board erred. Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 N. J. L. 174; affirmed, 123 Id. 200; Gannon v. State Board, 123 Id. 450. … The Board saw the property and had the benefit of hearing the witnesses before it.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAmerican Malt Corp. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
86 N.J.L. 668 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1914
We do not, however, wish to be understood that had we differed from the Supreme Court and reached the conclusion that the board of public utility commissioners had not exercised a sound but an arbitrary and unreasonable discretion … in disapproving of the merger of these corporations, that our decision would be different. .The question, whether or not the Supreme Court has the power to review and reverse the determination of such board in the matter
Cited 2 timesPublishedPennsylvania Tunnel & Terminal Co. v. State Board of Assessors
84 N.J.L. 49 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 28, 1913
Florida Central, &c., Railroad Co. v. Reynolds, 183 U. S. 471, 475 . … Central Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 4 6 Vroom 771. The subject to be dealt with was omitted property, and all property of that class must under our constitutional provision be treated alike.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBergen Aqueduct Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessments
95 N.J.L. 486 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 28, 1921
Co. v. Greene, 244 U. … S. 575 ; Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Pennsylvania, 141 Id. 18.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTownship of Morris v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
49 N.J. 194 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 24, 1967
J. 241 (1957); Woodside Homes, Inc. v. Town of Morristown, 26 N. … Compare, City of Texarkana v. Wiggins, 151 Tex. 100 , 246 S. W. 2d 622 (Sup. Ct. 1952). We do not regard In re Glen Rock, supra, or Woodside Homes, Inc. v.
Disagreed with by Freehold Borough v. Freehold Tp., 193 N.J. Super. 724 (1984)Cited 3 timesPublishedAmerican Pig Iron Storage Co. v. State Board of Assessors
56 N.J.L. 389 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1894
Cook Stock., §§ 9, 192, and note 4; Farrer v. Walker, 3 Dill. 506 ; Burr v. Wilcox, 22 N. Y. 591 ; Wheeler v. Miller, 90 Id. 353. … Evening Journal Association v. State Board, 18 Vroom 36 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedGalloway Township Board of Education v. Galloway Township Education Ass'n
78 N.J. 25 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 1, 1978
A. v. … Services v. N. Y. S. Public Employment Relations Board, 41 N. Y. 2d 753, 395 N. Y. S. 2d 439, 363 N. E. 2d 1174 (1977) relied upon by the Board.
Cited 41 timesPublishedFair Lawn Education Ass'n v. Fair Lawn Board of Education
79 N.J. 574 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1979
Ass’n v. Maywood Bd. of Ed., 131 N. J. Super. 551 (Ch. Div. 1974); Camden v. Dicks, 135 N. J. Super. 559 (Law Div. 1975); N. J. Civil Service Ass’n v. Mayor and City of Camden, 135 N. J. Super. 308 (Law Div. 1975). … Corp. v. Rent Control Bd. of W. New York, 71 N. J. 451 (1976); Summer v. Teaneck, 53 N. J. 548 (1969).
Cited 41 timesPublishedCity of Garfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals
132 N.J.L. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1944
The presumption is in favor of. the findings of the State Board and such findings will not be disturbed in the Supreme Court unless it appears that the Board was in error. Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 N. J. … L. 174; affirmed, 123 Id. 200; Gannon v. State Board, 123 Id. 450. The Supreme Court, in an exhaustive opinion reported in 131 N. J.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAmerican Dream at Marlboro, LLC v. Planning Board of Marlboro
231 N.J. 202 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedEstelle v. Board of Education of Borough of Red Bank
14 N.J. 256 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 1954
It is, of course, axiomatic that jurisdiction cannot be bestowed by consent or acquiescence, Hofmann v. Jinks, 134 N. J. Eq. 91, 96 *261 (E. & A. 1943); Brown v. Allied Plumbing and Heating Co., 130 N. J. … L. 150 (E. & A. 1936); Air-Way Branches Inc. v. Board of Review, 10 N. J. 609, 614 (1952).
Cited 35 timesPublishedFinn v. Municipal Council of Clifton
136 N.J.L. 34 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 10, 1947
R. 766; Brown v. Terhune, 125 N. J. L. 618. … Brown v. Terhune, supra; Jersey Triangle Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, 127 N. J. L. 194. The ordinance under attack in Section 1 prohibits gasoline service stations in residential districts.
Cited 17 timesPublishedPlainfield-Union Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
6 N.J. Misc. 267 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1928
A claim for interest on the amortization of the difference in rates was asked by the prosecutor and disallowed by the board. We think this disallowance is supported by the case of Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. … This question has been considered and disposed of in the case of Middlesex Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey, 6 N. J. Mis.
Cited 4 timesPublishedAtlantic & Suburban Railway Co. v. State Board of Assessors
80 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 1910
Commonwealth v. Wilkinson, 16 Pick. 175 ; Pickard v. Howe, 53 Mass. 198 ; Peoples T. and T. Co. v. Berks and D. T. Road, 199 Pa. St. 411. … Trustees v. Hoboken, 4 Vroom 13 ; De Groot v. Jersey City, 36 Id. 121; Pease v. Traction Company, 40 Id. 165, and cases there cited.
Cited 3 timesPublishedStudent Members of the Playcrafters v. Board of Education
88 N.J. 74 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1981
Cited 1 timesPublishedAskam v. Board of Education of West New York
116 N.J.L. 416 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936
Cited 1 timesPublishedOxford Board of Trade v. Oxford Iron & Steel Co.
81 N.J.L. 694 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1911
For the purpose, doubtless, of encouraging the locating of manufacturing interests at Oxford, the board of trade of that municipality conveyed the locus in quo to the grantee by a deed of conveyance in fee, with a condition … Southard v. Central Railroad, 2 Dutcher 20; McKelway v. Seymour, 5 Id. 328.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Cleveland v. Board of Finance & Taxation
38 N.J.L. 259 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1876
Walter v. Union, 4 Vroom 350 ; State v. City of Newark, 3 Dutcher 185 ; State, Ruckman, v. Demarest, 3 Vroom 528 ; Campbell v. City of Kenosha, 5 Wall. 194 ; City v. Lamson, 9 Ib. 477 ; Cooley’s Const. Lim. 371, &c. … Hawes, 37 Barb. 440 ; Plimpton v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedGreat Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Board of Commissioners
122 N.J.L. 47 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1939
Heetner v. Newark, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 560. See, also, Siciliano v. Township of Neptune, 83 N. J. L. 158; Nutley v. Brandt, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 670. … Kolb v. Boonton, 64 N. J. L. 163; Van Der Vliet v. Newark, 112 Id. 39.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna