Case law

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Mayor of Jersey City

81 N.J.L. 290 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1911

Essex Road Board, 8 Id. 335, 338; State, Graham, prosecutor, v. Paterson, Id. 380, 385; Long Branch Commission v. Dobbins, 32 Id. 659), as well as implied in section 13 of the Certiorari act of 1903. Pamph. L., p. 347. … Elizabeth v. Meeker, 16 Vroom 157 , 160. If the assessment appears to be just and fair, but is set aside only for irregularity in procedure, the court may adopt it as its own. Brown v.

Walker v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

83 N.J.L. 695 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1912

That such an employment judged by the nature of its duties, as shown by a stipulation, is not an office is clear from our decisions which are collected in the opinion recently filed in the case of Fredericks v. … The duties appertaining to the clerkship in question are performed by an agent employed by the board and not by virtue of any office recognized by this act.

Di Paolo v. Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders

162 N.J. 572 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 2000

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

45 N.J.L. 173 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1883

On proceedings instituted in February, 1882, the Supreme Court in December, 1882, awarded a mandamus, directing the board of chosen freeholders of Hudson' county to insert this sum in the tax levy for 1883, but refused to … The case is similar to, but stronger for the defendants in error than that of Beals v. Supervisors of Amador County, 28 Cal. 449 .

Acquackanonk Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

97 N.J.L. 366 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 15, 1922

There follows the view of the board as to the law, and last my view. … That the board has no power to affect the rates of the East Jersey Water Company because the rates are all regulated by contract, and the board is without jurisdiction to disregard these contracts.

In Re Friedland

95 N.J. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1984

He further claimed that respondent had not received proper notice of the Committee hearing, although he admitted that Raymond Brown, attorney of record, had received appropriate notice. … Brown advised to the contrary. The Committee thereafter concluded that respondent had violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6).

West Shore Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

92 N.J.L. 332 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 1918

State Board v. Central R. R. Co., 48 N. J. L. 146. … The contention thus made is not without some color of support, in view of the adjudication of this court in Gillen v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 91 N. J. L. 76; Johnson v. City of Passaic, ID., and Borden v.

Skouras Theatres Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

123 N.J.L. 52 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 8, 1939

Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 101 N. J. L. 371. … “The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals will not be disturbed on certiorari on questions of fact, unless the evidence is persuasive that the board erred in its determinations.” Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 N. J.

City of Clifton v. State Board of Tax Appeals

136 N.J.L. 213 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 25, 1947

Clifton v. … This transaction is significant in view of the decisions in West Ridgelawn Cemetery v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 124 N. J.

United Advertising Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of Maplewood

136 N.J.L. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 30, 1947

Fonda v. O’Donohue, 109 N. J. L. 584; 163 Atl. Rep. 2 ; Cook v. Board of Adjustment of Trenton, 118 N. J. L. 372; 193 Atl. Rep. 191 . … Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365 ; 47 S. Ct. 114 ; 71 L. Ed. 303 ; Nectow v. Cambridge, 277 U. S. 183 ; 48 S. Ct. 447 ; 72 L. Ed. 842 ; Mansfield & Swett, Inc., v. West Orange, 120 N. J. L. 145.

Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, Dept. of Labor

114 N.J. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 1989

The Board of Review upheld this decision. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board’s decision in Yardville v. Board of Review, 222 N.J.Super. 201 (1988). … II The Attorney General, representing the Board of Review, concedes that under Self v.

Board of Education v. New Jersey Department of Education

183 N.J. 264 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 2005

In Abbott v. … Abbott v.

Township of Piscataway v. State Board of Tax Appeals

131 N.J.L. 158 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 1944

Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

31 N.J. 420 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1960

It is true that practical equality (somewhat short of the ideal; *429 see City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 18 N. … As we have this day decided, City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 31 N.

Gill v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH BRUNSWICK

957 N.J. 461 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 5, 2008

957 A.2d 1171 (2008) 957 N.J. 461 GILL v. PLANNING BOARD OF TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH BRUNSWICK. C-44 September Term 2008 62,575 Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 5, 2008. Petition for certification. Denied.

City of Jersey City v. State Board of Tax Appeals

133 N.J.L. 202 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 29, 1945

State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad Co., 48 N. J. L. 146; 4 Atl. Rep. 578 ; Cf. Bergen and, Dundee Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. L. 742; 67 Atl. … State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad Co., supra; Cf. Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N. J. L. 353, 360, 361; 19 Atl. Rep. (2d) 40.

Wilmar Co. v. County of Camden

107 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1930

The first resolution of the board of freeholders passed at the meeting of December 27th, 1929, vacates a portion of Browning road. The second resolution authorized the execution of a socalled escrow agreement. … Moore v. Haddonfield, 62 N. J. L. 386, 389.

B.R. Waldron Sons Co., Inc. v. Milk Control Board

131 N.J.L. 388 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 9, 1944

Borough of Haworth v. State Board of Tax Appeals

127 N.J.L. 67 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1941

Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 122 N. J. L. 596; 7 Atl. Rep. (2d) 628. … Turnley v. Elizabeth, 76 N. J. L. 42; 68 Atl. Rep. 1094 . Cf. New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 123 N. J. L. 303; 8 Atl. *70 Rep. (2d) 350.

Town of Kearny v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

103 N.J.L. 699 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1927