Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.83s

  • Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n v. Board of Education

    3 N.J. Misc. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 1925

    For the writ, counsel rely upon ‘the class of authorities illustrated by New Jersey Southern Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, 39 N. J. L. 28; Jersey City v. Montclair Railroad, 35 Id. 328; New York, &c., Railroad v. … In the New York and Long Branch Railroad Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, Dept. of Labor

    114 N.J. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 23, 1989

    The Board of Review upheld this decision. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board’s decision in Yardville v. Board of Review, 222 N.J.Super. 201 (1988). … II The Attorney General, representing the Board of Review, concedes that under Self v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • Township of Washington v. Mercer County Board of Taxation

    85 N.J.L. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1914

    Having made such changes as in their judgment may be necessary for the purpose aforesaid, the act provides: “The county board of taxation (4 Comp. … Their powers are entirely statutory, and their acts necessarily must consist with, the powers thus delegated, or with such powers as, e-v necessitate, arise out of and from the express provisions of the act prescribing their

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry v. Terry

    73 N.J.L. 156 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1905

    1898, p. 119) subjects to the penalty any person practicing dentistry, not being at the time legally licensed to practice as such in this state (section 12), and gives a right of action to recover the penalty to the state board

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    96 N.J.L. 184 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1921

    Vreeland v. Bayonne, 60 N. J. L. 168; Beecher v. Board of Street and Water Commissioners, 65 Id. 307; Tuckerton Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 77 Id. 614. … And in tho later case of Collingswood Sewerage Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • B. R. Waldron & Sons Co. v. Milk Control Board

    131 N.J.L. 267 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1944

    State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 504. It is the imperative duty of the director to enforce the statutory policy.' … Reid v. Colorado, 187 U. S. 137 ; 23 S. Ct. 92 ; 47 L. Ed. 108 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN v. Witmer

    200 N.J. 547 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 2009

    985 A.2d 646 (2009) 200 N.J. 547 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN v. WITMER. No. C-450 September Term 2009, 064827 Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 16, 2009. Petition for Certification Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Jersey City v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    133 N.J.L. 202 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 29, 1945

    State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad Co., 48 N. J. L. 146; 4 Atl. Rep. 578 ; Cf. Bergen and, Dundee Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. L. 742; 67 Atl. … State Board of Assessors v. Central Railroad Co., supra; Cf. Jersey City v. Martin, 126 N. J. L. 353, 360, 361; 19 Atl. Rep. (2d) 40.

    Modified by City of Jersey City v. Kelly, 134 N.J.L. 239 (1946)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Joye v. Hunterdon Central Regional High School Board of Education

    176 N.J. 568 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 9, 2003

    Our disposition is in accord with Desilets v. Clearview Regional Board of Education, 265 N.J.Super. 370 , 627 A.2d 667 (App.Div. 1993). … Abbott v. Burke, 119 N.J. 287, 372 , 575 A.2d 359 (1990) (Abbott II). We have given the Board’s policy the careful scrutiny urged by plaintiffs.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    81 N.J.L. 363 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1911

    Messenger v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 7 Vroom 407 ; Atchison T. &. S. F. Ry. v. D. & N. O. R., 110 U. S. 667 . … to support reasonably such order or that the same was without the jurisdiction of the board.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Township of Stafford v. Stafford Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

    154 N.J. 62 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1998

    Ass’n. v. Board of Educ., 99 N.J. 8, 21 , 489 A.2d 1148 (1985) (quoting Darrow v. Hanover Township, 58 N.J. 410, 413 , 278 A.2d 200 (1971)); see also Fischer v. Canario, 143 N.J. 235, 243 , 670 A.2d 516 (1996). … V.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • G.G.A. Realty Corp. v. Board, C., Jersey City

    135 N.J.L. 427 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 25, 1947

    Shaiman v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, 15 N. J. Mis. R. 437; 191 Atl. Rep. 735 ; Cook v. Board of Adjustment of Trenton, 118 N. J. L. 372; 193 Atl. Rep. 191 ; St. Mary’s, &c., Church v. … Board of Adjustment of City of New Brunswick, 14 N. J. Mis. R. 288; 184 Atl. Rep. 516 ; Schnell v. Township Committee of Township of Ocean, 120 N. J. L. 194; 198 Atl. Rep. 759 ; Peterson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ridgefield Park Education Ass'n v. Ridgefield Park Board of Education

    78 N.J. 144 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 2, 1978

    In Tp. of West Windsor v. PERC, 78 N. … Local 140 v. Mercer Cty. Impr. Authority, supra; Group Health Insurance v. Howell, supra, 40 N. J. at 445; N. J. Dept. of Trans. v. Brzoska, 139 N. J. Super. 510, 513 (App. Div. 1976).

    Cited 130 timesPublished
  • In Re Friedland

    95 N.J. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1984

    He further claimed that respondent had not received proper notice of the Committee hearing, although he admitted that Raymond Brown, attorney of record, had received appropriate notice. … Brown advised to the contrary. The Committee thereafter concluded that respondent had violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hill v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN

    91 N.J. 233 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1982

    HILL v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN, NEW JERSEY. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 8, 1982. Petition for certification denied. (See 183 N.J. Super. 36 )

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Borough of Kenilworth v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

    78 N.J.L. 439 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1909

    The difficulty we find in the claim of the plaintiff in error is that it failed to object to the apportionment of taxes by the county board of taxation before that board. … Our views are supported by an opinion of the Supreme Court in Township of Delaware v. Assessors of Taxes, 24 Vroom 319 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Matturri v. Board of Trustees of the Judicial Retirement System

    173 N.J. 368 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 2002

    Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999) (quoting Smith v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 108 N.J. 19, 25 , 527 A.2d 843 (1987)). … Sherman v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • New Jersey School & Church Furniture Co. v. Board of Education

    58 N.J.L. 646 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1896

    Golden v. Knapp, 12 Vroom 215 . And in the case of Quin v. Moore, 15 N. … “And the said Board of Education agrees to pay to the order of said New Jersey School and Church Furniture Co. therefor, the sum of $510. “ (Signed) A. G.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • West Shore Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    92 N.J.L. 332 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 1918

    State Board v. Central R. R. Co., 48 N. J. L. 146. … The contention thus made is not without some color of support, in view of the adjudication of this court in Gillen v. Essex County Board of Taxation, 91 N. J. L. 76; Johnson v. City of Passaic, ID., and Borden v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of Review

    41 N.J. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 4, 1963

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.