Case law

Holden v. Board of Education of City of Elizabeth

46 N.J. 281 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1966

State Board of Education, 303 U. S. 624 [ 58 S. Ct. 752 , 82 L. Ed. 1087 ] (1938); Gabrielli v. Knickerbocker, et al., 306 U. S. 621 [ 59 S. Ct. 786 , 83 L. Ed. 1026 ] (1939), a summary decision in Johnson, et al. v. … The Supreme Court in West Virginia Board of Education v.

State ex rel. Board of Health v. White

90 N.J. Eq. 621 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1919

Lowrie v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry

90 N.J.L. 54 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1917

White v. Neptune City, 56 N. J. L. 222; Board of Health v. Cattell, 73 Id. 516; Tenement House Board v. Gruber, 79 Id. 257. … Freeman v. United States, 217 U. S. 539 . The report of this case in 19 Ann. Cos. 755 has a valuable note collecting the authorities.

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 672 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917

School District of Wildwood v. State Board of Education

116 N.J.L. 572 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1936

board of education of Wildwood in dismissing two tenure teachers upon the sole ground that they were married women, and directing their reinstatement. … We agree with the decision of the commissioner and of the board.

Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

107 N.J.L. 420 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1931

Lowrie v. Board, 90 N. J. L. 54; State Board *422 v. Giedroyc, 91 Id. 61; State Board v. O’Neill, 6 N. J. Mis. R. 1075; 143 Atl. Rep. 814 . … State Board v. Buettel, 102 N. J. L. 74. Reasons 8, 9 and 17 assert that the act is an unreasonable exercise of the police power. Our view, and we think that of courts generally, is to the contrary.

Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

112 N.J.L. 559 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1934

Butterfoss v. State ex rel. Board of Health

40 N.J. Eq. 325 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1885

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 5, 1917

before the board to support reasonably such order, or that the same was without the jurisdiction of the board." … Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 81 N. J.

Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

98 N.J.L. 41 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 7, 1922

Public Service Co. v. Public Utility Board, 84 N. J. L. 463; affirmed, 87 Id. 705; Eliza *43 bethtown Gas Light Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commis sioners, 95 Id. 18. … The board relies upon the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Galveston Electric Co. v. Galveston, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 351, but this view of the effect of that decision seems erroneous. Mr.

Arimex Consolidated Copper Co. v. State Board of Assessors

69 N.J.L. 121 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1903

In the year 1900 the state board of assessors assessed the franchise tax of the prosecutor, under the Corporation Tax act of April 18th, 1894 (Gen. … While the Corporation Tax act requires each corporation to furnish to the board an annual return of such information as the board may desire to carry out the law, it does not make that return the legal basis of the tax.

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

85 N.J.L. 420 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1914

Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 55 Vroom. 463. … Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Rail *423 road Co. v. Public Utility Commissioners, 54 Vroom 212 .

City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 407 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1941

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; affirmed, 124 Id. 451. … We conclude that the valuation fixed by the County Board should stand, namely, land $8,500, improvements $5,000, total $13,500. The judgment of the State Board will, therefore, be reversed, but without costs.

Clarence Haley v. Board of Review (084123) (Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 17, 2021

And, unlike the claimant in Fennell v. Board of Review, 297 N.J. Super. 319 (App. … The Board further argues that the Appellate Division decision does not conflict with DeLorenzo v. Board of Review, 100 N.J. Super. 473, 476 (App.

Rachel A. Parsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education(075859)

226 N.J. 297 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 17, 2016

Parsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education (A-69-14) (075859) Argued April 12, 2016 -- Decided August 17, 2016 FERNDANDEZ-VINA J., writing for a unanimous Court. … State v.

Remington Cash Register Co. v. State Board of Taxes

8 N.J. Misc. 875 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 22, 1930

Upon appeal, the county board of taxation, and the state board of taxes and assessment, affirmed the assesment. … It was urged before such boards, and here, that the sales, being conditional, the title was in the vendee subject to being divested for non-payment of the installments of consideration and that the transactions were analogous

State Board of Medical Examiners v. De Young

4 N.J. Misc. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

This is an appeal from a conviction under the statute relating to the practice of medicine without a license, and the appeal will be dismissed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the per curiam of this court in State Board … v.

Denise Brown v. State of New Jersey (076656) (Cumberland County and Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 2017

Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

112 N.J.L. 215 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1934

Justice Parker, in the case of Atlantic City Railroad v. Pleasantville, 99 N. J. L. 328; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals), 100 N. J. … So much of the orders of the state board as passed upon the facts involved in the petitions are approved and confirmed, and the board is directed to issue its orders in accordance therewith. (Dissenting opinion by Mr.

Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

100 N.J.L. 177 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 17, 1924