Case law

Newark Brass Works v. State Board of Assessors

63 N.J.L. 500 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 12, 1899

The ground on which it is insisted that this tax should be paid is that it failed to make an annual return to the state board of assessors as required by the statute. … for such information as will enable the state board to carry out the provisions of the act.

Brewing Improvement Co. v. State Board of Assessors

65 N.J.L. 466 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1900

This certiorari brings up the tax against the prosecutor, reported by the state board of assessor0 to the comptroller on June 5th, 1899, pursuant to the Corporation Tax act. Gen. Siat., p. 3335. … The statute does not designate any day as that on which the capital stock is to form the basis of the tax, nor does it authorize the board of assessors to designate such a day.

State ex rel. MacFarland v. Board of Education

45 N.J.L. 100 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1883

L. 1868, p. 499,) establishes a board of education for said city. … The bestowal of these powers shows that it was the purpose of the charter to substitute, in- the city, the board of education for the board of trustees elected in school districts under the general law.

Megie v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Morris

84 N.J.L. 159 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 3, 1913

The board of chosen freeholders of the county of Morris, being called upon to build a bridge over part of Lake Hopatcong, refused to comply, and thereupon the relators caused to be issued an alternative writ of mandamus. … , then the board may, by resolution, to be adopted in like manner, order and provide for and proceed with the erection of such bridge.

Bederski v. Policemen's & Firemen's Pension Board of Newark

104 N.J.L. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 17, 1927

Spring Brook Gardens, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

137 N.J.L. 398 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 15, 1948

Based on the refusal of the Board of Adjustment to find unnecessary hardship, the Township Committee refused to grant the variance. … Brandon v. Montclair, 124 N. J. L. 135. We have no difficulty in finding that the action of the Board of Adjustment in not making a finding of unnecessary hardship was arbitrary and without any proof to sustain it.

Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Board of Education

130 N.J.L. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1943

The Board of Education of Paterson awarded a contract for the construction of a public school in that city. … Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. Aetna Casualty, &c., Co., 110 N. J. L. 592; John P. Callaghan, Inc., v. Continental Casualty Co., Id. 390; Johnson Service Co. v.

Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Board of Education

131 N.J.L. 33 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1943

In Silverthorne v. Warren Railroad Co., 33 N. J. L. 173 (at p. 178), the Supreme Court stated that *34 an attack by demurrer was preferable. Cf. Gallager v. Board of Public Works, &c., 45 Id. 465; Byron v. … A demurrer to the writ interposed on behalf of the Board of Education was overruled. Williamsport Planing Mill Co. v. Board of Education of Paterson, 130 Id. 321.

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. State Board of Taxes

1 N.J. Misc. 596 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1923

State Board of Assessors, 89 N. J. … This seems to complete the detailed survey of the items v challenged. "Rules in conformity with these views may be entered in the several cases.

Town of Union v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

77 N.J.L. 178 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1908

of equalization of taxes, as provided in the act establishing such board (Pamph. … , to the state board.

Overlook Terrace Management Corp. v. Rent Control Board

69 N.J. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1975

Federal Paper Board Co. v. Borough of Bogota

66 N.J. 317 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 1, 1974

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

13 N.J. Misc. 766 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 11, 1935

The decision of the board was dated March 6th, 1934, and the order was issued on March 22d, 1934. … On June 13th, 1934, the board denied the application.

Borough of Chatham v. Board of Conservation & Development

7 N.J. Misc. 958 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1929

So again with respect to the advertising effected by the board. … The order of the board of conservation and development is affirmed.

E. & M. Land Co. v. Board of Adjustment

4 N.J. Misc. 469 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1926

The action of the board in affirming the action of the superintendent of buildings of the city of Newark in refusing to issue the permit to the prosecutor is set aside, with costs.

State ex rel. Board of Freeholders v. Heppenheimer

67 N.J.L. 164 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1901

L., p. 138), it was provided “that the sum of one dollar per week for each county patient confined in any county lunatic asylum established by the board of chosen freeholders of such county shall be paid by the state treasurer … , on the warrant of the comptroller, to the director of such board of chosen freeholders upon a statement to be furnished by him, giving the number of such county patients which may have been thus supported in said asylum

Cardiff v. New Jersey State Board of Architects

69 N.J.L. 172 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1903

payment to the said board of a regular fee of five dollars.” … Cardiff of the action of the board,” &c.

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

116 N.J.L. 527 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936

If this matter is properly before the court it is controlled by the result reached by us in Pennsylvania Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 116 N. J. L. 415, thus calling for an affirmance. … Johnson v. Board, &c., 107 N. J. L. 380; Frazier Co. v. Long Beach et al., 110 Id. 221; Post v. Anderson et al., 111 Id. 303. The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Lichtman v. Board of Health of Deptford Twp.

128 N.J.L. 416 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 1942

His present application was refused because he had previously been convicted of keeping swine without a permit and, secondly, because the Board of Health did not intend to issue more permits. … Spur Distributing Co. v. Bridgeton, 122 N. J. L. 460. Restrictions upon the production of food should not be countenanced. Relator may have a peremptory writ, with costs.

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 673 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917