Case law

State ex rel. Board of Health v. Ihnken

72 N.J. Eq. 865 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

of Health v. … Ruckman v. Ransom, 35 N. J. Law (6 Vr.) 565; Hotel Registry Corporation v. Stafford, 70 N. J. Law (41 Vr.) 528. And this is peculiarly true with reference to statutes enacted at the same session of the legislature.

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

84 N.J.L. 759 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1913

Co. v. Public Utility Board, ante p. 619. For affirmance — Tire Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, SwAYZE, VOORHEES, KalISGIT, BOGERT, CONGDON, Wirrrií, Tert-tune, JJ. 10. For reversal — iSTone.

Yellow Pine Co. v. State Board of Assessors

70 N.J.L. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1904

Essex County Welfare Board v. Department of Institutions & Agencies

75 N.J. 232 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1978

C. 10:81-1.1 et seq.; Redding v. Burlington Cty. Welf. Bd., 65 N. J. 439, 442 (1974). … Reed v. New York State Dept. of Social Services, 78 Misc. 2d 266 , 354 N. Y. S. 2d 389, 394 (Sup. Ct. 1974).

City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

63 N.J. 566 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1973

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

109 N.J.L. 264 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1932

Hines v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners

132 N.J.L. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1944

Cutley v. State Highway Commission, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 991. However, we have considered the merits. … Harker v. Bayonne, 85 N. J. L. 176. The writ will be dismissed.

Orrok v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson

123 N.J.L. 488 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1939

J. H. Realty Co. v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 540 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

The prosecutor appealed to the board of adjustment, which board affirmed the action of the building inspector in refusing the permit. … We find nothing in the facts of this case which distinguish them from those facts which appeared in the case of Eeldman & Pivnick, Incorporated, v.

Barnegat Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assesment

98 N.J.L. 857 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1923

State ex rel. Chernin v. Board of Commissioners

1 N.J. Misc. 421 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 1923

The contention made in behalf of the board of commissioners of the town of Nutley for a rehearing is that the decision rendered in this case is in conflict with the opinion of this court in the case of Buohl v. … It will be observed that there is a distinction between the case of Buohl v. Beverly and the present case. In Buohl v.

Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

1 N.J. Misc. 482 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 22, 1923

The reasons filed in the ease amount to these: First, that the board refused to consider certain evidence about the cost involved in placing of cars at the mine known as the Cannon mine, and secondly, that the board, after … The board was entitled to consider the Mountain View rate as evidential on the general subject, and it is not to be assumed that it was considered as in any way controlling.

Taber v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry

137 N.J.L. 161 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1948

Dent v. West Virginia, 139 U. S. 114 ; 32 L. Ed. 623 ; 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 231; Hawker v. New York, 170 U. S. 189 ; 42 L. Ed. 1002 ; 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 573; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505 ; 47 L. Ed. 563 ; 23 Sup. Ct. … Rep. 390; Watson v. Maryland, 218 U. S. 173 ; 54 L. Ed. 987 ; 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 644; Collins v. Texas, 223 U. S. 288 ; 56 L. Ed. 439 ; 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 286; McNaughton v. Johnson, 242 U. S. 344 ; 61 L. Ed. 352 .

Hankin v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP

25 N.J. 489 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1957

HANKIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 16, 1957. Mr. William Henry Lawton for the petitioner. Messrs.

Trump Castle Hotel & Casino v. Board of Review

126 N.J. 306 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 2, 1991

Newark Fire Insurance v. State Board of Tax Appeals

118 N.J.L. 525 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 31, 1937

Newark v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 118 N. J. L. 131; 191 Atl. Rep. 843 . We are, of course, under section 11 of our Certiorari act (1 Comp. … The judgment of the state board of tax appeals is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington v. White

92 N.J.L. 251 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1918

S. W. & D. W. v. Board of Education

91 N.J. 234 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1982

Dunellen Board of Education v. Dunellen Education Ass'n

62 N.J. 188 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1972

Van Der Weide v. Board of Public Works

4 N.J. Misc. 521 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 28, 1926

Mead v. Passaic, 2 N. J. Mis. R. 953. … On this phase of the case Mead v. Passaic, supra, is also in point. The ordinance will be set aside, with costs.