Case law

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

13 N.J. Misc. 768 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 21, 1935

The board then changed this date to January 19th, 1935. … The reasons for the continuance are substantially the same reasons which were urged on rule to show cause why certiorari should not issue in the case of Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v.

Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

106 N.J.L. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 3, 1930

Clawson v. Thompson, 20 N. J. … Railroad Co. v.

Town of Kearny v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

103 N.J.L. 541 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1927

Kearny v. State Board, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 834. This normally required *542 that the case go back to the state board for a retrial conducted according to the principles laid down. … L. 88; Rayner v. Benjamin, 88 Id. 83, 86; Manufacturers’ Land Co. v. Board, 98 Id. 638, 642.

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

84 N.J.L. 764 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1913

Co. v. Public Utility Board, ante p. 619. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, SvAYZE, VOORHEES, IvALISCH, BOGERT, CONGDON, Wi-ute, Teri-iune, JJ. 10. ■ For reversal — None.

Central Railroad v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

75 N.J.L. 737 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1907

Since that decision this court has decided that the state board has not the power claimed for it. Jersey City v. Board of Equalization, 45 Vroom 753 . … Tuckerton Railroad Co. v. State Board of Assessors, ante p. 157.

Borough of Verona v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

89 N.J.L. 373 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1916

National House & Farms Ass'n v. Board of Adjustment

137 N.J.L. 542 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 2, 1948

Rep. (2d) 598; Gabrielson v. Glen Ridge, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 142; Nusser v. Board of Adjustment of Newark, 134 N. J. L. 174; 46 Atl. Rep. (2d) 657; United Advertising Corp. v. … Board of Adjustment of Maplewood Township, 136 N. J. L. 336; 56 Atl. Rep. (2d) 406.

Interboro Trucking Co., Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

135 N.J.L. 520 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 22, 1947

About a year prior to the denial of the variance, the Zoning Board of the *521 City oi Perth Amboy by appropriate resolution permitted the prosecutor to extend its then existing garage to the east. … Scaduto v. Bloomfield, 127 N. J. L. 1. The writ of certiorari is dismissed, with costs.

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

116 N.J.L. 415 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Sheridan

45 N.J.L. 276 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1883

The manner in which the state tax for school purposes is to be ascertained and assessed is so fully exposed in the cases of State v. Cox, Collector, 9 Vroom 302 , and Board of Education of Elizabeth v. … The board of assessors apportions each county’s portion among the cities and townships constituting taxing districts within the county.

Lumberville Delaware Bridge Co. v. State Board of Assessors

55 N.J.L. 529 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1893

Guy v. Baltimore, 100 U. S. 434 ; Webber v. Virginia, 103 Id. 344; Walling v. Michigan, 116 Id. 446; Asher v. Texas, 128 Id. 129; Stoutenburgh v. Hennick, 129 Id. 141. 2. … S. 232 ; Railroad Company v. Husen, 95 Id. 465 ; Cook v. Pennsylvania, 97 Id. 566; Brown v. Houston, 114 Id. 622; Lyng v. Michigan, 135 Id. 161. *535 3.

City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation

27 N.J. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 25, 1958

City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 18 N. J. 371 (1955), and the companion case of Borough of Little Ferry v. Bergen County Board of Taxation, 18 N. … Co. v. Neeld, 23 N. J. 561, 572 (1957).

Mayor of Newark v. State Board of Taxation

67 N.J.L. 246 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 1902

This- franchise is property, and taxable as such (State Board of Assessors v. … Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey, 19 Vroom 146 ); but, under present legislation, the right to tax it has been reserved by the state to itself, through *247 its state board of assessors, and not delegated to the several

Essex County Welfare Board v. Department of Institutions & Agencies

75 N.J. 232 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 5, 1978

C. 10:81-1.1 et seq.; Redding v. Burlington Cty. Welf. Bd., 65 N. J. 439, 442 (1974). … Reed v. New York State Dept. of Social Services, 78 Misc. 2d 266 , 354 N. Y. S. 2d 389, 394 (Sup. Ct. 1974).

Household Finance Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

119 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 24, 1937

Newark v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 118 N. J. L. 131; 191 Atl. Rep. 843 ; Newark Fire Insurance Co. v. … Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 119 N. J. L. 164.

State ex rel. Miller v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J.L. 501 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1896

The relator applies for a mandamus directed to the defendants, commanding them to admit him as a member of the board from the borough of Vineland. … now regulating the election and length of terms of members of said board of chosen freeholders. “ 7.

Commercial Trust Co. v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

86 N.J.L. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 30, 1914

Mason, v. McClave, 99 N. Y. *432 83, 89, 90 . It is rejected when it leads to conflict with the legislative intent. McCormick v. Village of West Duluth, 50 N. W. Rep. 128 ; State v. Bates, 104 Id. 709; People v. … Fidelity Trust Co. v. Vogt, 66 N. J. L. 86. 'The provision in section 6, last cited, then requires the county board to ascertain the true value of the whole number of shares issued and outstanding.

Hines v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners

132 N.J.L. 73 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1944

Cutley v. State Highway Commission, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 991. However, we have considered the merits. … Harker v. Bayonne, 85 N. J. L. 176. The writ will be dismissed.

Orrok v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson

123 N.J.L. 488 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1939

J. H. Realty Co. v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 540 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

The prosecutor appealed to the board of adjustment, which board affirmed the action of the building inspector in refusing the permit. … We find nothing in the facts of this case which distinguish them from those facts which appeared in the case of Eeldman & Pivnick, Incorporated, v.