Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

2.28s

  • City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    127 N.J.L. 5 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1941

    Colonial Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N. J. L. 126. The valuation thus placed upon the land 'by the local assessor is at the rate of $52 per front foot. … See Colonial Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, supra. The lot in question has a frontage of 235.28 feet, and a depth of 508 feet on one side and 613 feet on the other.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Borough of Verona v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    88 N.J.L. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1915

    The supplement of 1870 specifically authorized the board to purchase or take any turnpike road. (Section 16.) Van Riper v. Essex Public Road Board, 38 N. J. L. 23. … In Moore v. Haddonfield, 62 N. J. L. 386, the Court of Errors and Appeals said: “As to all public rights in the street, the mu *58 nicipal action was clearly legislative.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Blair Academy v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    106 N.J.L. 556 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hoboken Board of Education v. Hoboken Teachers' Ass'n

    93 N.J. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Long Branch Education Ass'n v. Board of Education

    73 N.J. 461 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 24, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mc Nair v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    67 N.J. 99 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. B & L Tavern, Inc.

    42 N.J. 131 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 20, 1964

    As a result, he found lack of justification for the local Board’s refusal to renew the license and reversed the order. … The Board of Commissioners then sought a review in the Appellate Division which, after an exhaustive study of the evidence, sustained the Director by majority vote.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Piccadilly Ice Cream Co. v. Board of Commissioners

    24 N.J. Misc. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 17, 1946

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yellow Pine Co. v. State Board of Assessors

    70 N.J.L. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1904

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Health v. Ihnken

    72 N.J. Eq. 865 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 17, 1907

    of Health v. … Ruckman v. Ransom, 35 N. J. Law (6 Vr.) 565; Hotel Registry Corporation v. Stafford, 70 N. J. Law (41 Vr.) 528. And this is peculiarly true with reference to statutes enacted at the same session of the legislature.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    84 N.J.L. 759 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1913

    Co. v. Public Utility Board, ante p. 619. For affirmance — Tire Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, SwAYZE, VOORHEES, KalISGIT, BOGERT, CONGDON, Wirrrií, Tert-tune, JJ. 10. For reversal — iSTone.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnstone v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Passaic

    120 N.J.L. 184 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1938

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gulf Oil Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, Newark

    132 N.J.L. 435 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1945

    First Church of Christ Scientist v. Board of Adjustment, 127 N. J. L. 325; affirmed, 128 Id. 376. We think the factual situation in this- regard has not changed since that time.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Northern New Jersey Oil Co. v. Board of Adjustment

    6 N.J. Misc. 698 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 29, 1928

    A hearing was had before that board and a resolution was adopted by the board of adjustment denying the application, and affirming the action of the superintendent of buildings. … The action of the board of adjustment is affirmed and the writ of certiorari dismissed, with costs.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fidelity Trust Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

    77 N.J.L. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908

    The writ in this case runs to the board of equalization of taxes of New Jersey, to remove its judgment affirming the decision of the Essex county board of taxation, which, upon appeal to it, confirmed a tax assessment for … Standard Fire Insurance Co., 47 Vroom 79 ; Lippincott v. Lippincott, 46 Id. 795.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • City of Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    127 N.J.L. 105 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 26, 1941

    Princeton Country Day School v. State Board, &c., 113 N. J. L. 515, 517; 175 Atl. Rep. 136 ; Carteret Academy v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 102 N. J. L. 525; 133 Atl. Rep. 886 ; affirmed, 104 N. J. … Carteret Academy v. State Board, &c., supra (at p. 528).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Eagle Truck Transport, Inc. v. BOARD OF REVIEW, ETC.

    29 N.J. 280 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 10, 1959

    A. 43:21-2; Alexander v. N. J. Power & Light Co., 21 N. J. 373, 378 (1956); Valenti v. Board, of Review of U. C. C. of N. J., 4 N. J. 287, 292 (1950); Ford Motor Co. v. N. J. Dept. of Labor & Industry, 1 N. J. … Brown, B. R.-41945-C (1958), the Board of Review had construed the 1950 amendment of 5 (a) as requiring 'the purgative employment to be served in covered employment with a New Jersey employing unit.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Borough of Oakland v. Board of Conservation & Development

    98 N.J.L. 99 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 3, 1922

    Society, &c., v. Board of Conservation and Development, 90 N. J. L. 469; affirmed, 91 Id. 718. … L. 104; affirmed, 85 Id. 673; City of New Brunswick v. Board of Conservation and Development, 94 Id. 46; affirmed, Id. 558; Society, &c., v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

    63 N.J. 566 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1973

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Board of Commissioners v. Freehold & Atlantic Highlands Railroad

    74 N.J.L. 480 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 4, 1907

    Trustees, &c., v. Hoboken, 4 Vroom 1 ; Bayonne v. Ford, 14 Id. 292; Price v. Plainfield, 11 Id. 608; Gloucester Land Co. v. Gloucester City, 14 Id. 544. … Clark v. City of Elizabeth, 11 Id. 172; City of Elizabeth v. Price, 12 Id. 191; Clark v. City of Elizabeth, 8 Id. 120. In New York and Long Branch Railroad Co. v. South Amboy, Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.