Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.12s

  • E. & M. Land Co. v. Board of Adjustment

    4 N.J. Misc. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 13, 1926

    This is a certiorari bringing up “a certain decision rendered September 3d, 1925, by the board of adjustment of the city of Newark, New Jersey, relative to an appeal to said board by E. & M. … Scola v. Senior, 130 Atl. Rep. 882 ; Plymouth Co. v. Bigelow, 129 Id. 203; Jersey Land Co. v. Scott, 126 Id. 173. They, obviously, bore no relation to the public health, safety or the general welfare.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Fire Commissioners v. Elizabethtown Water Co.

    27 N.J. 192 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 26, 1958

    Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 11 N. J. 43, 50, 51 (1952). As the Board noted in applying the statute in the earlier case of Middletown v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 97 P. U. R., N. … J. 590, 600, 601 (1958); Nordco, Inc. v. State, 43 N. J. Super. 277, 283—286 (App. Div. 1957). The order of the Board is affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Board of Education of Gloucester City

    116 N.J.L. 448 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 14, 1936

    We agree with the Supreme Court that— “It is not material to the determination of this case that the solicitor of a board of education be regarded as an officer.” The judgment .under review is affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Packard-Bamberger Co., Inc. v. Board of Pharmacy

    135 N.J.L. 282 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1947

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors

    82 N.J.L. 21 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1911

    Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 49 Vroom 44 . This principle the state board has observed in making the present assessment. … This value the state board has assessed in the present case.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Swanson v. Planning Board of Township of Hopewell

    149 N.J. 59 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1997

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Township of Hamilton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    50 N.J. 394 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 20, 1967

    Plaintiffs’ action in lieu of prerogative writs challenged the validity of a resolution of the Atlantic County Board of Chosen Freeholders authorizing a 25-year lease of certain premises in Atlantic City in order to provide … On December 14, 1966 the board, after reviewing the work of its committee and consulting with the assignment judge, passed the resolution here under attack.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • SB Building Associates, L.P. v. Planning Board of Milltown

    230 N.J. 424 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners

    115 N.J.L. 115 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1935

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Essex County Park Commission

    62 N.J.L. 376 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1898

    Morris and Essex Railroad Co. v. Commissioners, 8 Vroom 228 ; Industrial School v. Whitehead, 2 Beas. 290; Vreeland v. Jersey City, 25 Vroom 49 ; Mechanics’ and Traders’ Bank v. Bridges, 1 Id. 112 ; New Brunswick v. … Williamson, 15 Id. 165 ; Brown v. Mullica Township, 19 Id. 447. The citations of cases elsewhere are collected in 23, Am. & Eng. Encycl. L. 492. .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation

    125 N.J.L. 431 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 10, 1940

    See Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board of Taxation, 124 N. J. L. 485, 486. That analysis clearly points out that there is no inconsistency between the pertinent provisions of the two acts. … State v. Czarnicki, 124 N. J. L. 43, 45; 10 All. Rep. (2d) 461; Devlin v. Cooper, 124 N. J. L. 155, 158; 11 Atl. Rep. (2d) 29.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. Diamond Paper Mills Co.

    64 N.J. Eq. 793 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1902

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sweeney v. Board of Review, Division of Employment Security

    43 N.J. 535 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 12, 1965

    The Legislature adopted an attitude of “neutrality,” i. e., that the fund may not be used, Febbi v. Board of Review, 35 N. J. 601, 606 (1961); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Board of Review, 25 N. … Board of Review, 8 N. J. Super. 71, 76 (App. Div. 1950); and the fact that there was a lockout rather than a strike is here of no moment. Mortensen v. Board of Review, 21 N. J. 242, 245-246 (1956); Schoenwiesner v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Paterson Milk & Cream Co. v. Milk Control Board

    118 N.J.L. 383 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 7, 1937

    Price fixing by a state milk control board was held constitutional in Nebbia v. New York, 291 U. S. 502 . It was settled in Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. … The milk control board was well within its rights in revoking prosecutor’s license for selling milk at a price less than that fixed by the board. The writ will be dismissed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Board of Health v. Jennings

    131 N.J. Eq. 511 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 5, 1942

    Board of Health of Hackensack v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen County, 46 N. J. Eq. 173; affirmed, 48 N. J. Eq. 294. … A. &6:$-6S provides: “In case no nuisance shall be found to exist, costs shall be awarded against the local board which caused the suit to be brought only in case it shall appear to the chancellor that no probable cause existed

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sands v. Board of Examiners of Electrical Contractors

    54 N.J. 484 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 17, 1969

    He thereupon sought a ruling from the Board of Examiners. … The appeal was argued before us at the same time as The Independent Electricians and Electrical Contractors’ Association of the State of New Jersey, et ais. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DeLorenzo v. Board of Review, Div. of Employment SEC.

    54 N.J. 361 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1969

    The Appellate Division disagreed, and following Stauhs v. Bd. of Review, 93 N. J. Super. 451 (App. … As to the question *364 whether a mere failure to work because of illness constitutes a quit within the intent of this statute, the Board said: “The Board of Review does not now hold that a failure to report for work because

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Essex County Board of Taxation v. City of Newark

    73 N.J. 69 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 1977

    Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Bor. of Edgewater, 68 N. J. 405, 410-411 (1975), cert. den. 425 U. S. 958 , 96 S. Ct. 1739 , 48 L. Ed. 2d 203 (1976); Tp. of Willingboro v. Burlington Cty. Bd. Tax., 62 N. … Van Riper v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 137 N. J. L. 714, 716 (E. & A. 1948); Boon Bros. v. Noonberg, 9 N. J. Misc. 138, 153 A. 98 (Sup. Ct. 1931).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Kasper v. Board of Trustees, Teacher Pension & Annuity Fund

    162 N.J. 661 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1999

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Fidelity Trust Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

    77 N.J.L. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 9, 1908

    The writ in this case runs to the board of equalization of taxes of New Jersey, to remove its judgment affirming the decision of the Essex county board of taxation, which, upon appeal to it, confirmed a tax assessment for … Standard Fire Insurance Co., 47 Vroom 79 ; Lippincott v. Lippincott, 46 Id. 795.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.