Case law

Township of Greenwich v. Gloucester County Board of Taxation

46 N.J. 55 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1965

Irval Realty Inc. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

61 N.J. 366 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 25, 1972

Ferry v. Williams, 41 N. J. L. 332 (Sup. Ct. 1879); Taxpayers Association v. City of Cape May, 2 N. J. Super. 27 (App. Div. 1949); Moore v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer County, 76 N. J. Super. 396 (App. … See Josefowicz v. Porter, 32 N. J. Super. 585, 591 (App. Div. 1954).

Christina Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of Elizabeth(074974)

224 N.J. 126 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 27, 2016

Christina Silviera-Francisco v. Board of Education of the City of Elizabeth (A-28-14) (074974) Argued October 27, 2015 -- Decided January 27, 2016 CUFF, P.J.A.D. … Programs v.

City of Clifton v. Passaic County Board of Taxation

28 N.J. 411 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1958

This is the principle by which equality of treatment and burden is had, City of Passaic v. Passaic County Board of Taxation, 18 N. J. 371 (1955); Delaware, Lackawanna and Western R. R. Co. v. Neeld, 23 N. … This reasoning overlooks the canon of interpretation, Commercial Trust Co. of New Jersey v. Hudson County Tax Board, 87 N. J.

M. L. Shoemaker & Co. v. Board of Health

82 N.J.L. 33 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 20, 1911

No power to impose license fees for revenue is given to boards of health. The prosecutor has shown sufficient injury peculiar to itself to entitle it to question the ordinance (Morgan v. … Central Railroad Co. v. Elizabeth, 41 Id. 578; Rosencrans v. Eatontown, 51 Id. 227. The ordinance is set aside, with costs.

American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions v. Bugbee

98 N.J.L. 84 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 8, 1922

Kenney the fund shall be held as a permanent fund to be invested and reinvested as the American board shall decide,” &c. … We think the facts of this case fall clearly within and are controlled by the principle enunciated in Carter v. Bugbee, 91 N. J. L. 438; 92 Id. 390.

Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

76 N.J.L. 402 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 29, 1908

Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Rahway, 46 Vroom 416 . … L. 1906, p. 211, § Wayne v. Laflin & Rand Powder Co., ante p. 175. ]_Since the passage of the act creating a county board of taxation (Pamph.

Board of Health v. Rosenthal

67 N.J.L. 216 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1901

It is objected further that the conviction does not expressly charge the creation and maintenance of a nuisance, as was held to be necessary in Morford v. Board of Health, &c., 39 Atl. Rep. 708 . … Lloyd v. Richman, 28 Vroom 385 . There being no error in the proceedings, the writ will be dismissed, with costs.

Board of Education v. Town Council of Montclair

76 N.J.L. 59 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1908

We have just decided, in the case of Montclair v. … by á contractor and a real estate expert than by a board made up of representatives of the board of education and the council.

Edwards v. Board of Freeholders

76 N.J.L. 454 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1908

Freeholders v. Hough, 26 Vroom 628 ; McKinley v. Chosen Freeholders, 2 Stew. Fq. 164. … Whitall v. Freeholders of Gloucester, 11 Vroom 302 ; 5 Cyc. 1079, and cases cited.

West Shore Railroad v. State Board of Assessors

82 N.J.L. 37 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 3, 1911

This exceeds by $300,000 the valuation of the state board of assessors. … The statute authorizes the board of assessors to use Iheir personal knowledge and judgment, and, as we have said in Central Railroad v.

Perth Amboy Trust Co. v. Board of Aldermen

75 N.J.L. 291 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 4, 1907

Board of Trustees v. Griffin

88 N.J.L. 111 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 4, 1915

Church v. Hoboken, 33 N. J. L. 13; Chicago v. Ward, 169 Ill. 392 ; St. Paul v. Chicago, &c., Ry. Co., 63 Minn. 330 ; Williams v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 16 N. Y. 97 ; 8 R. C. L. 911; 13 Cyc. 493, and cases cited. … Gleason v. Cleveland, 49 Ohio St. 431 ; Church v. Portland, 18 Oreg. 73 .

Fuller v. Board of Education

78 N.J.L. 107 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 22, 1909

The prosecutor now challenges the power of the board of education to condemn this land. … This not only appears from the separation of the two powers in the statute itself, but it was so held in the case of Griffith v.

Board of Health v. Cattell

73 N.J.L. 516 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 11, 1906

Cattell for violating section 36 of the rules of the board of health of the city of Wood-bury. The proceeding was begun by a complaint made by the secretary of the board of health, that he had mailed a notice to Mrs. … The question respecting the character of the proceeding seems to be put at rest in this court by the case of White v. Neptune City, 27 Vroom 222 .

Township of Mahwah v. Bergen County Board of Taxation

98 N.J. 268 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 14, 1985

Brown's Estate v. Town of Union, 62 N.J.L. 142 (Sup.Ct.1898); O'Banner v. Pendlebury, 107 N.J.L. 245, 247 (E. & A.1931); Gibraltar Factors Corp. v. Slapo, 23 N.J. 459, 463 (1957). [Id. at 264-65; emphasis added.] … Robson v. Rodriguez, 26 N.J. 517, 528 (1958); see also Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholders, supra, 30 N.J. at 394 . In McKenney v.

State v. Board of Excise

59 N.J.L. 97 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896

The act of 1891 provides “that hereafter, in all cities of the second class in this state (whether such licenses are now granted by a board of excise, or by commissioners of excise or by the governing board of such city or … In Decker v. Board of Excise, 28 Vroom 603, Mr. Justice Reed expressed the same view, although that question was not necessarily involved in the case.

Board of Education v. Woodstown-Pilesgrove Regional Education Ass'n

81 N.J. 582 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1980

We granted the Board’s petition for certification. 81 N.J. 44 (1979). Preliminarily, we call attention again to our holding in State v. … Thus, if it is “ a matter of essential managerial prerogative which has been delegated by the Legislative to the Board [of Education],” it “cannot be bargained away.” Bernards Tp. Bd. of Ed. v. Bernards Tp. Ed.

Village of Ridgewood v. State Board of Tax

129 N.J.L. 121 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 28, 1942

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; affirmed, 124 Id. 451. … Lawrence Township v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 124 Id. 465.

Coventry Square, Inc. v. Westwood Zoning Board of Adjustment

138 N.J. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1994

Harvard Enters., Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, 56 N.J. 362, 370 , 266 A.2d 588 (1970) (Hall, J., concurring). … Hardship is a straightforward concept: “the inutility of the property for the permitted uses * * Kramer v. Board of Adjustment, 45 N.J. 268, 286 , 212 A.2d 153 (1965) (citing Yahnel v.