Case law

Beckworth v. New Jersey State Parole Board

62 N.J. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1972

Certification to New Jersey State Parole Board granted.

Harmon v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

10 N.J. Misc. 1297 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 19, 1932

of public utility commissioners and *1300 there is certainly nothing to impugn the integrity of the board in a refusal on such an application as is here presented. … The order of the board of public utility commissioners is affirmed.

Hunter v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

1 N.J. Misc. 408 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 18, 1923

such order, or that the same was without the jurisdiction of the board. … If-the order be set aside the case is remanded to the board for revision of its order, as this court has not the power to revamp the board’s order in conformity with its views.

Kinlin v. State Board of Medical Examiners

2 N.J. Misc. 346 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 7, 1924

of vocational training, shall, upon being graduated from any such institution and furnishing evidence thereof satisfactory to the board of medical examiners, be-entitled to a license under the provisions of this act.” … Relator furnished the respondent, the board of medical examiners, with satisfactory proof of all the matters set forth in the foregoing proviso, but respondent, nevertheless, contends that relator must furnish satisfactory

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Irvine

5 N.J. Misc. 155 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the case of State Board of Medical Examiners of New Jersey v. Sabol, No. 204, of the present October term of the court of 1926.

Benbak Construction Co. v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

Board of Adjustment of the City of East Orange, speaking of the function of the board of adjustment, says: “Such board, when it acts, acts judicially on a lawful ascertainment of facts. Bilt-Wel. Co. v. Dowling, 5 N. J. … R. 96), and there is a further presumption that the action of the board was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801.

Summit Porcelain Co. v. Board of Adjustment

3 N.J. Misc. 728 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 1925

Prosecutor then appealed, pursuant to the terms of such ordinance, to the board of adjustment, and that board refused to issue such permit. … That clause has been definitely defined-by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Ignaciunas v. Risley, 2 N. J. Adv.

Township of Rockaway v. Board of Freeholders

68 N.J.L. 16 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1902

The thirty-second section of the act to incorporate chosen freeholders in the respective counties of this state provides that when the board of freeholders shall have purchased or built a county poorhouse, the poor of the … By virtue of the provisions of a supplement to the Board of Health act, approved March 29th, 1892, the local board of health in any city, borough, town or other local government (and this latter includes townships), when

Board of Commissioners of Nutley v. Ernst

120 N.J.L. 68 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 6, 1938

The statute, so far as pertinent with respect to the organization of the joint meeting, is as follows: “It shall be lawful for the respective governing bodies or boards of the municipalities so contracting having authority … They contend that there is a provision of the act to the effect that in the case of the presence of one member of the municipal body or board the vote of his municipality may be cast by him. 3 Comp.

Cole v. Board of Education of Trenton

122 N.J.L. 585 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1939

The school board fixed defendant’s salary fox the school year 1937-1938 at the sum of $1,700. … The State Board of Education affirmed the order of the commissioner. The writ is to review such order.

Harmon v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

111 N.J.L. 238 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 27, 1933

Johnson v. Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

107 N.J.L. 380 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 2, 1931

Roseberry v. Warren County Board of Taxation

7 N.J. Misc. 985 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1929

He was found guilty of giving instructions to assessors as coming from the board not to assess certain property and to assess some other at but sixty per cent, of its value, when in fact the board had not authorized such … The reasons for reversal do not embody this point, but if it were otherwise the point itself is without merit. • The order of the board is affirmed.

Hann v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

7 N.J. Misc. 1047 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1929

This is on motion for the allowance of a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings of the state board of taxes and assessment against the Morris County Traction Company for the 1928 franchise tax.

Dexter v. Board of Commissioners of Pilotage

70 N.J.L. 429 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1904

return made by the commissioners (among other averments not necessary to be mentioned) admits that the relator had been licensed as a deputy pilot and had served as such for a period of two years; that he applied to the board … Prom this it appears that the discretion of the' board has been fairly exercised to a sufficient extent to develop one insuperable obstacle to the issuance of a license to the relator.

Board of Tenement House Supervision v. Gruber

79 N.J.L. 257 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1910

These difficulties are sufficiently illustrated by *258 the cases of Brophy v. Perth Amboy, 15 Id. 217; Holzworth v. Newark, 21 Id. 85; McEwen v. Board of Health, 32 Id. 468; Harman v. … State Board of Pharmacy, 38 Id. 117; White v. Neptune City, 27 Id. 222; Board of Health v. Cattell, 44 Id. 516; Bourgeois v. Board of Health of Ocean City, 48 Id. 162. But for the decision in Board of Health v.

National Surety Co. v. Board of Education

11 N.J. Misc. 225 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 28, 1933

It was in our opinion such a reference as is illustrated in the cases of American Central Insurance Co. v. Landau, 62 N. J. Eq. 93; 49 Atl. Rep. 738 ; Stout v. Phoenix Assurance Co., 65 N. J. Eq. 566; 56 Atl. Rep. 591 .

Clay v. Civil Service Commission

89 N.J.L. 194 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 27, 1916

Justice Garrison, speaking for the Supreme Court, in the case of Newark v. … If, on the other hand, it be considered a formal adjudication by the board of the right of Dr. Browne to continue in the position of health officer and the usurpation by Dr.

Nazario v. Bergenfield Board of Education

153 N.J. 399 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 24, 1998

Leave to appeal is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division to reconsider in the light of Feinberg v. New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection, 137 N.J. 126 , 644 A.2d 593 (1994).

Van Emburgh v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

87 N.J.L. 637 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1915

1912, a certificate issned by the proper authority, and the plaintiff entered upon the performance of the duties of his office and so continued until March 12th, 1913, when it was determined by the Supremo Court (Pierson v. … The answer to this is, that this court has held otherwise in Lyons v. Freeholders of Morris County, 86 N. J. L. 206.