Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnj

10,000+ results

1.89s

  • State v. Board of Street & Water Commissioners

    55 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1893

    In section 17 of this charter it was provided that the board of aldermen, the board of education, the board of police commissioners and the board of public works shall each annually, during the month of June, present in writing … The board of police commissioners were not subjected to the approving power of the board of aldermen and the board of finance in the respective sections named.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keeler v. Board of Freeholders of Burlington

    79 N.J.L. 436 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1910

    This ease was afterwards in Jernee v. … So in Maguth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Civil Service Commission

    130 N.J.L. 528 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1943

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Esposito v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    8 N.J. Misc. 255 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 28, 1930

    Our examination of the record discloses to our satisfaction that the order of the public utility board revoking the local consent of the prosecutor to operate an auto bus in Hoboken is amply supported by evidence and is legally

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jamouneau v. Board of Commissioners of Newark

    132 N.J.L. 240 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 30, 1944

    Applicant seeks a writ of certiorari to review a resolution adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the City *241 of Newark making an emergency appropriation of $85,388.10 for expenses and disbursements of the law department

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Felter v. Board Zoning Adjust., Glen Rock

    117 N.J.L. 532 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 22, 1937

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pitney v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    130 N.J.L. 76 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 26, 1943

    Central Railroad Company of New Jersey appointed by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, were granted a writ of certiorari by a justice of this court to review a decision and judgment of the State Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Walker

    105 N.J.L. 256 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 15, 1928

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cortese v. Board of Adjustment of Summit

    137 N.J.L. 609 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 3, 1948

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cortese v. Board of Adjustment of Summit

    136 N.J.L. 455 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 29, 1948

    The prosecutors were allowed a writ of certiorari to attack the zoning ordinance of the City of Summit and the denial by the Board of Adjustment of an application for a variance so as to permit the use of prosecutors’ premises … The prosecutors have not established a case of unnecessary hardship and without the presence of that factor, the Board of Adjustment may not grant an application for a variance. Scaduto v. Bloomfield, 127 N. J. L. 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MacPherson v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    127 N.J.L. 599 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 9, 1942

    The taxpayer appealed to the State Board of Tax Appeals which affirmed the Hudson County Board. Thereupon she applied for and a writ of certiorari was allowed with leave to take depositions. … It should be pointed out that the affidavit was filed in response to a letter from the Board of Tax Commissioners of the city, which reads in part: “In order that a fair tax may be levied on this estate, you are notified

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steck v. Board of Education of Camden

    124 N.J.L. 132 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1940

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kinlin v. State Board of Medical Examiners

    101 N.J.L. 221 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1925

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cain v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    77 N.J. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Beckworth v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    62 N.J. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1972

    Certification to New Jersey State Parole Board granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roseberry v. Warren County Board of Taxation

    7 N.J. Misc. 985 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1929

    He was found guilty of giving instructions to assessors as coming from the board not to assess certain property and to assess some other at but sixty per cent, of its value, when in fact the board had not authorized such … The reasons for reversal do not embody this point, but if it were otherwise the point itself is without merit. • The order of the board is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hann v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    7 N.J. Misc. 1047 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 1929

    This is on motion for the allowance of a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings of the state board of taxes and assessment against the Morris County Traction Company for the 1928 franchise tax.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benbak Construction Co. v. Board of Adjustment

    6 N.J. Misc. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

    Board of Adjustment of the City of East Orange, speaking of the function of the board of adjustment, says: “Such board, when it acts, acts judicially on a lawful ascertainment of facts. Bilt-Wel. Co. v. Dowling, 5 N. J. … R. 96), and there is a further presumption that the action of the board was right. Silvester v. Princeton, 5 N. J. Adv. R. 1801.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Summit Porcelain Co. v. Board of Adjustment

    3 N.J. Misc. 728 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 14, 1925

    Prosecutor then appealed, pursuant to the terms of such ordinance, to the board of adjustment, and that board refused to issue such permit. … That clause has been definitely defined-by the Court of Errors and Appeals in Ignaciunas v. Risley, 2 N. J. Adv.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harmon v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    10 N.J. Misc. 1297 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 19, 1932

    of public utility commissioners and *1300 there is certainly nothing to impugn the integrity of the board in a refusal on such an application as is here presented. … The order of the board of public utility commissioners is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.