Case law

Mundy v. Board of Water Commissioners

75 N.J.L. 25 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1907

The board has had conferred upon it by the legislature the power of condemnation to meet just such a situation as this. … Under these circumstances the failure of the board to have recourse to proceedings in condemnation, in view of the ex *26 cessive purchase price demanded, is an unreasonable and improvident exercise by the board of the powers

Kline v. Board of Excise Commissioners

87 N.J.L. 38 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 22, 1915

This was the act relied on by this court in Voight v. Excise Board, 59 N. J. L. 358, as supporting a proceeding that would have been invalid under the Werts act in its original form. … It is recognized as in force by our decision in Henkel v. Hoy, 74 Id. 56, 57, submitted and decided after the supplement of 1906.

State v. Essex Public Road Board

47 N.J.L. 101 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1885

In Carter v. … Traphagen v. West Hoboken, 10 Vroom 232 ; State v. Elizabeth, 12 Vroom 152 ; Kirkpatrick v. Commissioners, 13 Vroom 510 ; Culver v. Jersey City, 16 Vroom 256 .

McManus v. Board of Police Commissioners

73 N.J.L. 307 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 26, 1906

a legal meeting of the board. … The board is constituted of four members. Pamph. L. 1885, p. 326.

Bowlby v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

83 N.J.L. 346 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 23, 1912

Sweeney v. Stevens, 17 Vroom 344 . … Hendrickson v. Fries, 16 Vroom 555 ; Christie v. Bayonne, 19 Id. 407 . A construction which leads to declaring sections of ah act unconstitutional ought not to be adopted if it can be avoided.

Bolger v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

81 N.J. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 10, 1979

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

74 N.J. 266 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 7, 1977

Mullin v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

44 N.J. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 12, 1965

Heaviland v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

64 N.J.L. 176 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1899

under the control of the board as to appointment and term. … Peterson v. Freeholders of Salem, 34 Vroom 57 .

Reimer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

96 N.J.L. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1921

on charges preferred by the board. … That a superior officer who has expressed dissatisfaction with the conduct of an inferior may sit as his judge on the trial of charges against him, there being na statutory prohibition, was held in Crane v.

Reimer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

97 N.J.L. 575 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 28, 1922

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Bugbee

98 N.J.L. 423 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 20, 1923

In 1918 the legislature passed the act entitled “An act concerning charitable, correctional, reformatory and penal institutions, boards and commissioners, located and conducted in this state, which are supported in whole … Corp. v. Stafford, 70 N. J. L. 528. The act of 1918 was a reorganization of that department of the state government dealing with matters of a charitable, penal and correctional nature.

Nygren v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

86 N.J.L. 364 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1914

This ease is controlled by the views expressed in the case of Webster v. Freeholders, at the present term, ante p. 256. For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the present judgment will'be affirmed.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

29 N.J.L. 296 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1861

This is an application for a mandamus to the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Mercer, requiring them to pay to the family of the relator, a private in the cavalry regiment now in the service of the government … The coneonstruction of this part of the act underwent consideration in the case of The- State, John Brown, prosecutor, v. *299 The Mayor and Common Council of the City of Newark, decided at June Term last.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

58 N.J.L. 340 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

The act of April 21st, 1876, respecting county physicians (Rev., p. 817), authorized, in the first section thereof, any board of chosen freeholders of any county of this state, whenever said board should deem it best to do … Haines v. Freeholders of Camden, 18 Vroom 454 ; Simon v. Hoboken, 23 Id. 367; Roberson v. Bayonne, ante p. 325. The writ of certiorari must be dismissed, with costs.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

44 N.J.L. 392 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1882

There exists a dead-lock between the director at large and the members of the board. … Their appointment is controlled entirely by the board.

McGarvey v. Board of Pension Commissioners

119 N.J.L. 390 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1938

Harrington v. Jersey City, *392 78 N. J. L. 610.” Board of Education v. Tait, 81 N. J. Eq. 162. In the present case, prosecutor had been demoted for a violation of the rules and regulations of the department. … Justice Case in Bader v. Crone, 116 N. J.

Onka v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

125 N.J.L. 5 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 27, 1940

Fischer v. Nutley, 120 N. J. L. 290; Hammond v. Monmouth County, 117 Id. 11; Allas v. Rumson, 115 Id. 593.

Plunkett v. Board Pension, C., Hoboken

114 N.J.L. 273 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

Durkin v. Board of Fire Commissioners

90 N.J.L. 670 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1917