Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncwd

1,784 results

0.73s

  • Brown v. SunTrust Bank

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 21, 2020

    See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty., 137 S. Ct. 1773, 1780 (2017); Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 923 (2011). … (citing Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers Nat’l Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 1253, 1260 (E.D. Va. 1988)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Waldrep v. Gaston County Board of Elections

    575 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 20, 1983

    On June 23, 1983, after this case had been pending for six months, the Fourth *760 Circuit Court of Appeals decided Hendon, et al. v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, et al., 710 F.2d 177 (4th Cir. 1983). … Therefore, the court finds that the statutory practice utilized by the Gaston County Board of Elections in the November 1,1982 election, under which straight ticket voters were deemed to have voted for all the candidates

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 28, 2020

    Brown v. United States, 2010 WL 3607893 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 2010). … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jan 21, 2020

    United States v. Brown, 755 F. App’x 251 (4th Cir. 2019). … United States v. Brown, 755 F. App’x 251 (4th Cir. 2019). Petitioner fails to explain what arguments appellate counsel could have made that had a reasonable probability of succeeding on direct appeal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 18, 2019

    BROWN, ) ) Petitioner, ) … Petitioner filed a Motion to Vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 that was stayed pursuant to Beckles v. United States, 15-8544, United States v. Ali, 15-4433, and United States v. Simms, 15-4640. (Doc. No. 5).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ME v. Board of Educ. for Buncombe County

    88 F. Supp. 2d 493 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 17, 1999

    Board of Educ. of Hendrick Hudson Cent. Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 201 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … In essence, district courts must “ ‘make an independent decision based on a preponderance of the evidence, while giving due weight to state administrative proceedings.’ ” Board of Educ. of Montgomery County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoke v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAM. OF STATE OF NC

    395 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975

    Hoke’s position rested primarily on Larkin v. … Hoke has vigorously asserted that his case is identical with, if not stronger than, Larkin v. Withrow, supra, since here the Board can revoke and not simply suspend.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Union, AFL-CIO, Local 28 v. American Bakeries Co.

    305 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 13, 1969

    Brown showed v. a few minutes later, but refused to talk with them. These actions of the defendant provoked a strike, in protest. … Brown J. J. Brown, Plant Manager jww September 18, 1969 cc: R. W. D. S. U.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McKinney v. Board of Trustees of Mayland Community College

    713 F. Supp. 185 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 21, 1989

    McKinney v. Rodney C. … Mason v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of Governors of University of North Carolina

    429 F. Supp. 871 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 1977

    As to the primary effect criterion, it was said in Hunt v. … More specific guidelines are provided in Roemer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • C'est Bon, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Alcoholic Control

    325 F. Supp. 404 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 13, 1971

    After this citation was publicized, the Mecklenburg ABC Board met and on January 27, 1971, issued a statement to beer and “brown bag” licensees, which quite prudently recognized the current (and chronic) uncertainty as to … injunction against any state court proceeding is sought, and since the *406 harm threatened to plaintiff is both great and immediate as well as irreparable, equitable relief pendente lite is in order despite language in Younger v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Capacchione Ex Rel. Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    9 F. Supp. 2d 572 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 20, 1998

    United States v. Smith, 653 F.2d 126, 128 (4th Cir.1981) (citing Powell v. … Armstrong v.

    Vacated by a later decision, 300 F.3d 530 (2002)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. County of Mecklenburg

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 26, 2022

    See Brown v. Burns, No. 3:21-cv-491-MOC, 2021 WL 5815828 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 7, 2021). Plaintiff later retained counsel, and then entered into a tolling agreement with the County on January 10, 2022. (Doc. No. 1 at 19–23). … Brown v. Charlotte Rentals LLC, No. 3:15-cv-0043-FDW-DCK, 2015 WL 4557368, at *2 (W.D.N.C. July 28, 2015) (citing Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Henderson County Sheriff's Office

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2025

    WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:23-cv-00270-MR-WCM MACKENZIE ELAINE BROWN … Kentucky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States ex rel. Wilson v. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District

    976 F. Supp. 2d 755 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 1, 2013

    Minutes of Graham County District Board meetings show that Greene (also an NRCS employee) reported to the Board (1) in July 1995 that Orr was interested in doing the 650 Project work, (2) in September 1995 that Orr and Brown … Public records, such as minutes of Graham County District Board meetings, show that Greene reported to the Board in July 1995 that Orr was interested in doing the 650 Project work, in September 1995 that Orr and Brown would

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • CM Ex Rel. JM v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF HENDERSON CTY.

    85 F. Supp. 2d 574 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 12, 1999

    Board of Educ. of the Hendrick Hudson Central Sch. Dist. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 201 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … In essence, district courts must “ ‘make an independent decision based on a preponderance of the evidence, giving due weight to state administrative proceedings.’ ” Board Educ. of Montgomery County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • AD Ex Rel. SD v. Board of Pub. Educ. of Asheville

    99 F. Supp. 2d 683 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 6, 1999

    This Court agrees completely with the opinion issued by the district court in Minick v. Board of Trustees of Prince George’s Community College, Civil No. … Hanson, 864 F.2d 324 , 328 (4th Cir.1989)) in their brief]; Dale M. by Alice M. v. Board of Educ. of Bradley-Bourbonnais High School, Distr. No. 301, 29 Indiv. with Disabilities Educ.L.Rep. 600, 601 (C.D.Ill.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Henderson County Sheriff's Office

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 14, 2024

    Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001); see also Fawzy v. … .’”); Colin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Bones Jones Brands, LLC

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 6, 2023

    FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:22-cv-00228-MR-WCM GARY BROWN … See Fox v. Fox, 167 F.3d 880, 884 (4th Cir. 1999) (citing City of Milwaukee v. Cement Div., Nat’l Gypsum Co., 515 U.S. 189, 194 (1995)). “In Brooklyn Savings Bank v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Henderson County Sheriff's Office

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 23, 2024

    See Luehring, 2021 WL 4533275, at *1; Olivia v. … (quotations and citations omitted)); Murray v. N.C. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, No. 1:14CV985, 2014 WL 12651234, at *1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2014); Katumbusi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.