Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,435 results
1.87s
NEW V. THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INC.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2020
Copeland v. Bieber, 789 F.3d 484, 490 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting Phillips v. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir. 2008) (quoting Harrison, 176 F.3d at 784).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 27, 2026
Brown, Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, No. CV 9:15-2723-JMC-BM, 2016 WL 165 (1985) (quoting Monell v. Dep’t of 11200707, at *16 (D.S.C. Sept. 14, Soc. … Doe v. Public Citizen, 749 documents are medical records.” See F.3d 246, 266 (4th Cir. 2014). To Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown310 F. Supp. 3d 607 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 18, 2018
United States v. … See United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 29, 2020
going to the grocery store” (id. at 5 (citing Brown v. Commissioner Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251, 263 (4th Cir. 2017), Lewis v. … See Hays v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 9, 2022
Hunter v. Sullivan, 993 F.2d 31, 34 (4th Cir. 1992) (quoting Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971)). … Albright v. Commissioner of the Soc. Sec.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCananwill, Inc. v. EMAR Group, Inc.
250 B.R. 533 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 5, 1999
Co. v. … Board of Supervisors, 103 F.3d 351, 360 (4th Cir.1996).
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2026
See Spell v. … See Trimper v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 19, 2025
Moreover, in Arakas v. … Parikh explained that: I am a board-certified neurologist and epileptologist. Kathy Woodard has been my patient since 7/3/23 at Duke University Department of Neurology.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 2022
July 28, 2022); Allen v. … [The complaint] contains no facts supporting an intentional, as opposed to negligent, action by the[ election board d]efendants . . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownALLEN v. UNC ADAMS SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 2022
July 28, 2022); Allen v. … [The complaint] contains no facts supporting an intentional, as opposed to negligent, action by the[ election board d]efendants . . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownALLEN v. GUILFORD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 2022
July 28, 2022); Allen v. … [The complaint] contains no facts supporting an intentional, as opposed to negligent, action by the[ election board d]efendants . . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 2022
July 28, 2022); Allen v. … [The complaint] contains no facts supporting an intentional, as opposed to negligent, action by the[ election board d]efendants . . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 2025
Edwards v. Murphy-Brown, LLC, 760 F. Supp. 2d 607, 623 (E.D. Va. 2011). … See Coleman v. Md.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTAYLOR v. CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 29, 2024
Brown v. Food for Life Baking Co., Inc., 658 F. Supp. 3d 732, 743 (N.D. Cal. 2023) (quoting Mort v. U.S., 86 F.3d 890, 892 (9th Cir. 1996)). … (quoting Dinosaur Dev., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 2022
July 28, 2022); Allen v. … [The complaint] contains no facts supporting an intentional, as opposed to negligent, action by the[ election board d]efendants . . . .
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 18, 2020
Hancock v. … Hunter v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 15, 2022
Moreover, in Arakas v. Comm’t of Soc. … See Blalock v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHEDRICK v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 16, 2021
Co., v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105, 111 (2008) (quoting and citing Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 111-113 (1989)). … Elliott v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTHE TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY v. WOLFSPEED, INC.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 17, 2023
Separately, Defendant has challenged the patent at issue here (by means of Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) petition) before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”), a tribunal within the United … v. Freeman, No. 09-CV-2573, 2012 WL 2370122, at *2 (D. Md.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2024
Moreover, in Arakas v. … Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 636 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting Cichocki v. Astrue, 729 F.3d 172, 177 (2d Cir. 2013) (per curiam)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna