Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncmd

1,435 results

1.68s

  • SACKS HOLDINGS, INC. v. GRIN NATURAL USA LIMITED

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 9, 2025

    Glaston, 2024 WL 3161621, at *8 (brackets, ellipses, and certain internal quotation marks omitted); see also Brown v. Experian Info. … See, e.g., United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thomas v. Freeway Foods, Inc.

    406 F. Supp. 2d 610 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 22, 2005

    Crinkley, 844 F.2d at 166 (citing Fike v. Board of Trustees, 53 N.C.App. 78 , 279 S.E.2d 910 (1981)). … V.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • The IN PORTERS, SA v. Hanes Printables, Inc.

    663 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 11, 1987

    See also McLain v. … Real Estate Board of New Orleans, 444 U.S. 232 , 100 S.Ct. 502 , 62 L.Ed.2d 441 (1980) (discussed interstate commerce element of Sherman Act in jurisdictional terms, but used 12(b)(6) terms in concluding that dismissal was

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Strickland v. Jewell

    562 F. Supp. 2d 661 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 15, 2007

    Baskerville v. Culligan Int’l Co., 50 F.3d 428, 430 (7th Cir.1995); see also Hartsell v. … He claims that an obscene photo was hung up on the bulletin board, but cannot remember or describe the picture. (PL's Dep. p. 128.) 2 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • ABC, INC. v. PrimeTime 24, Joint Venture

    17 F. Supp. 2d 478 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 19, 1998

    Microstar v. … PrimeTime also cites Board of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys. v. DLG Fin. Corp., 29 F.3d 993 (5th Cir.1994), Director, OTS v. Lopez, 960 F.2d 958 (11th Cir.1992), and S.E.C. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.

    984 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 29, 1997

    Brown v. CSX Transp., Inc., 18 F.3d 245, 248 (4th Cir.1994). … Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • GREENTOUCH USA, INC. v. STARWOOD FURNITURE (MFG) VIETNAM CORPORATION

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 8, 2025

    Dep’t of Corr. v. Schacht, 524 U.S. 381, 388 (1998); Capps v. Newmark S. Region, LLC., 53 F.4th 299, 302 (4th Cir. 2022). … The nerve center must be “the actual center of direction, control, and coordination, and not simply an office where the corporation holds its board meetings.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BOONE v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 3, 2024

    See Swierkiewicz v. … See Brown v. Target Inc., No. 14-CV-0950, 2015 WL 6163609 at *6-7 (D. Md.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Whitlock v. Duke University

    637 F. Supp. 1463 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 16, 1986

    Board of Transportation, 292 N.C. 437 , 233 S.E.2d 569 (1977); Trull v. Carolina-Virginia Well Co., 264 N.C. 687 , 142 S.E.2d 622 (1965). … See Smith v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • MOUNCE v. BERRYHILL

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 7, 2020

    (Id. at 18 (quoting Woods v. … Berryhill, 858 F.3d 858, 868 n.3 (4th Cir. 2017), Brown v. Commissioner Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251, 263 (4th Cir. 2017), Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dealers Supply Co., Inc. v. Cheil Industries, Inc.

    348 F. Supp. 2d 579 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 13, 2004

    Choi and Russell Barringer, chairman of the board of directors of Dealers, stood up and shook hands. No written agreement was ever signed by the parties. … See, e.g., Brooks v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • BROWNLEE v. SAUL

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 16, 2019

    In Mascio v. … Woods v. Berryhill, 888 F.3d 686, 694 (4th Cir. 2018) (citing Brown v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251, 263 (4th Cir. 2017)). Despite Plaintiffs allegations to the contrary (Pl.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • HAMEED

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 11, 2026

    See Camp v. … Alaska Dep’t of Env’t Conservation v. E.P.A., 540 U.S. 461, 497 (2004) (quoting Bowman Transp., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jenkins v. Trustees of Sandhills Community College

    259 F. Supp. 2d 432 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 25, 2003

    In Hughes v. … See Keller v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Rhone-Poulenc Agro, S.A. v. Monsanto Co.

    445 F. Supp. 2d 531 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 7, 2006

    Significantly, the tissue scored at 3, 4, and 5 — each being classified as “resistant” — would be less than all green with a 3 being more brown than green. … V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • DARWICH

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Dec 17, 2025

    The matter is presently pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). … Id. at 426 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2242); see Kanai v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • PHILLIPS v. NAPHCARE, INC.

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 10, 2020

    Brown v. Mitchell, 308 F. Supp. 2d 682, 701 (E.D. Va. 2004). … She relies almost entirely on Quintana v. Santa Fe County Board of Commissioners, No. CIV 18-0043 JB/LF, 2019 WL 452755 (D.N.M.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MANNING v. DVA WELL PATH CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 25, 2021

    Id.; see also Simmons v. … (citing Brown v. Harris, 240 F. 3d 383, 388-89 (4th Cir. 2001)). Plaintiff must demonstrate that Defendant Well Path acted with “‘deliberate indifference’ (subjective) to [his] ‘serious medical needs’ (objective).”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • KELLER v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2024

    Brown, 716 F.3d 342, 350 (4th Cir. 2013), and a court “need not accept as true unwarranted inferences, unreasonable conclusions, or arguments,” Vitol, 708 F.3d at 548 (quoting Jordan v. Alt. Res. … In Perry v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CHISHOLM v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS OF NORTH CAROLINA CORP.

    District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 12, 2023

    Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 636-37 (4th Cir. 2007). … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.