Case law

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Beach Mart, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 29, 2023

Parties are invited to supplement their briefing by September 1, 2023, including with reference to Murphy-Brown, LLC v. ACE Am. Ins. Co., 2023 WL 5016162 (N.C. Super. Bus. Ct. … Aug. 7, 2023) and Radiator Speciality Co. v. Arrowood Indem. Co., 383 N.C. 387, 881 S.E.2d 597 (2022). 9.

Edwards v. Southern Railway Co.

258 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 19, 1966

Edwards headed Atlantic as its President or as the Chairman of the Board and General Manager from 1939 until it was taken over by Southern in 1957. W. J. … In that respect, the conclusions reached by the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina in Gillikin v. Atlantic & E. C. Ry. Co., 255 N.C. 228 , 120 S.E.2d 847 (1961) are controlling.

Torres v. Carter

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 18, 2021

Arnold v. Burger King Corp., 719 F.2d 63, 67 (4th Cir. 1983); see, e.g., McAfee v. … Cress (“Cress”) and paralegal Dena Brown (“Brown”). Lee’s hourly rate is $300 per hour; Cress’s rate is $250 per hour; and Brown’s rate is $150 per hour.

Republican Party of North Carolina v. Hunt

841 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 3, 1994

Republican Party of North Carolina v. Martin, 980 F.2d 943, 958 (1992), reh’g denied sub nom. Republican Party of North Carolina v. … See, e.g., Houston Lawyers’ Ass’n v.

The Northern No. 30

24 F.2d 975 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 14, 1928

On the statement of facts presented in Ralli v. … Justice Brown, in the dissenting opinion, said, at page 421 ( 15 S.

Glover v. State of North Carolina

301 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 2, 1969

In Rowe v. … In Martin v.

Spence v. Spence

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 21, 2021

Zinkand v. Brown, 478 F.3d 634, 637 (4th Cir. 2007); Bogart v. Chapell, 396 F.3d 548, 555 (4th Cir. 2005); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 148 F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998); Hughes v. … P. 60(b); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 500-01 (4th Cir. 201 1) (en banc); Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLC, 599 F.3d 403, 412 n.12 (4th Cir. 2010); Nat’ Credit Union Admin. Bd. v.

Powell v. Super 8 Motels, Inc.

181 F. Supp. 2d 561 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 13, 2000

See Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. … Defendant contends that the rules of notice pleadings should be tightened in a civil rights action and cites Arnold v. Board of Education of Escambia County, 880 F.2d 305, 309 (11th Cir.1989) for this proposition.

Bright v. O'Malley

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 20, 2024

PA Brown’s opinion that Claimant “may” need to elevate her feet likewise lacked explanation and was vague. See Robertson v. Saul, No. 5:18-CV- 454-D, 2019 WL 7585180, at *11 (E.D.N.C. … (R. 43); see Woods v.

Crowder v. N.C. Admin. Office of the Courts

374 F. Supp. 3d 539 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 19, 2019

Arbaugh v. … See , e.g. , Coleman v. Talbot Cty. Det. Ctr. , 242 F. App'x 72 , 73-74 (4th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (unpublished); Brown v. Crowe , 963 F.2d 895 , 899-900 (6th Cir. 1992) ; DePriest v.

Pinckney v. United States

671 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 2, 1987

See Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College, 224 N.C. 11, 16 , 29 S.E.2d 137, 140 (1944). The presence of no particular one of the elements is controlling and all are not required. Id. … While plaintiff was unaware, the contractor replaced the ramp with a single board, narrower that the familiar broad ramp.

Allen v. City of Raleigh

140 F. Supp. 3d 470 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 23, 2015

Co. v. … Jackson v.

dPi Teleconnect, L.L.C. v. Finley

844 F. Supp. 2d 664 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 19, 2012

Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 , 65 S.Ct. 161 , 89 L.Ed. 124 (1944). … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.

Woodford v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

779 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 7, 1991

Casement v. Brown, 148 U.S. 615 , 13 S.Ct. 672 , 37 L.Ed. 582 (1893); Arabian American Oil Co. v. … The case of Magno v.

Richmond Cedar Works v. Kramer Bros. & Co.

267 F. 723 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 10, 1920

Simmons lived within a mile of that place; boarded at Liverman’s.” R. H. Spruill says: “Liverman and his father both worked in the swamp. I knew Sam Simmons. He hoarded at \V. E. … Weeks v. Wilkins, 134 N. C. 516 , 47 S. E. 24 ; Baggett v. Jackson, 160 N. C. 26 , 76 S. E. 86 . The contract was made with Johnson prior to the execution of the deed and within 3 years after the deed to Eiverman.

Blake v. O'Malley

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 20, 2024

V. … Kijakazi, 70 F.4th 207, 215 (4th Cir. 2023) and Brown v. Comm’r of the Soc. Sec. Admin., 873 F.3d 251 (4th Cir. 2017) in the process. Jd.

Justice v. North Carolina Department Health and Human Services Secretary

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 7, 2020

the appointment of counsel should be allowed only in exceptional cases . : et Cook v. Bounds, : 518 F.2d 779, 780 (4th Cir. 1975); Whisenant v. … Yuam, 739 F.2d 160, 163 (4th Cir. 1984), eg abrogated on other grounds by Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of Ia., 490 U.S. 296, 300 n.3 (1989).

Weyerhaeuser Company v. Daniel International Corporation

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 1, 2024

More specifically, one section of the excerpts titled “Article V – The Contract Documents” (which itself appears to be excerpted from a component titled “Contract Agreement”) lists several components of the “Contract Documents … Daniel’s requests for information related to work performed by Brown & Root at the New Bern mill are also relevant under Rule 26(b)(1).

North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association v. Wesco Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 10, 2021

Credit Union v. LTD Fin. … at Lloyd’s, London, England v.

Witham v. Boyle

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 8, 2020

(Mem., DE # 19, at 2); see generally Trent Brown, Raleigh federal building has been sending sewage into waterways for years, report says, Raleigh News & Observer (June 3, 2020 5:43 PM), https://www.newsobserver.com/news … See Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355-57 (1978); Hamilton v. Murray, 648 F. App’x 344, 345 (4th Cir. 2016) (citing McCray v. Maryland, 456 F.2d 1, 5 (4th Cir. 1972)).