Case law

Altitude Academy of Barbering LLC v. Pitt Community College

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 19, 2024

Ass’n of Va. v. … Board (DE 121) 8), but plaintiffs lack standing to vindicate the rights of others. Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975).

Eshelman v. Auerbach

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 19, 2022

Clearinghouse Inc. v. Browning Mfg. Div. of Emerson Elec. Co., 953 F.2d 1004, 1007 (Sth Cir. 1992). … Second, Eshelman seeks discovery of all agendas, minutes, presentations, notes, transcripts, recordings, or other materials relating to any Puma board meeting (or any meeting of any committee of Puma’s board) that

Yarber v. Capital Bank

944 F. Supp. 2d 437 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 18, 2013

Keller, the chairman of Capital Bank’s board of directors, told Yarber that he “had no option but to give up any payments due under his Employment Contract,” and that the board of directors could and would terminate Yarber … Yarber believed *443 that he could not be fired for cause or sued, but was concerned that his reputation would be damaged if the board of directors terminated him, even for false reasons. Id. ¶¶ 61, 64.

Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp.

622 F. Supp. 146 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 31, 1985

Henderson v. … The plaintiffs also argue that Ogg v.

Burns v. Brinkley

933 F. Supp. 528 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 1, 1996

.”); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Meyer v. Nebraska, *532 262 U.S. 390, 399 , 43 S.Ct. 625, 626 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); Smith v. … Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985), quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

McCollum v. Robeson County

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 2021

HENRY LEE MCCOLLUM, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … While what happened in their separate interview rooms may be at the heart of their claims, Gilliam v.

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Beach Mart, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 30, 2022

Ins. v. … v.

United States v. One 1985 Mercedes Benz Automobile

716 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 11, 1989

. §§ 881 (d), 885(a); United States v. One 1977 Lincoln Mark V, 453 F.Supp. 1388 (S.D.N.Y.1978). … Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90 , 101 S.Ct. 411 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); see Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984).

Boden v. U.S. Amada Ltd.

978 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 11, 1997

Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Commu *659 nity College, 848 F.2d 457, 458-59 (4th Cir.1988). Plaintiffs charge named only Amada, not the three individual managerial employees. … Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service, 80 F.3d 954, 959 (4th Cir.1996); Goldberg v. B. Green & Co., 836 F.2d 845, 848 (4th Cir.1988).

Hensley v. Engler

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 15, 2024

A procedural due process claim3 is a non-starter because plaintiff does not allege deprivation of a liberty or property interest by the Board, see The Bd. of Regents of State Colleges v. … King v.

English v. General Electric Co.

683 F. Supp. 1006 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 10, 1988

Instead the focus of a National Labor Relations Board proceeding would solely concern whether the defendant union discriminated against the plaintiff and whether a cease and desist order and back pay were proper. … Contra Brown & Root v. Donovan, 747 F.2d 1029 (5th Cir.1984) (Section 210 is designed to protect only "whistle blowers” who provide information to governmental entities).

360 Virtual Drone Services LLC v. Ritter

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2023

Celotex Corp. v. … Steffel v. Thompson, 415 U.S. 452, 459 (1974); see MedImmune, Inc. v.

Gonzalez v. Wake County Public School Systems

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 12, 2022

The Board is incorrect. In support of its argument, the Board cites a district court’s opinion that relies on Jones v. … Goodman v. Diggs, 986 F.3d 493, 498 (4th Cir. 2021) (citing Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 572 (4th Cir. 2001)).

Turner v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

62 F.R.D. 611 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 23, 1974

Neal v. System Board of Adjustment, 348 F.2d 722 (8th Cir. 1965). However, as will more fully appear hereafter, the defendant has raised substantial doubt in the court’s mind as to the maintainability of a class action. … See Torockio v. Chamberlain Manufacturing Company, 51 F. R.D. 517, 519 (W.D.Pa.1971). And as it does not appear that UTU is beyond the jurisdiction of this court, the motion to dismiss will be overruled.

In re W. W. Mills Co.

162 F. 42 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 27, 1908

In Hackney v. Raymond Bros., 10 Am. Bankr. Rep. 214, 68 Neb. 624 , 94 N. W. 822 , 99 N. … In Farmers’ Bank v. Carr, supra, the court said, upon the authority of McNair v.

North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc. v. Jones

409 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 15, 1976

Because they are not sued individually, see Burt v. Board of Trustees, 521 F.2d 1201 (4th Cir. 1975), any recovery obtained against these officers of the state would have to be paid out of the state treasury. … See Bradley v. School Board, 472 F.2d 318 (4th Cir. 1972), vacated on other grounds, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974).

Davis v. Lewis

376 F. Supp. 3d 629 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 22, 2019

Thomson v. Marsh , 884 F.2d 113 , 114-15 (4th Cir. 1989). Similarly, in Carroll v. … Brown v. McLean , 159 F.3d 898 , 902 (4th Cir. 1998) (citing McDonnell Douglas , 411 U.S. at 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 ; Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Cmty. Coll. , 928 F.2d 118 , 121 (4th Cir. 1991) ).

Empire Trust Co. v. Egypt Ry. Co.

182 F. 100 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 3, 1910

Justice Clark reviewed the authorities, citing Railroad v. Brown, 84 U. S. 445 , 21 L. Ed. 675 ; Thomas’s Case, 101 U. S. 83 , 25 L. Ed. 950 . In Perry v. Railroad, 129 N. C. 333 , 40 S. E. 191 , Mr. … In Williard v. Spartanburg Railroad (C.

Dahlman

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 11, 2025

Plaintiffs attended and spoke at board meetings to raise these issues, but their comments and concerns were omitted from the Board’s meeting minutes. /d. Id. Jj 20-22. … Lovern v. Edwards, 190 F.3d 648, 655 (4th Cir. 1999); see also Davison v.

Wright v. Bailey

228 F. Supp. 560 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 16, 1964

In Griffin v. … See Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963) ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 , 83 S.Ct. 814 , 9 L.Ed.2d 811 (1963); Draper v.