Case law

United States ex rel. Chance v. Tolson

312 F. Supp. 1384 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 2, 1969

Petrie v. United States, 407 F.2d 267 (9th Cir., 1969) (en banc); McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185 , 89 S.Ct. 1657 , 23 L.Ed.2d 194 (Decided May 26, 1969). … S.S.S.Reg. §§ 1625.2, 1625.4, 1625.11; e. g., Petrie v. United States, 407 F.2d 267 (9th Cir., 1969) (en banc); Robertson v. United States, 404 F.2d 1141 (5th Cir., 1968); United States v.

Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.

779 F. Supp. 2d 472 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 10, 2011

Rand, acting for the Board and LEA, refused to reschedule the Board meeting. (Id. ¶¶ 136-37.) … To the contrary, Feldman’s mere presence at the Board meeting was an essential function of his employment as President of LEA. See Tyndall v. Nat Educ.

Harris v. Hall

572 F. Supp. 1054 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 21, 1983

Starns v. Malkerson, 401 U.S. 985 , 91 S.Ct. 1231 , 28 L.Ed.2d 527 (1971), summarily aff’g 326 F.Supp. 234 (Minn.1970) (three-judge court); Sturgis v. … V The Court finds that sections 115C-366 and 115C-366.1(a)(l) and the Cumberland County, North Carolina Board of Education policy regarding custody and tuition are facially constitutional and as applied to Harris and Gunter

Speller v. Crawford

99 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 13, 1951

Among many other cases examined are Smith v. United States, D.C. Cir., 187 F.2d 192 ; Andrews v. Swartz, 156 U.S. 272 , 15 S.Ct. 389 , 39 L.Ed. 422 ; Morton v. Henderson, 5 Cir., 123 F.2d 48 ; Hawk v. … Olsen, 8 Cir., 130 F.2d 910 ; Eury v. Huff, 4 Cir., 141 F.2d 554 ; and U. S. ex rel. Feeley v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 166 F.2d 976 .

Butler v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

140 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 1956

Support for this conclusion is sought in Giles v. Smith, 1949, 80 Ga.App. 540 , 56 S.E.2d 860 and Brown v. Town of Louisburg, 1900, 126 N.C. 701 , 36 S.E. 166 . … Compensation from the covenantee is set off against any recovery from the defendant who elects to litigate instead of settle, Harmon v. Givens, 88 Ga.App. 629 , 77 S.E.2d 223 ; Brown v.

Wall & Ochs, Inc. v. Hicks

469 F. Supp. 873 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 9, 1979

See Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners, 374 U.S. 424 , 83 S.Ct. *882 1759, 10 L.Ed.2d 983 (1963), and Huron Portland Cement Company v. City of Detroit, 362 U.S. 440 , 80 S.Ct. 813 , 4 L.Ed.2d 852 (1960). … See Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957), and Exxon Corporation v. Governor of Maryland, 437 U.S. 117 , 98 S.Ct. 2207, 2213 , 57 L.Ed.2d 91 (1978).

Schmitz

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 13, 2026

. § 1983 for liability against the Wake County Board of Education under Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690-94 (1978). … Melgar v. Greene, 593 F.3d 348, 353 (4th Cir. 2010): see also Pearson v.

John Doe 2 v. Nash County Board of Education and Marquis Johnson, individually and as an Employee of the Nash County Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 25, 2026

See Maryland State Firemen’s Ass’n v. Chaves, 166 F.R.D. 353, 354 (D. … received by the addressee”) (citing Washington v. Cline, 761 S.E.2d 650, 655–56 (N.C. App. 2014); Hamilton v. Johnson, 747 S.E.2d 158, 160–61 (N.C. App. 2013)).

Kinloch v. News & Observer Publishing Co.

314 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 3, 1969

Gattis v. Kilgo, 140 N.C. 106 , 52 S.E. 249 (1905); Herndon v. Melton, 249 N.C. 217 , 105 S.E.2d 531 (1938). … Ramsey v. Cheek, 109 N.C. 270 , 13 S.E. 775 (1891); Ponder v. Cobb, 257 N.C. 281 , 126 S.E.2d 67, 78 (1962).

Brewster v. Berger

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 2, 2019

ORDER BELL, in their official capacities as officers ) or members of the North Carolina State ) Board … Growe v. Emison, 507 U.S. 25, 34 (1993); see Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). Therefore, plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.

Harris v. Marsh

679 F. Supp. 1204 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 28, 1987

.”); Lewis v. Brown & Root, Inc., supra. … See Brown supra; Thornton v.

Crumpler v. Etter

579 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 1, 1983

personnel practice has occurred, he reports his determination to the Board and the agency involved. … See Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 , 99 S.Ct. 2264 , 60 L.Ed.2d 846 (1979).

Lamb v. John Umstead Hospital

19 F. Supp. 2d 498 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 1, 1998

Id. at 446, 105 S.Ct. 3249 . ' In Brown v. … Defendant relies on the decision in Brown v.

Resolute Insurance v. North Carolina

276 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 7, 1967

State v. … The first court would become a sounding board for the subsequent proceeding.

Hastings v. Mann

226 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 5, 1964

The Rock Island Bridge, 6 Wall. 213 , 18 L.Ed. 753 ; The Neil Cochran, 1 Brown’s Adm. 162, Fed.Cas. No. 7,996; The Ottawa, Brown’s Adm. 356, Fed.Cas. No. 10,616. … Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Dahl, 1925, 266 U.S. 449, 457 , 45 S.Ct. 157 , 69 L.Ed. 372 ; Panama R. R. Co. v. Johnson, 1924, 264 U.S. 375, 386 , 44 S.Ct. 391 , 68 L.Ed. 748 ; Hartford Life Ins. Co. v.

Riegel

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 4, 2026

Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir. 1983). … Plaintiff's visit resulted in his being charged with second-degree trespass and banned from school board property.

Moss v. United States

549 F. Supp. 2d 721 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 16, 2007

Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to ‘make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.’ ” Diamond v. … Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 923 (Fed.Cir.1990). In light of plaintiffs disability severance pay of $42,321.60 and the fact that he was not identified as a reservist to the CPEB (Admin.

McCauley v. City of Jacksonville, NC

739 F. Supp. 278 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 2, 1989

Betsey v. … Keiger v. Board of Adjustment, 281 N.C. 715, 719 , 190 S.E.2d 175 (1972).

Thonen v. Jenkins

374 F. Supp. 134 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 11, 1974

Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, 345 F.2d 310 (1965). … Nominal damages were allowed in a teacher dismissal case, Horton v. Orange County Board of Education, 464 F.2d 536 (4th Cir. 1972), and to a high school student dismissed because of his hair, Cordova v.

Guerra v. Scruggs

747 F. Supp. 1160 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 1990

Jones v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina, 704 F.2d 713, 715 (4th Cir.1983). … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 572, 92 S.Ct. at 2707 , quoting, Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 , 43 S.Ct. 625, 626 , 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923).