Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnced

1,493 results

1.27s

  • Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

    154 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 29, 1957

    The Third Division of the Adjustment Board was deadlocked at the initial hearing. A Referee was added to the ten-member Board. … N.L.R.B. v. Clearwater Finishing Co., 4 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 938 . Phillips was in no way engaged in any protected union activity, but was helping a plaintiff press a personal injury claim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • North Carolina Right to Life, Inc. v. Bartlett

    3 F. Supp. 2d 675 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 29, 1998

    Defendants’ Motion to Certify Questions to the Board of Elections North Carolina has no legislative authority for certifying questions of state law to the highest state court for decision. … In Buckley v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Flav-O-Rich, Inc. v. North Carolina Milk Commission

    593 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 27, 1983

    Brown, the Supreme Court held that the federal antitrust laws did not prohibit a state, in the exercise of its sovereign powers, from imposing certain anti-competitive restraints. Community Communications Company v. … Dealers Association v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • A Hand of Hope Pregnancy Resource Ctr. v. City of Raleigh

    332 F. Supp. 3d 983 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 27, 2018

    Andon, LLC v. … See Williams v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haberland ex rel. Dex One Corp. v. Bulkeley

    896 F. Supp. 2d 410 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 2012

    See Citron v. … ] or board of directors!

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Reaves v. Williamson

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 22, 2022

    CARES, ARP, ESSA, CATE, and Brown v. Board of Education Plaintiff’s seventh, ninth, and eleventh causes of action assert claims under CARES, ARP, ESSA,4 and CATE. … Her tenth claim, discussed above, also seeks to vindicate the alleged rights of her students under Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Goldsboro Christian Schools, Inc. v. United States

    436 F. Supp. 1314 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 12, 1977

    Prominent among the examples of this policy are the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1871, and 1964, and Brown v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), and its legal progeny. See, Green v. Connally, supra, pp. 1163, 1164.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re the Complaint of Norfolk Dredging Co.

    279 F. Supp. 2d 674 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 4, 2003

    Jarboe, who has sued Norfolk for $7,000,000 in the related action, Jarboe v. … Corp., 794 F.Supp. 601 (E.D.La.1992); Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 377 F.2d 724 (5th Cir.1967); In re United States Dredging Corp., 264 F.2d 339 (2d Cir.1959).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barrow v. North Carolina

    251 F. Supp. 612 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 22, 1965

    The leading case is Kite v. Commonwealth, supra, 1846 [11 Metc., Mass., 581], and the view expressed- there bearing the great name of Chief Justice Shaw was held to be dictum, and repudiated in Brown v. … “We think the view expressed in Brown v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, is sound law, and certainly ‘the better and more humane view,’ and we adopt it as law in this jurisdiction.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McDougal-Wilson v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

    427 F. Supp. 2d 595 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2006

    Boone v. Goldin, 178 F.3d 253, 256 (4th Cir.1999); see Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456-57 (D.C.Cir.1999). … See Faragher, 524 U.S. at 807 , 118 S.Ct. 2275 ; Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 765 , 118 S.Ct. 2257 , 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998); Brown v. Perry, 184 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.1999).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Eastern Oil Transport, Inc. v. United States

    413 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 1976

    Section 305 does not require that all contested applications involving less than *125 three states be submitted to a Joint Board. Boat Transit, Inc. v. … The assignment of an application to a Joint Board is not jurisdictional. It is a matter of procedure and, therefore, may be waived by the parties. Twin City Freight, Inc. v. United States, supra; Ruan Transport Corp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 17, 2019

    The relevant county boards of elections were not responsive to plaintiff's requests, and thus . plaintiff contacted the NCSBOE. … Evans v. BF. Perkins Co., 166 F.3d 642, 647-50 (4th Cir. 1999).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Minnick v. County of Currituck

    861 F. Supp. 2d 677 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 14, 2012

    Carter v. … Louis v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nieves v. McHugh

    111 F. Supp. 3d 667 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 3, 2015

    Ulmet v. … Coffman v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mays-Ott Co., Inc. v. Town of Nags Head

    751 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 1, 1990

    Transland Properties, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of the Town of Nags Head, 18 N.C.App. 712, 716 , 198 S.E.2d, 1 (1973). … Godfrey v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Union County, 317 N.C. 51, 62 , 344 S.E.2d 272 (1986).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.

    779 F. Supp. 2d 472 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 10, 2011

    Rand, acting for the Board and LEA, refused to reschedule the Board meeting. (Id. ¶¶ 136-37.) … To the contrary, Feldman’s mere presence at the Board meeting was an essential function of his employment as President of LEA. See Tyndall v. Nat Educ.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Alley v. Ryan

    319 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 14, 1970

    The Board must however state the reasons for its denial of the requested classification when the claimant has met the statutory criteria. United States v. Broyles, 423 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir., 1970). … Ross v. McLaughlin, 308 F.Supp. 1019 (E.D.Va.1970).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ward v. Columbus County, NC

    782 F. Supp. 1097 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 17, 1991

    Gingles v. Edmisten, 590 F.Supp. at 364 . 47. … Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. at 50-51 , 106 S.Ct. at 2766-67 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Poovey v. Edmisten

    526 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 20, 1981

    Edwards v. … In Goldwater v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kuang Hung Hu v. Morgan

    405 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 22, 1975

    Crow v. Canty, 207 Mo. 439 , 105 S.W. 1078 (1907); State ex rel. Bosch v. Denny’s Place, 98 Ohio App. 351 , 129 N.E.2d 532 (1954), under civil rights statutes, Everett v. … People v. Lim, 18 Cal.2d 872, 880 , 118 P.2d 472, 476 (1941).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.