Case law

Infernal Technology, LLC v. Ubisoft, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 3, 2021

Patent Trial and Appeal Board has judged both patents to be valid, see Compl. 17-18, and both patents expired on March 12, 2019. See [D.E. 23] 1; [D.E. 27] 8 n.2.' … See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-80 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554-63 (2007); Coleman v. Md.

Shaw v. Hunt

861 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 22, 1994

Reynolds v. … City of Mobile v.

Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. v. Guideone Specialty Insurance

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 2022

Id. at 252; see Beale v. … Co., 351 N.C. at 299, 524 S.E.2d at 563; Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 326 N.C. 387, 392, 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990); Grant v. Emmco Ins. Co., 295 N.C. 39, 42, 243 S.E.2d 894, 897 (1978).

Liris S.A. v. Morris & Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 25, 2022

USA, Inc. v. … Farmers Bank v. Michael T. Brown Distribs., Inc., 5 In all citations in this order, internal quotation marks and citations are omitted, unless otherwise specified. 307 N.C. 342, 347-48 (1983).

Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Company v. AT Denmark Investments, ApS

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 18, 2021

Pennoyer v. … See Briggs v. Am. & Efird Mills, Inc., 251 N.C. 642, 644, 111 S.E.2d 841, 843 (1960); Brown v. Between Dandelions, Inc., 849 S.E.2d 67, 70 (N.C. Ct. App. 2020); N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mizell, 138 N.C.

Suntrust Bank v. DEN-MARK CONSTRUCTION, INC.

63 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 757 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 7, 2009

Bankr.P. 8013; 2 Beaman v. … Bank FSB v. Sky Valley, Inc., 99 B.R. 117, 123 (N.D.Ga.1989). V.

Ramirez v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 9, 2023

V. DISCUSSION A. … See Hancock v.

United States v. North Carolina

914 F. Supp. 1257 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 8, 1996

See Dothard v. … Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474, 494 , 79 S.Ct. 1400, 1411 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1959) (citations omitted); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706-07 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Meyer v.

Lahr v. TCFI Aevezx LLC & TCFI Aevex Holdings LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 30, 2021

Likewise, in Garner v. … Talented accountants are able to adjust financial books in an above-board way to ensure the legality of income smoothing.”

Lee v. Saul

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 26, 2021

V. DISCUSSION A. … In the case of Bird v. v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.

Allen v. City of Dunn

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 27, 2023

See Durham v. Horner, 690 F.3d 183, 188 (4th Cir. 2012) (assuming that malicious prosecution is cognizable under § 1983, and deciding that it requires lack of probable cause);5 Brown v. … .”); Saucier v.

Johnson v. Garland

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 30, 2022

Haynes v. … Carter v.

Brooks v. N.C. Department of Correction

984 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 25, 1997

Carafas v. … In State v.

Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Ferster Electric, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 22, 2024

Co., 351 N.C. at 299, 524 S.E.2d at 563; Brown v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 326 N.C. 387, 392, 390 S.E.2d 150, 153 (1990); Grant v. Emmco Ins. Co., 295 N.C. 39, 42, 243 S.E.2d 894, 897 (1978). … Co. v. N.

Becton, Dickinson and Company v. BioMedomics, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 15, 2021

Aliments Krispy Kernels, Inc. v. Nichols Farms, 851 F.3d 283, 290 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Morgan v. Sanford Brown Inst., 137 A.3d 1168, 1180 (2016)). … Techniques, Inc. v.

Shaw v. State of North Carolina

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 25, 2024

Kenny v. … See Goldstein v.

Slominski v. Globe Life Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 12, 2024

See Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 122 (2014); Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). Thus, the court must have specific personal jurisdiction over Globe and United. … See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-80 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554-63 (2007); Coleman v. Md. Ct. of Appeals, 626 F.3d 187, 190 (4th Cir. 2010), aff'd, 566 U.S. 30 (2012); Giarratano v.

Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. v. Yousician Oy

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 9, 2019

See Sec’y of State for Defence v. … We affirm the Board’s conclusion that the claims in these patents are directed to an abstract idea. The patents claim systems including menus with particular features.

Draughon v. Smith

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 21, 2021

See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-80 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554— 63 (2007); Coleman v. Md. … See Briggs v. Am. & Efird Mills, Inc., 251 N.C. 642, 644, 111 S.E.2d 841, 843 (1960); Brown v. Between Dandelions, Inc., 273 N.C. App. 408, 410, 849 S.E.2d 67, 70 (2020); GE Betz, Inc. v. Conrad, 231 N.C.

Doe v. Varsity Brands, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 20, 2024

Varsity also continues to control a majority of the seats on USASF’s board of directors, including all seats with voting rights. Jd. □ 95. USA Cheer was similarly funded by and is operationally bound up with Varsity. … In Gilbert v. U.S.