Case law

Bryant v. Core Contents Restoration, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 30, 2021

Ubl v. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 2024

v. Mont. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 141 S.Ct. 1017, 1024 (2021); Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137 (2014); Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). … See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677-80 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554-63 (2007); Coleman v. Md.

Bir v. McKesson Corporation

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 13, 2023

Corp. v. … Alston, 321 F.R.D. at 44; see also Barden v. Murphy-Brown, LLC, No. 7:20-CV-85, 2021 WL 965915, at *8 (E.D.N.C.

Insaf Nehme v. El Khoury

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 2019

Co. v. Succession of Roy, 777 F.2d 992, 999 (5th Cir.1985); Security Farms v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 124 F.3d 999 (9th Cir.1997); see, e.g, ACC Retail Prop. Dev. & Acquisition Fund, LLC v. … M.D.N.C. 1995) (“Dischargeability is uniquely a bankruptcy question and questions regarding the dischargeability of debts are questions of federal bankruptcy law.”); see also Brown v.

United States v. $115,413.00 In US Currency

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 3, 2024

On June 3, 2020, Lyon entered security at Raleigh-Durham International Airport (“RDU”) in Morrisville, North Carolina, to board a flight to Los Angeles. See [D.E. 1-1] 4 9.' … P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v); see Rabb v. Amatex Corp., 769 F.2d 996, 999-1000 (4th Cir. 1985).

Winyah Rivers Alliance v. Active Energy Renewable Power, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 10, 2022

Shall Issue, Inc. v. … Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 318-19 (4th Cir. 2006) (quoting Rescue Army v. Mun. Ct. - of L.A., 331 U.S. 549, 584 (1947)); see Scoggins v.

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Weaver Cooke Constr., LLC

383 F. Supp. 3d 566 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 11, 2019

Co. v. Nautilus Ins. Co. , 154 F.Supp.3d 259 (M.D.N.C. 2016). … In Nautilus , a general contractor procured a contract with the Guilford County Board of Education, and then sub-contracted part of the job to Associated Steel. 154 F.Supp.3d at 262 .

McDaniel v. Green Dot Corporation

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 9, 2024

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotation omitted); see Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554-63 (2007); Coleman v. Md. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 (1979), superseded on other grounds by statute, Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-598, 92 Stat. 2682 (1978); see Pueschel, 369 F.3d at 354.

Burch v. NC Department of Public Safety

158 F. Supp. 3d 449 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 19, 2016

Hudson v. … There, the Court found- significant that “[t]here was no indication ... that the zoning board was exercising discretionary authority based on subjective, individualized determinations — at least not with regard to easement

Hamilton v. French/West/Vaughan, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 12, 2025

Nemet Chevrolet, Ltd. v. … USA, Inc. v. Link, 372 N.C. 260, 267 (2019).

Hancock v. Americo Fin. Life & Annuity Ins. Co.

378 F. Supp. 3d 413 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 29, 2019

advantages promised thereby," (2) "False Information and Advertising Generally," (3) "Defamation," (4) "Boycott, Coercion and Intimidation," (5) "False Financial Statements," (6) "Stock Operations and Insurance Company Advisory Board … Gray v. N. Carolina Ins.

Sheila Lee v. Officer Molly O’Hara, in her individual capacity, Officer Richard J. Rodriguez, in his individual capacity, Officer Don Bell, in his individual capacity, and Krista Zentner, in her individual capacity

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 16, 2026

Whe “a standard procedure such as handcuffing ‘would rarely constitute excessive force where the officers were justified, as here, in effecting the underlying arrest[,]” Brown v. … Armstrong v. Vill.

Deaver v. Woodbury Wellness Center

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 5, 2021

O’Shea v. Commercial Credit Corp., 930 F.2d 358, 362 (4th Cir. 1991); cf. Oubre v. … Browning- Ferris Indus., Inc., 281 F.3d 272, 276 (1st Cir. 2002) (“In determining the validity of a release, this court has adopted a ‘totality of the circumstances’ approach.”); Cassiday v.

DirecTV, Inc. v. Tolson

498 F. Supp. 2d 784 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 20, 2007

In Matthews v. … See Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 317 (4th Cir.2006). Plaintiffs allege the 2006 amendments, if enforced, will illegally subsidize cable operators’ cost of doing business.

Gardner v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 6, 2021

Monroe v. Colvin, 826 F.3d 176, 179 (4th Cir. 2016) (quoting Mascio, 780 F.3d at 636); see also Clifford v. … See Shively v.

Tom v. Hospitality Ventures LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 3, 2022

Jd.; Artis v.M urphy-Brown LLC, No. 7:14-CV-237-BR, 2018 WL 3352639 at *4 (E.D.N.C. … Dilmar Oil Co. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co., 986 F. Supp. 959, 980 (D.S.C. 1997), aff'd, 129 F.3d 116 (4th Cir. 1997); see also Cook v. Howard, 484 F.

Progress Solar Solutions, LLC v. Fire Protection, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 1, 2019

In Badame v. … App. at 30, 568 S.E.2d at 898; Gibson v. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 121 N.C. App. 284, 289, 465 S.E.2d 56, 60 (1996); Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 255, 260-61, 393 S.E.2d 134, 137 (1990); Spirax Sarco, Inc. v.

Nadendla v. WakeMed

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 29, 2020

(“plaintiff”) is a physician who is board certified in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and duly licensed to practice medicine in the State of North Carolina. (Compl. DE #6, ¶3.) … Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 349 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Iodice v. United States, 289 F.3d 270, 281 (4th Cir. 2002)).

Gemini Insurance Company v. Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 14, 2020

that EBCI, Harrah’s NC, and CEC are each interested and necessary parties, that the personal jurisdiction argument is premature, that the removal’s procedural deficiencies merit remand, that the “First Affidavit of Terry Brown … See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 94 (1998); Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996); Jones v. Am.

Allen v. Allen

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2025

Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 283 (1986). … Brown & Root, Inc. v. Breckenridge, 211 F.3d 194, 198 (4th Cir. 2000).