Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnced

1,493 results

0.62s

  • Justice v. Nelson

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 25, 2023

    Pension Fund v. … Liteky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rader v. United States

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 16, 2021

    Ripley v. … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 826-27 (1976) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rich v. Premier Electrical Staffing LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 2024

    See, e.g., craigslist, Inc. v. Hubert, 278 F.R.D. 510, 516 (N.D. … Est. of Calzada v. Brake, 439 F.3d 198, 204-05 (4th Cir. 2006). As a general matter, there is a strong preference that defaults be avoided and that matters are disposed of on the merits. Colleton Prep. Acad., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cape Hatteras Access Preservation Alliance v. S.M.R. Jewell

    28 F. Supp. 3d 537 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 20, 2014

    League v. … Wildlands v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • North Carolina Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Leake

    939 F. Supp. 2d 526 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 29, 2013

    Penny, and John Hemphill, who are members of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, all sued in their official capacities (collectively “defendants”). … In Webb v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • North Carolina Ex Rel. Long v. Blackburn

    492 F. Supp. 2d 525 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 25, 2007

    Co. v. Hickman, 183 U.S. 53, 59 , 22 S.Ct. 18 , 46 L.Ed. 78 (1901). 4 In Hickman , a state-created board of commissioners sought to enforce rates for use of a bridge against rail companies. … Corp. v. Comty.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hildreth v. Kijakazi

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 17, 2023

    The ALJ made an alternative finding that, if reduced to the sedentary level, plaintiff could perform jobs such as printed circuit board screener, document preparer, and lens inserter. … Woods v. Berryhill, 888 F.3d 686, 694 (4th Cir. 2018) (quoting Mascio v. Colvin, 780 F.3d 632, 636 (4th Cir. 2015)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Haywood v. Barnes

    109 F.R.D. 568 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 13, 1986

    Defendants contend that: (1) significant issues of liability would differ widely among potential class members and, therefore, individual not class issues predominate; (2) plaintiffs are seeking across-the-board damages for … (b) “Fluid-Recovery” Concept Defendants argue that what plaintiffs essentially seek is an across-the-board award of damages to the class as a whole without proof of individual damages, i.e., a “fluid recovery.”

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Everett v. Accordius Health at Creekside Care, LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 6, 2023

    Brown v. Fam. Dollar Stores of N. Carolina, Inc., No. 1:21-CV-977, 2022 WL 3576972, at *2 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2022) (quoting Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC v. County of Cabarrus, 748 S.E.2d 171, 176 (N.C. Ct. … Servs., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Horton v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

    855 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 6, 1994

    See Armstrong v. Board of School Directors, 616 F.2d 305, 312 (7th Cir.1980); In Re Mid-Atlantic Toyota Antitrust Litigation, 564 F.Supp. 1379, 1384 (D.Md.1983). … Cox v. Collins, 7 F.3d 394, 395-96 (4th Cir.1993).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Saul

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 24, 2019

    In Bird v. … An individual’s RFC is the capacity he possesses despite the limitations caused by physical or mental impairments. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545(a)(1); see also S.S.R. 96-8p, 1996 WL 374184, at *1 (July 2, 1996); see Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baugh v. Woodard

    604 F. Supp. 1529 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 26, 1985

    However, it is difficult, if not impossible, to believe that a-parole board would not more closely scrutinize the behavior of an individual who had been committed to a prison mental health facility. … Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 , 96 S.Ct. 2532 , 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976); Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236 , 96 S.Ct. 2543 , 49 L.Ed.2d 466 (1976).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cortes v. McDonald's Corp.

    955 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 8, 1996

    In Pardasani v. … See Wagoner v. Elkin City Schools’ Board of Education, 113 N.C.App. 579 , 440 S.E.2d 119 (1994).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Boyd v. Municipality Robersonville

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 4, 2024

    Defendant relies upon an affidavit of Tina Brown, mayor of Robersonville, as to the manner in which the summons and complaint was received. … Owens, 767 F.3d at 403; see Wellington v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Liebhold

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 12, 2026

    Miller v. Brown, 462 F.3d 312, 316 (4th Cir. 2006). … Hutton v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., Inc.

    632 F. Supp. 2d 525 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 12, 2008

    Thomas II, an independent Certified Disability Evaluator and board-certified physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist. Id. at 300-13 . Dr. … Lee Becker, an independent physician consultant and board-certified psychiatry specialist. Id. at 314-16, 318 . Dr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Duvall v. United States

    312 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 9, 1970

    In Parrott v. … Adams v. State Board of Education, 248 N.C. 506, 512 , 103 S.E.2d 854, 858 ; accord, Wilson v. Bright, 255 N.C. 329 , 121 S.E.2d 601 ; Hutchens v. Southard, 254 N.C. 428 , 119 S.E.2d 205 .”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nallapati v. Justh Holdings LLC

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 9, 2023

    Sept. 30, 2021) (unpublished), where the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board applied the reckless disregard standard. See [D.E. 189] 7. … Thus, the court declines to adopt the reckless disregard standard that the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board applied in Chutter.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Ballard

    704 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 19, 1987

    Following the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in United States v. … See n. 26, p. 496, where Grannum v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lovedahl v. North Carolina

    242 F. Supp. 938 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 30, 1965

    Dorothy Shular v. … State v. Scales, 242 N.C. 400 , 87 S.E.2d 916 (1955); State v. Willis, 255 N.C. 473 , 121 S.E.2d 854 (1961); and State v. Johnson, 256 N.C. 449 , 124 S.E.2d 126 (1962).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.