Case law

Evans v. O'Malley

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 7, 2024

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971). … Brown v. Comm ’r of Soc. Sec., 873 F.3d 251, 271 (4th Cir. 2017).

Matthews v. Guest Services, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 29, 2025

Ferebee”), Tracy Bowser (“Bowser”), Dennis Hunter (“Hunter”), Chris Chappell (“Chappell”), Jamie Godfrey (“Godfrey”), Matthew Bateman (“Bateman”), John Parrish (“Parrish”), Gerri White, Timothy Warden (“Warden”), Gregory Brown … (“Brown”), Marcus White, David Perry (“Perry”), Gary Spellman, Edward Jordan (“Jordan”), Tama Spellman, Jamie Sutton (“Sutton”), Willis Danchise (“Danchise”), Roy Felton (“Felton”), Ronald Clark (“Clark”), Thomas

Old Republic Insurance Company v. C&G Express Trucking, LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 28, 2020

(citing Abbott Labs v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 148-49 (1967)). … Co. v. Jacobs, No. 1:11-cv-00332- MR-DLH, 2013 WL 2632602, at *2 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2013); FCCI Ins. Co. v. Island Pointe, LLC, 309 F.

Dickerson v. CRC Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 16, 2025

CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 573 U.S. 1, 7 (2014). … Hyer v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 790 F.2d 30, 34 (4th Cir. 1986); see also Silver v.

John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. Portsmouth Fisheries Co.

260 F. 1008 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 24, 1919

Piner says: That he went on board the dredge just before night to put the light on her. "We were still towing then. … Sturm v. Boker, 150 U. S. 312 (330), 14 Sup. Ct. 99, 105 ( 37 L. Ed. 1093 ).

Yellowbrix, Inc. v. Yellowbrick Solutions, Inc.

181 F. Supp. 2d 575 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 10, 2001

Plaintiffs filing its application in the USPTO, and the report did not identify Plaintiffs pending trademark application^ Defendant was unaware of any commercial presence by Plaintiff in February of 2000, the time at which its board … Ltd. v. Sherwood Foods, Inc., 917 F.2d 161 , 165 (4th Cir.1990).

Devarapally v. Ferncreek Cardiology, P.A.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 20, 2025

Doe v. … Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 147 (1999); Daubert v.

Ovis Matamoros Canales v. OPW Fueling Components LLC

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 13, 2026

See United States v. … McKiver v. Murphy-Brown LLC, No. 7:14-CV-180-BR, 2018 WL 10322918, at *1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2018). The request to transfer venue is denied.

Nallapaty v. Nallapati

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 12, 2022

Schaaf v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., 233 F.R.D. 451, 453 (E.D.N.C. 2005) (citing United States v. Star Scientific, Inc., 205 F. Supp. 2d 482, 484 (D. Md. 2002)); Eshelman v. … See Artis v. Murphy- Brown LLC, No. 7:14-CV-237-BR, 2018 WL 3352639, at *2 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2018) (citing EEOC v. Bojangles Restaurants, Inc., No. 5:16-CV-654, 2017 WL 2889493, at *4 (E.D.N.C.

McLaurin v. EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS, INC.

666 F. Supp. 2d 590 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 27, 2009

American Safety Utility Corp., 124 N.C.App. 59, 68 , 476 S.E.2d 672, 678 (1996)(quoting Crews v. W.A. Brown & Son, 106 N.C.App. 324, 331 , 416 S.E.2d 924, 929 (1992)). … Jones v.

Phillips v. WakeMed

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 19, 2021

In Swaso v. Onslow County Board of Education, the Fourth Circuit dismissed a similar claim because plaintiffs “bare allegations [were] insufficient to raise her right to relief above the speculative level.” … Brown, 361 F. Supp. 3d at 562. For protected oppositional activity, Ms.

Claudio v. United States

836 F. Supp. 1219 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 2, 1993

See Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461-62 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290-91 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980). The second type of forum is public property which has been “opened for use by the public as a place for expressive activity.” … United States v.

Robbins v. Altopa, Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 13, 2023

v. Reynolds, 559 U.S. 633 (2010). … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir. 2008). A.

Pruden v. United States

399 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jun 12, 1974

In this regard, see Perez v. … Relying on United States v. Eleazer, 177 F.2d 914 (4th Cir. 1949); James v. United States, 467 F.2d 832 (4th Cir. 1972), and Strohkorb v.

Wright v. North Carolina State University

169 F. Supp. 2d 485 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 6, 2000

Board of Selectmen of Town of Randolph, 932 F.2d 89, 92 (1st Cir.1991) (quoting Santiago-Negron v. Castro-Davila, 865 F.2d 431, 445 (1st Cir.1989)). … See Gile v.

Flenner

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 28, 2026

United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 622 (4th Cir. 2007). … Smith v. Hefner, 235 N.C. 1, 6, 68 S.E.2d 783, 787 (1952) (citing Kirby v. Board of Education, 230 N.C. 619, 55 S.E. 2d 322).

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Massengill (In Re Massengill)

100 B.R. 276 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 26, 1988

In Watt v. Alaska, the United States Supreme Court stated: ... “ 'repeals by implication are not favored,’ ” Morton v. Mancari, 417 U.S. [535] at 549, [ 94 S.Ct. 2474 at 2482 , 41 L.Ed.2d 290 (1974) ] quoting Posadas v. … However, this may be, we need not substitute our judgment for that of the Board of Directors [of the bank] as to retirement of stock, since we do not order retirement.

Federal Insurance v. Sanfatex, Inc.

897 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 14, 1995

Silvers v. Horace Mann Insurance Co., 90 N.C.App. 1, 8 , 367 S.E.2d 372, 376 (1988), aff'd as modified, 324 N.C. 289 , 378 S.E.2d 21 (1989). … Durham City Board of Education v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, 109 N.C.App. 152, 156 , 426 S.E.2d 451, 453 (1993) (citing Maddox v.

Med-Trans Corp. v. Benton

581 F. Supp. 2d 721 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 2008

Co. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 308 F.2d 49 , 50 (9th Cir.1962) (“[I]t is immaterial that the service offered will be attractive only to a limited group”) (internal quotation omitted); see also United States v. … The mere fact that plaintiff does not collect tickets at the boarding gate does not mean that it is not a common carrier as required by the federal statute.

United States v. Nunez-Betancourt

766 F. Supp. 2d 651 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 4, 2011

See U.S. v. … U.S. v. Leshuk, 65 F.3d 1105, 1109 (4th Cir. 1995).