Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

2.46s

  • Privette v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    96 N.C. App. 124 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1989

    Presnell v. … See Pittman v. Wilson County, 839 F.2d 225, 229-30 (4th Cir. 1988). The necessity of a hearing before discharge arises only if plaintiff has a property interest in continued employment. Board of Regents v.

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • North Carolina State Bar v. Harris

    137 N.C. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 4, 2000

    See Willis v. … See State v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Cruz

    173 N.C. App. 689 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2005

    Defendant was interviewed on 2 January 2003 by an investigator with the Pitt County ABC Board of Inquiry, Calvin Craft (Investigator Craft). … In State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Mitchell

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 3, 2025

    In State v. Earwood, 155 N.C. … Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 (1984) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Al-Nasra v. Cleveland County

    202 N.C. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 2010

    On 2 November 2005, the Cleveland County Board of Commissioners approved an ordinance authorizing the code enforcement officer to demolish the Kellum Drive properties. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Orsbon & Fenninger

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2021

    V. … V. ORSBON & FENNINGER, LLP 2021-NCCOA-315 Opinion of the Court Shearin v. Brown, 2021-NCCOA-4, ¶ 11 (quoting Samost v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leary v. Anderson

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 19, 2021

    LEARY V. … LEARY V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Appalachian Poster Advertising Co., Inc. v. Harrington

    120 N.C. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1995

    State v. Spencer, 276 N.C. 535, 547 , 173 S.E.2d 765, 773 (1970). … which caused it to be other than substantially the same as it was on the date the permit was issued, and that decision was in accordance with the Outdoor Advertising Control Act and rules and regulations promulgated by the Board

    Reversed by Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. Harrington, 343 N.C. 303 (1996)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Town of Apex v. Rubin

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 4, 2021

    See, e.g., Brown v. … Meares v. Town of Beaufort, 193 N.C. App. 49, 667 S.E.2d 224 (2008); Mears v. Board of Education, 214 N.C. 89, 91, 197 S.E.2d 752, 753 (1938). 8. The Court has the inherent authority to enforce its own orders.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sara Lee Corp. v. Carter

    129 N.C. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1998

    State v. … See Board of Education v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Sara Lee Corp. v. Carter, 351 N.C. 27 (1999)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • State v. Beasley

    191 N.C. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2008

    State v. Grant, 57 N.C. App. 589, 591 , 291 S.E.2d 913, 915 (1982). In State v. … ."); State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Huerta

    221 N.C. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 2012

    In State v. Horton, 75 N.C. … Lynch, 327 N.C. 210, 215 , 393 S.E.2d 811, 814 (1990), and quoting State v. Brown, 310 N.C. .563, 566, 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984), and State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ray v. TitleMax of Va., Inc.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2026

    Brown, Faucher, Peraldo & Benson, PLLC, by Drew Brown, for the Plaintiffs- Appellees. Morningstar Law Group, by Kenzie M. Rakes1 and Shannon R. Joseph; and Venable LLP, by Abram I. Moore, Daniel J. … In a nearly identical case, Leake v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Quiterio-Morrison

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 2025

    State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566, 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984) (citation omitted). … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Flores Roca

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2025

    State v. Gore, 272 N.C. App. 98, 104 (2020) (citing State v. Garner, 331 N.C. 491 (1992)). … That in conducting the balancing test under Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979) and State v. Veazy, 191 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Ray

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2014

    The charges arose from a 4 April 2012 search of a boarding house -2- where Defendant leased a room. … See State v. Williams, 154 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Wilkerson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

    151 N.C. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2002

    See also Smithwick v. Crutchfield, 87 N.C. … control over all public streets, sidewalks, alleys, bridges, and other ways of public passage within its corporate limits except to the extent that authority and control over certain streets and bridges is vested in the Board

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Waters v. Peaks

    242 N.C. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2015

    See Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427 , 428, 378 S.E.2d 778 , 779 (1989) ("If the granting of summary judgment can be sustained on any grounds, it should be affirmed on appeal."). … See North Carolina Council of Churches v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Munoz v. Munoz

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2021

    ¶5 On 16 April 2018, Father filed a complaint in Cumberland County District Court seeking divorce from bed and board, child custody, child support, and equitable distribution. … MUNOZ V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Summers v. City of Charlotte

    149 N.C. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2002

    Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Bd. of Adjust., 146 N.C. … Thus, it is not necessary for this Court to review appeals from a superior court’s order entered after evaluating a board decision by employing the two-fold standard of review most recently used in Howard v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.