Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

0.98s

  • In re A.B.D.

    173 N.C. App. 77 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 2005

    V. … Williams v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Okafor v. Okafor

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2014

    See Davis v. … Nat’l Bank v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Scadden v. Holt

    222 N.C. App. 799 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2012

    Hedrick v. Rains, 121 N.C. … Smith v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kuder v. Schroeder

    110 N.C. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1993

    Brown & Robbins by G. Les Burke and Carol M. White, Pinehurst, for defendant-appellee. WELLS, Judge. … Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Artis

    174 N.C. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2005

    V. … State v. Small, 301 N.C. 407 , 272 S.E.2d 128 (1980). State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 174 , 293 S.E.2d 569, 584 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L. Ed. 2d 642 (1982).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Gilley

    135 N.C. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1999

    V. … In State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Whitaker v. Hall

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 2026

    WHITAKER V. … On 29 September 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant, seeking, inter alia, divorce from bed and board, custody of their children, and child support.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tagne v. The Univ. of N.C. at Chapel Hill

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2025

    On 30 May 2024, Plaintiff amended his complaint, omitting the Board of Governors and adding “The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill” as Defendant. … Poor v. Hill, 138 N.C. App. 19, 26, 530 S.E.2d 838, 843 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cameron v. Merisel, Inc.

    163 N.C. App. 224 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 2004

    Brown v. Motor Inns, 47 N.C. App. 115, 118 , 266 S.E.2d 848, 849 , disc. review *228 denied, 301 N.C. 86 , 273 S.E.2d 300 (1980). … Our Court held in Phillips v. Stowe Mills, Inc., 5 N.C.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Hollifield

    817 S.E.2d 921 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2018

    State v. Brown , 80 N.C. App. 307 , 311, 342 S.E.2d 42 , 44 (1986) (citation omitted). "Assignments of error challenging the trial court's decisions regarding jury instructions are reviewed de novo [ ] by this Court." … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kirkman v. Wilson

    98 N.C. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 1990

    Midrex Corp. v. Lynch, Sec. of Revenue, 50 N.C. App. 611 , 274 S.E. 2d 853 , disc. rev. denied and appeal dismissed, 303 N.C. 181 , 280 S.E. 2d 453 (1981), citing Wilcox v. … Highway Comm., 279 N.C. 185 , 181 S.E. 2d 435 (1971); Boehm v. Board of Podiatry Examiners, 41 N.C. App. 567 , 255 S.E. 2d 328 , cert. denied, 298 N.C. 294 , 259 S.E. 2d 298 (1979); see also State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • SECRETARY OF REV. v. Carolina Tel. & Tel. Co.

    81 N.C. App. 240 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1986

    State v. Lee, 277 N.C. 242, 244 , 176 S.E.2d 772, 774 (1970) (quoting State v. Fenner, 263 N.C. 694 , 140 S.E.2d 349 (1965). … For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court's order affirming the Tax Review Board. Affirmed. ARNOLD and PARKER, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re QV

    596 S.E.2d 867 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 15, 2004

    Archer v. Rockingham County, 144 N.C.App. 550, 553 , 548 S.E.2d 788, 790 (2001), disc. review denied, 355 N.C. 210 , 559 S.E.2d 796 (2002). … Harris v. Board of Commissioners, 274 N.C. 343, 346-47 , 163 S.E.2d 387, 390 (1968) (internal quotations and citations omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jarvis v. Powers

    80 N.C. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1986

    For example, in Speight v. … See, e.g., Dotson; Watkins v. Smith, 40 N.C. App. 506 , 253 S.E. 2d 354 (1979); Walton; see also Raynor v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • RD&J Properties v. Lauralea-Dilton Enterprises, LLC

    165 N.C. App. 737 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2004

    v. … C. v. Pollard, 101 N.C.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Judd v. Tilghman Med. Assocs.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2020

    Brown v. Lifford, 136 N.C. App. 379, 382, 524 S.E.2d 587, 589 (2000) (citation omitted). … In Swan Beach Corolla, L.L.C. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. L.G. DeWitt Trucking Co.

    82 N.C. App. 208 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1986

    Jackson should see a board-certified internist, Dr. James Stackhouse, to determine whether an underlying disease caused the occlusion. Dr. Stackhouse found no condition in Mr. … See Wyatt v. Sharp, 239 N.C. 655 , 80 S.E. 2d 762 (1954) (pre-existing heart condition); see also Weaver v. Swedish Imports Maintenance, Inc., 61 N.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. DEBERRY

    202 N.C. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 2010

    State v. Cowan, __ N.C. App. __, __, 669 S.E.2d 811, 815 (2008) (quoting State v. Estes, 186 N.C. … State v. Givens, 95 N.C. App. 72, 77-78 , 381 S.E.2d 869, 872 (1989) (citing Brown, 310 N.C. at 569-70, 313 S.E.2d at 589 and State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 13 187 S.E.2d 706, 714 (1972)); see also State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. Howard

    88 N.C. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1987

    Appellants’ reliance on this court’s opinions in Madden v. Chase, 84 *214 N.C. App. 289, 352 S.E. 2d 456 , disc. rev. denied, 320 N.C. 169 , 358 S.E. 2d 53 (1987) and Kiddie Komer v. Board of Education, 55 N.C. … He argues, citing McNeill v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Warren v. Guttanit, Inc.

    69 N.C. App. 103 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1984

    In Performance Motors, Inc. v. … For, as was pointed out in Performance Motors, Inc. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.