Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.26s

  • East Market Street Square, Inc. v. Tycorp Pizza IV, Inc.

    175 N.C. App. 628 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2006

    Shear v. Stevens Building Co., 107 N.C. App. 154, 160 , 418 S.E.2d 841, 845 (1992). … Glenn v. Wagner, 313 N.C. 450, 454 , 329 S.E.2d 326, 330 (1985).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Carillon Assisted Living, LLC v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services

    175 N.C. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 3, 2006

    In making their determination, the board of commissioners shall give consideration to meeting the needs of Special Assistance clients. … Leandro v. State of North Carolina, 346 N.C. 336, 345 , 488 S.E.2d 249, 253 (1997) (citing Mitchell v. N.C. Indus. Dev. Fin.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brevard v. Brevard

    74 N.C. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1985

    In general, Social Security benefits are neither assignable nor subject to legal process. 42 U.S.C. 407; Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board, 409 U.S. 413 , 93 S.Ct. 590 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 608 (1973). … Hennagin v. County of Yolo, 481 F. Supp. 923, 924 (E.D. Cal. 1979).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In re: Bartko

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2024

    Kemp v. Spivey, 166 N.C. App. 456, 461, 602 S.E.2d 686, 690 (2004) (citation and quotation marks omitted). … Bar v. Rogers, 164 N.C. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Choate v. Sara Lee Products

    133 N.C. App. 14 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1999

    There is nothing to indicate that this brief visit to the boarding-house was at all out of the ordinary, or was inconsistent with his duty to his employer. … Co. v. Zachary, 232 U.S. 248, 260 , 58 L. Ed. 591, 596 (1914) (emphasis added)). In Guest v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. McIlwaine

    169 N.C. App. 397 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2005

    See State v. Briggs, 137 N.C. … See State v. Brown, 146 N.C. App. 299, 302 , 552 S.E.2d 234, 236 , (2001) (holding “the Habitual Felons Act used in conjunction with structured sentencing [does] not violate . . . double jeopardy protections).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Helms v. Holland

    124 N.C. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1996

    Clark v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 255, 260 , 393 S.E.2d 134, 136-37 , temp. stay allowed, 394 S.E.2d 167 , disc. review denied and stay dissolved, 327 N.C. 426 , 395 S.E.2d 675 (1990). … In Powell v. Wold, 88 N.C.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • State v. Reel

    202 N.C. App. 374 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2010

    State v. Watkins , 337 N.C. 437, 441 , 446 S.E.2d 67, 70 (1994) (quoting Brown v. Texas , 443 U.S. 47, 51 , 61 L. Ed. 2d 357, 362 , 99 S. Ct. 2637, 2641 (1979)). … Accord State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Bryant

    80 N.C. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1986

    Defendant argues that under State v. … In State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gray v. Crotts

    58 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 1982

    Seawell v. Seawell, 233 N.C. 735, 738 , 65 S.E. 2d 369 (1951), Brown v. Boger, 263 N.C. 248, 256 , 139 S.E. 2d 577, 582 (1965). See also Hyman v. Edwards, 217 N.C. 342, 344 , 7 S.E. 2d 700, 702 (1940), and Barber v. … Properties, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Benton v. Mintz

    97 N.C. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1990

    See Brown v. Rowe Chevrolet-Buick, Inc., 86 N.C. App. 222 , 357 S.E.2d 181 (1987) (court lacks discretion and must grant continuance where attorney has given no prior notice of withdrawal). … Mills v. Mills, 348 S.E.2d 250, 252 (Va. 1986).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Beal v. KH STEPHENSON SUPPLY CO., INC.

    36 N.C. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1978

    Summey v. Cauthen, 283 *508 N.C. 640, 197 S.E. 2d 549 (1973); Brokers, Inc. v. High Point City Board of Ed., 33 N.C. App. 24 , 234 S.E. 2d 56 (1977), cert. den., 293 N.C. 159 , 236 S.E. 2d 702 . … Bishop v. DuBose, 252 N.C. 158 , 113 S.E. 2d 309 (1960). In Products Corporation v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Watson v. Dixon

    132 N.C. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 1999

    Maintenance Equipment Co. v. Godley Builders, 107 N.C. … Brown v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 93 N.C. App. 431, 438 , 378 S.E.2d 232, 236-37 (1989).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Horne

    59 N.C. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1982

    Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 684 , 85 S.Ct. 741 (1965); State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972); State v. Vestal supra; State v. Banks, 250 N.C. 728 , 110 S.E. 2d 322 (1959). … State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 41 , 265 S.E. 2d 191 (1980).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Hudson

    19 N.C. App. 440 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1973

    Judge Mor *442 ris covered this point succinctly in State v. Brown, 1 N.C. App. 145, 149 , 160 S.E. 2d 508, 512 (1969) when she said: “The general rule followed in the majority of jurisdictions is stated in 53 Am. … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gainey v. North Carolina Department of Justice

    121 N.C. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 1996

    See Dockside Discotheque v. Board of Adjustment of Southern Pines, 115 N.C. … United States v. Falk, 479 F.2d 616, 618-19 (7th Cir. 1973); Walters v. Blair, 120 N.C. App. 398, 400 , 462 S.E.2d 232, 233-34 (1995).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Patterson

    146 N.C. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 2001

    Moreover, the decedent’s statements in Brown rebutted testimony by the defendant that her marriage to the victim was a happy marriage. … However, as in Brown , these facts tend to show the victim’s state of mind as to his relationship with defendant and were therefore admissible under Rule 803(3). See State v. Exum, 128 N.C.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Oakley

    75 N.C. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1985

    State v. Hill, 294 N.C. 320 , 240 S.E. 2d 794 (1978); State v. Brown, 59 N.C. App. 411 , 296 S.E. 2d 839 (1982), cert. denied, 310 N.C. 155 , 311 S.E. 2d *103 294 (1984); In re Tuttle, 36 N.C. … United States v. Hecht, 638 F. 2d 651, 657 (3d Cir. 1981); State v. Shrader, 290 N.C. 253 , 225 S.E. 2d 522 (1976); State v. Shelly, 280 N.C. 300 , 185 S.E. 2d 702 (1972).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Gwynne

    64 N.C. App. 51 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1983

    Young v. Hardwood Co., 200 N.C. 310, 312 , 156 S.E. 501, 502 (1931); Kelly v. Shoe Co., 190 N.C. 406, 410 , 130 S.E. 32 , 35 (1925); Stanford v. Grocery Co., 143 N.C. 419, 426 , 55 S.E. 815, 817 (1906). … Brown v. Martin, 176 N.C. 31, 33 , 96 S.E. 642, 643 (1918) (citation omitted). See also Carver v. Lykes, 262 N.C. 345 , 137 S.E. 2d 139 (1964).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Du Plessis v. Du Plessis

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2025

    E.g., Smith v. Smith, 928 So. 2d 287 (Ala. Civ. … ” -7- DU PLESSIS V. DU PLESSIS Opinion of the Court JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat’l Ass’n v. Browning, 230 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.