Case law

State v. Garnett

4 N.C. App. 367 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1969

State v. Brown, 266 N.C. 55 , 145 S.E. 2d 297 . The question arises as to whether the error was prejudicial to the defendant. In 3 Strong, N.C’. … State v. Morgan, 268 N.C. 214 , 150 S.E. 2d 377 ; State v. Booker, 250 N.C. 272 , 108 S.E. 2d 426 ; State v. Troutman, 249 N.C. 398 , 106 S.E. 2d 572 ; State v. Cephus, 241 N.C. 562 , 86 S.E. 2d 70 ; State v.

State v. Randall

259 N.C. App. 885 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 2018

STATE V. … See State v. Brown, 170 N.C. App. 601, 609, 613 S.E.2d 284, 288 (2005), superseded by statute on other grounds, State v. Norman, 202 N.C.

Gaines v. Cumberland County Hosp. System

195 N.C. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 2009

Brown v. Neal, 283 N.C. 604 , 611, 197 S.E.2d 505 , 509 (1973) (citation omitted). In support of their argument on proximate cause, plaintiffs rely almost entirely on the deposition testimony of Dr. … Lane v.

State v. Withers

193 N.C. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 21, 2008

State v. Crawford, 344 N.C. 65, 73 , 472 S.E.2d 920, 925 (1996). … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). Contradictions and discrepancies in the evidence are to be disregarded and left for resolution by a jury. State v.

Duggins v. Town of Walnut Cove

63 N.C. App. 684 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1983

See Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 , 100 S.Ct. 2671 , 65 L.Ed. 2d 784 (1980), and Mobile Home Sales, Inc. v. Tomlinson, 276 N.C. 661 , 174 S.E. 2d 542 (1970). … We believe that the method of construction of homes may be determined by a city governing *689 board as affecting the price of homes.

Teague v. Springfield Life Insurance Co.

55 N.C. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 1982

Sloan v. Light Co., 248 N.C. 125 , 102 S.E. 2d 822 (1958). This is true as to insanity, Tomlins v. Cranford, 227 N.C. 323 , 42 S.E. 2d 100 (1947); Ballew v. Clark, 24 N.C. 23 (1841); malice, State v. … Zebulon v. Dawson, 216 N.C. 520, 522 , 5 S.E. 2d 535, 537 (1939). In Sumner v.

Keith v. Day

60 N.C. App. 559 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 1, 1983

Bivens v. Board of Public Education, 284 F. Supp. 888 (D.C. Ga. 1967). … Reinders Brothers v. Rain Bird, 627 F. 2d 44 (7th Cir. 1980); Roth v.

In re the Estates of Barrow

122 N.C. App. 717 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1996

See Helms v. Young-Woodard, 104 N.C. … See, Liner v. Brown, 117 N.C.

West Durham Lumber Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

12 N.C. App. 641 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1971

Dixon v. Horne, 180 N.C. 585 , 105 S.E. 270 ; Morton v. Water Co., 168 N.C. 582 , 84 S.E. 1019 . … Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Board of Education, 15 F. 2d 317 (4th Cir. 1926) involved a contract for construction of a public building and was controlled by statute. Hipwell v.

C.F.R. Foods, Inc. v. Randolph Development Co.

107 N.C. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1992

In Rowan County Board of Education v. U.S. … Terry v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 83 , 273 S.E.2d 674, 677 (1981) (quoting Ragsdale v. Kennedy, 286 N.C. 130, 138 , 209 S.E.2d 494, 500 (1974)); accord Cofield v. Griffin, 238 N.C. 377, 379 , 78 S.E.2d 131, 133 (1953).

Joyce v. Winston-Salem State University

91 N.C. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 1988

See Comr. of Insurance v. Rate Bureau, 300 N.C. 381 , 269 S.E. 2d 547 (1980). … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). If an agency deci *158 sion is not supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted, it may be reversed.

Hollin v. Johnston County Council on Aging

181 N.C. App. 77 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2007

See, e.g., Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. Pettey, 944 S.W.2d 524, 527 (Ark. 1997); Smith v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 447 P.2d 365, 373 (Cal. 1968); Whale Communications v. Osborn, 759 P.2d 848, 848 (Colo. … Defendant argues that this Court’s decision in Franklin v. Board of Education, 29 N.C.

State v. Tsilimos

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2014

As explained by this Court in State v. Burroughs, 185 N.C. … In analyzing the reasonableness of a checkpoint, this Court balances the public's interest and the individual's privacy interest by applying the three-prong test set out in Brown v.

Johnson v. Whittington

42 N.C. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1979

Defendant did not pay them and plaintiff filed a complaint with the Labor Board. Defendant then paid plaintiff the $45.00 he claimed was owed to him. … Gray v.

Miller v. Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc.

173 N.C. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 20, 2005

He graduated from an accredited medical school, is board-certified by the American Board of Anesthesia, and holds a sub-certification in pain medicine. Plaintiffs tendered Dr. … Cunningham v. Riley, 169 N.C. App. 600, 605 , 611 S.E.2d 423, 426 (2005); Dep’t of Transp. v. Mfd. Housing, Inc., 160 N.C. App. 461 , 586 S.E.2d 780 (2003).

State v. Lynch

217 N.C. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2011

State v. Brown, 357 N.C. 382, 390 , 584 S.E.2d 278, 283 (2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1194 , 158 L.Ed. 2d 106 (2004). The record shows that defense counsel asked Mr. … The State cites State v. Bell in support of its argument that defendant was not prejudiced by the exclusion of Mr. Tinnin’s prior convictions, but we find State v.

State v. Wilson

112 N.C. App. 777 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1993

See Minnesota v. Dickerson, 113 S.Ct. 2130 , 124 L. Ed. 2d 334 (1993) (requiring illegal character of contraband to be immediately apparent); State v. Church, 110 N.C. … State v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 75 L.

State v. Patterson

182 N.C. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2007

See State v. … State v.

McIlwaine v. Williams

155 N.C. App. 426 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

See Hill v. Hill, 11 N.C. … Brown, 64 N.C.

Carlisle v. COMMODORE CORPORATION

15 N.C. App. 650 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 23, 1972

It seems clear that a pre-existing debt is sufficient consideration to support a chattel mortgage, Brown v. Mitchell, 168 N.C. 312, at 314 , 84 S.E. 404 ; and to support the execution of a mortgage or deed of trust. … Fowle v. McLean, 168 N.C. 537, at 541 , 84 S.E. 852 . Does the position of Mr. and Mr.