Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.88s

  • Johnson v. Harris

    149 N.C. App. 928 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2002

    Brooks v. Giesey, 334 N.C. 303, 319 , 432 S.E.2d 339, 348 (1993). … “An improper purpose is ‘any purpose other than one to vindicate rights ... or to put claims of right to a proper test.’ ” Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377, 382 , 477 S.E.2d 234, 238 (1996) (quoting Mack v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Peeler v. Southern Railway Co.

    32 N.C. App. 759 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1977

    Adams v. Board of Education, 248 N.C. 506 , 103 S.E. 2d 854 . … Hampton v. Hawkins, 219 N.C. 205 , 13 S.E. 2d 227 .” Faircloth v. R.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Appeal of Whittington

    129 N.C. App. 259 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1998

    Appellant contends that the Property Tax Commission, sitting as the State Board of Equalization and Review, erred in determining that tobacco allotments must be considered. We disagree. … Garris v. Scott, 246 N.C. 568, 575 , 99 S.E.2d 750, 755 (1957).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Baccus v. N.C. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety

    195 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 20, 2009

    Brown, Been There, Doing That in a Title 32 Status: The National Guard Now Authorized to Perform its 400-Year Old Domestic Mission in Title 32 Status, 2008 Army Law. 23 , 29 [hereinafter, Brown, Title 32 Status]. … See, e.g., Sullivan v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 22 P.3d 535, 539 (Colo. Ct.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover County

    166 N.C. App. 333 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 2004

    Coastal appeals from orders granting summary judgment on all claims to defendants New Hanover County and the New Hanover County Board of Commissioners (“the County”), Kure Beach, and Carolina Beach and granting partial summary … See also Bernick v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Nationsbank Corp.

    125 N.C. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1997

    Johnson v. Brown, 71 N.C. App. 660, 668 , 323 S.E.2d 389, 394-95 (1984). Furthermore, defendants do not point to any terms of the trust that restrict the beneficiaries’ rights to view the trust instrument. … Ct, Orange County 1949); Branch v. White, 239 A.2d 665, 671 (N.J. Super.), cert. *520 denied, 242 A.2d 13 (N.J. 1968); Karpf v. Karpf, 481 N.W.2d 891, 896-97 (Neb. Sup. Ct. 1992); Eddy v. Colonial Life Ins.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Jack H. Winslow Farms, Inc. v. Dedmon

    171 N.C. App. 754 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2005

    See Bernick v. … v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Estate of Teel Ex Rel. Naddeo v. Darby

    129 N.C. App. 604 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1998

    As a result of the accident, on 7 October 1994, plaintiff instituted this action against Monroe Oil Company, the City of Monroe Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control, Liston S. … Further, in Greitzer v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Price & Price Mechanical of N.C., Inc. v. Miken Corp.

    191 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2008

    Best v. N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners, 108 N.C. App. 158, 161 , 423 S.E.2d 330, 332 (1992), disc, review denied, 333 N.C. 461 , 428 S.E.2d 184 (1993). … Harris v. Ray Johnson Constr. Co., 139 N.C. App. 827, 829 , 534 S.E.2d 653, 654 (2000). I.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Honorable Lacy Thornburg v. Consolidated Judicial Retirement System

    137 N.C. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 2000

    . *152 Morris v. Bailey, 86 N.C. App. 378, 387 , 358 S.E.2d 120, 126 (1987). See also Falls v. Falls, 52 N.C. … Tay v. Flaherty, 100 N.C. App. 51, 57 , 394 S.E.2d 217, 220 , disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 643 , 399 S.E.2d 132 (1990).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Semelka v. The Univ. of N.C.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2023

    Stat. § 150B- 1 et seq., by petitioning for judicial review of the final termination decision made by UNC-CH’s Board of Governors (“BOG”). … See Veazey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Basmas v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association

    236 N.C. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 2014

    App. at 117, 661 S.E.2d at 780 (quoting Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420, 423, 524 S.E.2d 95, 98 (2000)). III. … Nicholson v. Jackson Cty. School Bd., 170 N.C. App. 650, 654-55, 614 S.E.2d 319, 322 (2005) (quoting Bockweg v. Anderson, 333 N.C. 486, 491, 428 S.E.2d 157, 161 (1993), and Green v. Dixon, 137 N.C.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • University of North Carolina v. Town of Carrboro

    15 N.C. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1972

    G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56; Kessing v. … Construction Co. v. Raleigh, 230 N.C. 365 , 53 S.E. 2d 165 . In exerting this authority, it ‘may fix a different rate from that charged within the corporate limits’. G.S. 160-256” Fulghum v. Selma and Griffis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Weary

    124 N.C. App. 754 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 1996

    State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 58 , 337 S.E.2d 808, 827 (1985). Defendant contends that since she was hired as an “independent contractor,” she was not an “agent” of Genetic Design as contemplated by N.C.G.S. § 14-254. … State v. McLean, 209 N.C. 38, 40 , 182 S.E. 700, 702 (1935).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Toledo

    204 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 18, 2010

    United States v. Dickey-Bey, 393 F.3d 449, 453-54 (4th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted). See also, California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565, 570 , 114 L. … In Thornton v. United States, 541 U.S. 615 , 158 L.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dyer v. Bradshaw

    54 N.C. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

    See also Advertising Co. v. Bradshaw, Sec. of Transportation, 48 N.C. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed. 2d 548 (1972). The order dismissing the action is affirmed. Affirmed. Judges ARNOLD and Webb concur.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Eisinger v. Robinson

    164 N.C. App. 572 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 2004

    Robert Brown. Plaintiff’s other requests are for deposition costs of another doctor, a highway patrolman, and plaintiff himself. The arbitration agreement states expert witness fees are not recoverable by plaintiff. … This exact argument was asserted by the plaintiff in Palmer v. Duke Power Co., 129 N.C. App. 488 , 499 S.E.2d 801 (1998).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sharpe v. Worland

    137 N.C. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 2000

    Plaintiff responds, relying on Shelton v. … Co. v. Dahners, 350 N.C. 583 , 516 S.E.2d 592 (1999); Jones v. Jones, 52 N.C. App. 104 , 278 S.E.2d 260 , (1981).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Songwooyarn Trading Co. v. Sox Eleven, Inc.

    213 N.C. App. 49 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2011

    Meyer v. … In Dalton v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.

    186 N.C. App. 474 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2007

    Morris v. … Corp. v.

    Reversed by Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 362 N.C. 457 (2008)Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.