Case law

Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Weaver

61 N.C. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1983

Highway Commission v. Nuckles, supra; Board of Transportation v. Revis, supra. … Nuckles, supra and Board of Transportation v. Revis, supra. In Redevelopment Commission v.

Gregory v. Town of Plymouth

60 N.C. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 1983

Conover v. Newton, 297 N.C. 506 , 256 S.E. 2d 216 (1979); Williams v. Town of Grifton, 22 N.C. App. 611 , 207 S.E. 2d 275 (1974). … Rexham v. Town of Pineville, 26 N.C. App. 349 , 216 S.E. 2d 445 (1975).

K&S Res.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2022

Brown, Faucher, Peraldo & Benson, PLLC, by Drew Brown, for defendant- appellant. Gordon Law Offices, by Harry G. Gordon, for plaintiff-appellee. GORE, Judge. … K&S RES., LLC V.

State v. Tarantino

83 N.C. App. 473 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1986

State v. Cooke, 306 N.C. 132 , 291 S.E. 2d 618 (1982). … See United States v. Burnette, 698 F. 2d 1038 (9th Cir. 1983).

Williamson Produce, Inc. v. Satcher

122 N.C. App. 589 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1996

Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281, 285 , 350 *594 S.E.2d 111, 114 (1986). It is well settled, however, “that a defendant need not physically enter North Carolina in order for personal jurisdiction to arise.” … Chapman v. Janko, U.S.A., 120 N.C. App. 371 376 , 462 S.E.2d 534, 538 (1995).

State v. Williams

20 N.C. App. 639 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 1974

Included among these is the unconditional discharge of a parolee by the Board of Paroles. Though the 1973 amendment was enacted after defendant was indicted, it is applicable in this case. State v. … App. 241 , 198 S.E. 2d 491 ; State v. Cobb, 284 N.C. 573 , 201 S.E. 2d 878 (opinion filed 25 January 1974), reversing 18 N.C. App. 221 , 196 S.E. 2d 521 . Judgment arrested. Judges Britt and Vaughn concur.

State v. Spencer

7 N.C. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1970

State v. Brown, 221 N.C. 301 , 20 S.E. 2d 286 ; State v. Hatcher, 210 N.C. 55 , 185 S.E. 435 . Interpretations of statutes should not be made which lead to strained constructions or ridiculous results. State v. … State v. Morris, supra.

State v. Courtney

259 N.C. App. 635 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 2018

This protection “serves a constitutional policy of finality for the defendant’s benefit[,]” Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165, 97 S. Ct. 2221, 2225, 53 L. … “Where successive prosecutions are at stake, the guarantee serves ‘a constitutional policy of finality for the defendant’s benefit.’ ” Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165, 97 S. Ct. 2221, 2225, 53 L.

Johnson v. Stanley

96 N.C. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1989

See, e.g., Chaplin v. Sanders, 100 Wash. 2d 853 , 676 P.2d 431 (1984); Svoboda v. Johnson, 204 Neb. 57 , 281 N.W.2d 892, 898 (1979); H.L. Brown & Assocs., Inc. v. McMahon, 525 S.W.2d 553, 558 (Tex. Civ. App. 1975). … See Amos v. Bateman, 68 N.C. App. 46, 51 , 314 S.E.2d 129, 131-32 (1984); Orange Grocery Co. v. CPHC Investors, 63 N.C. App. 136 , 304 S.E.2d 259 (1983).

Edens v. Foulks

2 N.C. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 18, 1968

The rule was clearly enunciated by Taylor, C.J., speaking for the Court in Browne v. Blick, 7 N.C. 511 , 519: “No one shall have an action of waste unless he hath the immediate estate of inheritance.” See Latham v. … In Starnes v.

State v. Boothe

201 N.C. App. 726 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 2010

State v. Brown, 178 N.C. App. 189, 194 , 631 S.E.2d 49, 53 (2006) (quotations and citations omitted). A. 07 CRS 0053552. … Brown, 178 N.C. App. at 195 , 631 S.E.2d at 53 (quotations and citations omitted) (alteration in original).

In Re BNS

182 N.C. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2007

Our Supreme Court stated in Brown v. Flowe, "Legislative intent controls the meaning of a statute. … State v. Haskins, 160 N.C.App. 349, 352 , 585 S.E.2d 766, 769 (quoting In re Cowley, 120 N.C.App. 274, 276 , 461 S.E.2d 804, 806 (1995)), appeal dismissed, 357 N.C. 580 , 589 S.E.2d 356 (2003). N.C.

State v. Ingram

65 N.C. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1983

See State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 164-65 , 293 S.E. 2d 569, 578 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 503 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982). … See also State v.

Nobles v. First Carolina Communications, Inc.

108 N.C. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1992

Insofar as the trial court failed to find that plaintiff’s motion to amend judgment pursuant to Rule 52(b) was untimely, plaintiff’s notice of appeal in the present case was appropriately given on 27 December 1990 after Judge Brown … See Perry v. Union Camp Corp., supra.

Vereen v. North Carolina Department of Correction

168 N.C. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2005

Cornell v. Western & S. Life Ins. Co., 162 N.C. App. 106, 108 , 590 S.E.2d 294, 296 (2004). … See Horney v. Pool Co., 267 N.C. 521, 527 , 148 S.E.2d 554, 559 (1966).

State v. Norman

202 N.C. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2010

State v. Shoff 118 N.C. App. 724, 725 , 456 S.E.2d 875, 876 (1995). In State v. Brown, 170 N.C. … See, e.g., Sara Lee Corp. v.

Payne v. Buffalo Reinsurance Co.

69 N.C. App. 551 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 1984

North Carolina National Bank v. Gillespie

28 N.C. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1976

Caldwell v. Deese, 288 N.C. 875 , 378, 218 S.E. 2d 379 (1975). … Defendant relies on Langston v.

Pickard Roofing Co., Inc. v. Barbour

94 N.C. App. 688 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 1989

Shankle, supra; Brown v. Rowe Chevrolet-Buick, 86 N.C. App. 222 , 357 S.E. 2d 181 (1987). The cases which defendant advances to support his position can clearly be distinguished from the case sub judice. … In Smith v.

State v. Jordan

174 N.C. App. 479 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 15, 2005

See also State v. Brown, 87 N.C. … In State v. Wissink, 172 N.C.