Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,157 results
1.27s
254 N.C. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2017
Warren v. New Hanover County Board of Education, 104 N.C. App. 522, 410 S.E.2d 232 (1991), provides another example of the significance of the context in which the speech at issue is conveyed to others. … about the survey results at a public school board meeting.”
Cited 2 timesPublished54 N.C. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1981
of Trustees,” implies that defendant did not have the consent of the Board of Trustees. … See State v. Jordan, 49 N.C.
Cited 10 timesPublished100 N.C. App. 651 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1990
Robinson v. King, 68 N.C. App. 86, 89 , 314 S.E.2d 768, 771 , disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 762 , 321 S.E.2d 144 (1984). The meaning of the terms of the deed is a question of law, not of fact. Brown v. … In Robinson v. King, 68 N.C.
Cited 6 timesPublishedViolette v. The Town of Cornelius
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2022
VIOLETTE V. … The Town’s Planning Board reviewed and recommended approval of the application on 10 August 2020. The Town’s Board of Commissioners approved the application on 5 October 2020.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHuggins v. Hallmark Enterprises, Inc.
84 N.C. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1987
As stated in Coble v. Brown, 1 N.C. … Baylor v. Brown, 46 N.C. App. 664 , 266 S.E. 2d 9 (1980). In addition to these requirements, the mov-ant must also show that he has a meritorious defense. Sides v. Reid, 35 N.C. App. 235 , 241 S.E. 2d 110 (1978).
Cited 28 timesPublished33 N.C. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1977
Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 689 , 92 S.Ct. 1877 , 32 L.Ed. 2d 411 (1972) (emphasis added). See, State v. Henderson, 285 N.C. 1 , 203 S.E. 2d 10 (1974). … In State v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWallace v. Town of Chapel Hill
93 N.C. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1989
In re Annexation Ordinance, 255 N.C. 633, 646 , 122 S.E. 2d 690, 700 (1961); see also Cockrell v. … Co. v. City of Newton, 75 N.C.
Cited 7 timesPublished66 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1984
State v. McKinney, 288 N.C. 113 , 215 S.E. 2d 578 (1975); see State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95 , 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980). … Although defendant testified that his brother was driving a brown, two-door, Toyota Célica when he came to visit in March, the vehicle was not stolen until June.
Cited 12 timesPublishedAmerican Greetings Corp. v. Town of Alexander Mills
128 N.C. App. 727 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1998
See R.R. v. Hook, 261 N.C. 517, 520 , 135 S.E.2d 562, 565 (1964); see also Huntley v. Potter, 255 N.C. 619, 627 , 122 S.E.2d 681, 686 (1961). … The facts of this case are inapposite to those of Shackelford v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedIn Re the Foreclosure by Simpson
211 N.C. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 2011
Network, Inc. v. … Shelton, 486 F.3d 815, 819 (4th Cir. 2007) (“ ‘[Although the right to rescind [under the TILA] is *489 [statutory], it remains an equitable doctrine subject to equitable considerations.’ ” (quoting Brown v.
Cited 44 timesPublished146 N.C. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 2001
Tucker v. General Telephone Co., 50 N.C. App. 112 , 272 S.E.2d 911 (1980). We will not engage in speculation as to the legal or factual basis for the jury award of damages, Pharr v. Worley, 125 N.C. … Stat. § 1-440.1 (a); see Edwards v. Brown's Cabinets, 63 N.C. App. 524 , 305 S.E.2d 765 , disc. review denied, 309 N.C. 632 , 308 S.E.2d 64 (1983).
Cited 7 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 2022
First, in Watson v. … But those boarding services are unrelated to the claims in this case; they were invoices for boarding Beau at the Schaub Defendants’ farm in Florida and have no connection to the sale of Season and, later,
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Press Ass'n v. Spangler
94 N.C. App. 694 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 1989
Hayes v. Browne, 76 N.C. App. 98, 101 , 331 S.E. 2d 763, 764-65 (1985), cert denied, 315 N.C. 587 , 341 S.E. 2d 25 (1986). Likewise, respondents here have the burden of showing justification for nondisclosure.
Cited 2 timesPublished227 N.C. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 2013
Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97 , 408 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1991). … White v. White, 312 N.C. 770, 777 , 324 S.E.2d 829, 833 (1985). A.
Cited 21 timesPublishedWise v. Harrington Grove Community Ass'n
151 N.C. App. 344 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2002
If the executive board fails to appoint an adjudicatory panel to hear such matters, hearings under this section shall be held before the executive board. … State v. Thomas, 332 N.C. 544, 554 , 423 S.E.2d 75, 80 (1992) (citing N.C.R. App. P. 10(a)), disapproved on other grounds, State v. Richmond, 347 N.C. 412 , 495 S.E.2d 677 (1998); see also Koufman v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRichmond Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Cowell
243 N.C. App. 116 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 1, 2015
COA14-1115 Filed: 1 September 2015 Wake County, No. 12 CVS 002414 RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff, v. … V. COWELL ET AL. Opinion of the Court In Mussallam v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWise v. HARRINGTON GROVE COMMUNITY ASS'N
566 S.E.2d 499 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2002
Wise, Plaintiffs, v. … If the executive board fails to appoint an adjudicatory panel to hear such matters, hearings under this section shall be held before the executive board.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 N.C. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 17, 1969
Smith v. Thompson, 210 N.C. 672 , 188 S.E. 395 . … Board of Education v. Wilson, 215 N.C. 216 , 1 S.E. 2d 544 . Plaintiff also urges that this Court abolish the distinction between releases and covenants not to sue.
Cited 9 timesPublished140 N.C. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2000
See also State v. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 75 L. Ed. 2d 502, 514 (1983).
Cited 22 timesPublished31 N.C. App. 224 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1976
We need not consider whether proof of this alleged warranty violates the parol evidence rule, see Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537 , 61 S.E. 2d 603 (1950), reh. den., 233 N.C. 617 (1951).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna