Case law

State v. Edwards

8 N.C. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 24, 1970

In State v. … State v. Brown, 266 N.C. 55 , 145 S.E. 2d 297 (1965). The questions propounded by the solicitor in the present case were within the bounds of the rules.

State v. Jones

24 N.C. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 1974

State v. Watson, 19 N.C. App. 160 , 198 S.E. 2d 185 . … feet from the prosecuting witness; that the prosecuting witnesses Pattie Ray and Evelyn Mitchell determined that the defendant was of the black race, approximately six feet tall, dark hair, with a medium Afro, eyes were brown

In Re the Foreclosure by Simpson

211 N.C. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 2011

Network, Inc. v. … Shelton, 486 F.3d 815, 819 (4th Cir. 2007) (“ ‘[Although the right to rescind [under the TILA] is *489 [statutory], it remains an equitable doctrine subject to equitable considerations.’ ” (quoting Brown v.

State v. Oliver

73 N.C. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1985

In State v. … See, e.g., State v.

In re: K.R.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 2026

v. … App. at 621, 625 S.E.2d at 116; Brown, 176 N.C. App. at 505, 626 S.E.2d at 753. V.

Holland v. Harrison

254 N.C. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2017

Warren v. New Hanover County Board of Education, 104 N.C. App. 522, 410 S.E.2d 232 (1991), provides another example of the significance of the context in which the speech at issue is conveyed to others. … about the survey results at a public school board meeting.”

Coleman v. Cooper

102 N.C. App. 650 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1991

McNeill v. Durham County ABC Board, 87 N.C. App. 50 , 359 S.E.2d 500 (1987), modified on other ground, 322 N.C. 425 , 368 S.E.2d 619 , reh’g denied, 322 N.C. 838 , 371 S.E.2d 278 (1988). Hare v. Butler, 99 N.C. … Smith v. Hefner, 235 N.C. 1, 6 , 68 S.E.2d 783, 787 (1952).

State v. Pennell

54 N.C. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1981

of Trustees,” implies that defendant did not have the consent of the Board of Trustees. … See State v. Jordan, 49 N.C.

Mason-Reel v. Simpson

100 N.C. App. 651 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1990

Robinson v. King, 68 N.C. App. 86, 89 , 314 S.E.2d 768, 771 , disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 762 , 321 S.E.2d 144 (1984). The meaning of the terms of the deed is a question of law, not of fact. Brown v. … In Robinson v. King, 68 N.C.

State v. Mebane

61 N.C. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1983

State v. Dunlap, 298 N.C. 725 , 259 S.E. 2d 893 (1979); State v. Lynch, 279 N.C. 1 , 181 S.E. 2d 561 (1971); State v. Harris, 46 N.C. App. 284 , 264 S.E. 2d 790 (1980). In the present case, Detective J. W. … State v. *320 Monk, 291 N.C. 37 , 229 S.E. 2d 163 (1976); State v. Brown, 56 N.C. App. 390 , 289 S.E. 2d 142 (1982). We find this assignment of error without merit.

Wallace v. Town of Chapel Hill

93 N.C. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1989

In re Annexation Ordinance, 255 N.C. 633, 646 , 122 S.E. 2d 690, 700 (1961); see also Cockrell v. … Co. v. City of Newton, 75 N.C.

State ex rel. Banking Commission v. Lexington State Bank

12 N.C. App. 232 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 1971

Campbell v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 263 N.C. 224 , 139 S.E. 2d 197 (1964) ; State of North Carolina On Relation of the Banking Commission, and First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company v. Bank of Rocky Mount, 12 N.C.

Hodges v. Wellons

9 N.C. App. 152 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1970

Woodell v. Davis, supra. … Wood-ell v. Davis, supra.

In re A.R.

227 N.C. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 2013

Koufman v. Koufman, 330 N.C. 93, 97 , 408 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1991). … White v. White, 312 N.C. 770, 777 , 324 S.E.2d 829, 833 (1985). A.

In Re the Appeal of Appalachian Student Housing Corp.

165 N.C. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2004

The ASU Board of Trustees approved the construction project and formation of the corporation. … Conversely, in Latta v.

North Carolina Press Ass'n v. Spangler

94 N.C. App. 694 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 1989

Hayes v. Browne, 76 N.C. App. 98, 101 , 331 S.E. 2d 763, 764-65 (1985), cert denied, 315 N.C. 587 , 341 S.E. 2d 25 (1986). Likewise, respondents here have the burden of showing justification for nondisclosure.

State v. Hall

52 N.C. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1981

Clearly, the caretaking function of an inventory would have been properly fulfilled in this case by simply listing on the inventory sheet “one, brown plastic bottle.” See State v. Daniel, 589 P. 2d 408 (Alaska 1979). … See also State v.

Hoolapa v. Hoolapa

105 N.C. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 1992

In re Brown, 23 N.C. App. 109, 110 , 208 S.E.2d 282, 283 (1974). Here, the trial court clearly had both personal and subject matter jurisdiction. Id. The order cannot then be “void” pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4). … Sink v. Easter, 288 N.C. 183, 198 , 217 S.E.2d 532, 541 (1975). The trial judge erred neither in law nor in his findings of fact.

State v. Lofton

66 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1984

State v. McKinney, 288 N.C. 113 , 215 S.E. 2d 578 (1975); see State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95 , 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980). … Although defendant testified that his brother was driving a brown, two-door, Toyota Célica when he came to visit in March, the vehicle was not stolen until June.

State v. Lane

119 N.C. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1995

State v. Brown, 64 N.C. App. 637, 644-46 , 308 S.E.2d 346, 350-51 (1983), aff'd, 310 N.C. 563 , 313 S.E.2d 585 (1984). … State v.