Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.43s

  • Beam v. Floyd's Creek Baptist Church

    99 N.C. App. 767 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 1990

    Sparks v. Mountain Breeze Restaurant & Fish House, Inc., 55 N.C. App. 663, 664 , 286 S.E.2d 575, 576 (1982). … Bradley v. E.B. Sportswear, Inc., 77 N.C. App. 450, 452 , 335 S.E.2d 52, 53 (1985).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Rohrer v. Credle

    86 N.C. App. 633 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 1987

    Thus, it has become the law of the case, Gower v. … Builders Supplies Co. v. Gainey, 282 N.C. 261, 267 , 192 S.E. 2d 449, 453 (1972); Council v. Sanderlin, 183 N.C. 254 , 111 S.E. 265 (1922). Second, in Collins v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Immanuel Baptist Tabernacle Church of the Apostolic Faith v. Southern Emmanuel Tabernacle Church, Apostolic Faith

    27 N.C. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 1, 1975

    pertinent part: “The trustees of any religious body may mortgage or sell and convey in fee simple any land owned by such body, when directed so to do by such church, congregation, society or denomination, or its committee, board … See Atkins v. Walker, 284 N.C. 306, 319 , 200 S.E. 2d 641 (1973). On sufficient evidence, the court found that “the affairs of the plaintiff church are conducted by the congregation.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Tejal Vyas, LLC v. Carriage Park Ltd. Partnership

    166 N.C. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

    Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281, 285 , 350 S.E.2d 111, 114 (1986). A court must engage in a two-part inquiry to determine whether personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant is properly asserted. … Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 626, 632 , 394 S.E.2d 651, 656 (1990). The facts of each case determine whether the defendant’s activities in the forum state satisfy due process. Perkins v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Krueger v. North Carolina Criminal Justice Education & Training Standards Commission

    230 N.C. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2013

    App. 647, 654 , 313 S.E.2d 880, 885 (holding that “the Board’s authority to regulate the licensing of dental hygienists is within the police power of the State, and that the Board’s action in the present case [suspending … Com’r of Ins. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shipman v. Shipman

    155 N.C. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

    Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C.App. 420, 423 , 524 S.E.2d 95, 97 (2000). … Garrett v. Garrett, 121 N.C.App. 192 , 464 S.E.2d 716 (1995). In determining whether to modify a child custody order, the trial court must focus on the effect on the child. Browning v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brody

    251 N.C. App. 812 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2017

    State v. Brown, 199 N.C. App. 253, 257, 681 S.E.2d 460, 463 (2009). “In utilizing an informant’s tip, probable -6- STATE V. … See, e.g., State v. Edwards, 185 N.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Park v. Carroll

    18 N.C. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 25, 1973

    In Morisey v. Brown, 144 N.C. 154 , 56 S.E. 704 (1907), a devise of “the residue of my lands in Sampson County” (em *57 phasis added) was held to be specific. … In Nebel v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Hensley

    77 N.C. App. 192 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 1, 1985

    State v. Richardson, 70 N.C. App. 509, 514, n. 1 , 320 S.E. 2d 900, 903, n. 1 (1984); State v. Edmondson, 70 N.C. App. 426 , 320 S.E. 2d 315 (1984); State v. Downing, 66 N.C. … State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237, 250 , 321 S.E. 2d 856, 863-64 (1984).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Cross v. Residential Support Services, Inc.

    129 N.C. App. 374 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1998

    Cross v. Residential Support Services, Inc., 123 N.C. App. 616, 622 , 473 S.E.2d 676, 679 (1996) (Cross I). … In Lyles , our Supreme Court held that the “insurance and risk management” agreement between the City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, and the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education was not a local government risk pool

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Humphrey v. Hill

    55 N.C. App. 359 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1982

    Nantz v. Employment Security Comm., 290 N.C. 473 , 226 S.E. 2d 340 (1976); Tatum v. Brown, 29 N.C. … See Tuttle v. Kernersville Lumber Co., 263 N.C. 216 , 139 S.E. 2d 249 (1964); F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. Hall, 68 F. 2d 533 (4th Cir. 1934), Jones v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Wise v. HARRINGTON GROVE COMMUNITY ASS'N

    566 S.E.2d 499 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2002

    Wise, Plaintiffs, v. … If the executive board fails to appoint an adjudicatory panel to hear such matters, hearings under this section shall be held before the executive board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Motorists Insurance v. Avnet, Inc.

    98 N.C. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 1, 1990

    Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 429 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Department of Transportation v. McDarris

    62 N.C. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1983

    As our Supreme Court opined in Board of Transportation v. … Cf., Board of Transportation v. Warehouse Corp., 300 N.C. 700 , 268 S.E. 2d 180 (1980) (taking incidental to enactment of valid traffic regulations, pursuant to exercise of State’s police power, not compensable). B.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kimler v. Crossings at Sugar Hill Prop. Owner's Ass'n, Inc.

    248 N.C. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2016

    BROWN, PATRICIA A. BROWN, BARRY E. HOUGH, ANNE S. HOUGH, THOMAS P. STIVES, NORMA P. STIVES, JANE F. HUMPHREYS, PHILLIP W. TATLER, JR., SALLY L. TATLER, RONNIE MANGUM, MELODY MANGUM, CAROL C. THOMAS, GINA R. … MAZEY, ELENA V. MAZEY, ERNEST SANTIUSTE, ANTONIA SANTIUSTE and RICHARD M. GETTY, Respondents. KIMLER V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Young v. Young

    76 N.C. App. 93 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 1985

    Bishop v. Reinhold, 66 N.C. App. 379, 387 , 311 S.E. 2d 298, 303 , disc. rev. denied, 310 N.C. 743 , 315 S.E. 2d 700 (1984); Combs v. Woodie, 53 N.C. App. 789, 790 , 281 S.E. 2d 705, 706 (1981); Miller v. … Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537, 541 , 61 S.E. 2d 603, 606 (1950), pet. for reh. denied, 233 N.C. 617 , 65 S.E. 2d 144 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Darnell v. North Carolina Department of Transportation & Highway Safety

    30 N.C. App. 328 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 1976

    See Bishop v. Wood, _ U.S _, _ S.Ct. _ (decided 10 June 1976); Slochower v. Board of Ed. of N. Y., 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); Still v. Lance, 279 N.C. 254 , 182 S.E. 2d 403 (1971). … In the recent case of Nantz v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ragan v. County of Alamance

    98 N.C. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1990

    Plaintiffs petitioned the trial judge for a writ of mandamus to issue against defendants, the County of Alamance, its Board of Commissioners, and the Board’s members. … Hightower v. City of Raleigh, 150 N.C. 569, 571 , 65 S.E. 279, 281 (1909).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Horne v. Roadway Package Systems, Inc.

    129 N.C. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1998

    Little v. Anson County Schools Food Service, 295 N.C. 527 , 246 S.E.2d 743 (1978). … App. 439, 448 , 307 S.E.2d 807, 813 (1983), disc. review denied, 310 N.C. 625 , 315 S.E.2d 690 (1984) (quoting Brown v. Neal, 283 N.C. 604 , 197 S.E.2d 505 (1973)). Both Dr. Vanden Bosch and Dr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. McLaurin

    46 N.C. App. 746 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1980

    The language suggested in State v. … State v. Browning, 28 N.C. App. 376 , 221 S.E. 2d 375 (1976). Under the circumstances, it was error for the judge to fail to charge upon the defendant’s right to stand his ground without retreating.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.