Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,157 results
1.21s
242 N.C. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2015
Steffes v. DeLapp, 177 N.C.App. 802 , 804, 629 S.E.2d 892 , 894 (2006). See Griessel v. … V.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFederal Realty Investment Trust v. Belk-Tyler of Elizabeth City, Inc.
56 N.C. App. 363 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1982
We hold, therefore, that Judge Brown’s order striking the plea of waiver was error. … Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc., 288 N.C. 484 , 219 S.E. 2d 190 (1975).
Cited 5 timesPublished165 N.C. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2004
In re Brown, 150 N.C. App. 127 , 129, 562 S.E.2d 583 , 585 (2002) (citing State v. Easterling, 300 N.C. 594 , 268 S.E.2d 800 (1980)). … Brown, 150 N.C. App. at 127 -28 , 562 S.E.2d at 583 . The facts in the case sub judice show that the disturbance created by respondent was substantial.
Cited 0 timesPublished74 N.C. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1985
State v. Brower, 289 N.C. 644 , 224 S.E. 2d 551 (1976). Defendant “must show both that there was error in the denial of the motion and that he was prejudiced thereby before he will be granted a new trial.” State v. … Defendant sought to introduce this prior testimony through cross-examination of the victim Brown, who was not able to identify the person who testified at the probable cause hearing, only that he “heard that someone said
Cited 8 timesPublishedLafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of Robeson
17 N.C. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1972
for the purpose of encouraging and attempting to insure an adequate and continuing service of garbage collection and disposal where the board deems it to be desirable. … Hobbs v. Moore County, 267 N.C. 665 , 149 S.E. 2d 1 (1966).
Cited 0 timesPublished247 N.C. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016
According to the Board, therefore, surety’s motion was insufficient to toll the time for appeal of the underlying order. … See Cavenaugh v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedESTATE OF DARBY, BY DARBY v. Monroe Oil Co., Inc.
127 N.C. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 1997
summary judgment, we find that the record indicates that earlier that evening, Blount on at least two occasions purchased liquor for himself and others from a store operated by the Monroe County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board … State v. Barnette, 304 N.C. 447, 458 , 284 S.E.2d 298, 305 (1981); State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E.2d 741 (1967); State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished108 N.C. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1992
Elks Lodge v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 27 N.C.App. 594 , 220 S.E.2d 106 (1975), disc. review denied, 289 N.C. 296 , 222 S.E.2d 696 (1976). … Elks Lodge v. Board of Alcoholic Control at 603, 220 S.E.2d at 112 .
Cited 6 timesPublished175 N.C. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2005
Thus, under the School Board's reasoning, the notice of forfeiture would have been timely. … See Hayes v.
Cited 15 timesPublished168 N.C. App. 152 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2005
Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984)). “ ‘Whether evidence presented constitutes substantial evidence is a question of law for the court.’ ” State v. … In State v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedGalligan v. Town of Chapel Hill
5 N.C. App. 413 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1969
The resolution of 25 June 1951 of the Board of Aldermen of the Town of Chapel Hill reads as follows: “Upon motion of Alderman Cornwell and seconded by Aider-man Burch, the above Resolution was introduced for passage and the … However, in the case of White v.
Cited 1 timesPublished115 N.C. App. 634 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1994
The responsibility of operating the Fund rests with a five member board. CSF Rules at 3-4. When the CSF receives a claim, it conducts an investigation and then places the claim on the agenda of the next Board meeting. … In Abbitt v.
Cited 14 timesPublished188 N.C. App. 570 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008
We must also note that “our legislature intended the term ‘specialist’ to include a broader category of physicians than those who are board certified.” Sweatt v. Wong, 145 N.C. App. 33, 37 , 549 S.E.2d 222, 224 (2001). … See Cox v. Steffes, 161 N.C.
Cited 13 timesPublishedCourts v. Annie Penn Memorial Hospital, Inc.
111 N.C. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 1993
Knight a list of people whom she wanted to sit on the foundation’s board. … See Atkins v. Parker, 7 N.C.
Cited 16 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2024
State v. Pope, 333 N.C. 106, 114 (1992). … MOORE THOMPSON, J., dissenting cords around her ankles, had handcuffs on her hands, zip ties binding her wrists to her knees, and a brown electrical cord wrapped around her neck and the
Cited 0 timesPublished125 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1997
Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 624 , 400 S.E.2d 736, 740 (1991). The Guidelines utilize the “gross income” of each parent in calculating the amount of a child support obligor’s payments thereunder. … Id.) see, e.g., Helbling v.
Cited 5 timesPublished119 N.C. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1995
In Saintsing v. Taylor, 57 N.C. … Landfall Group v. Landfall Club, Inc., 117 N.C. App. 270, 273 , 450 S.E.2d 513, 515 (1994) (quoting Valley Forge College v. Americans United, 454 U.S. 464, 488 , 70 L. Ed. 2d. 700, 719 (1982)).
Cited 3 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 2024
In Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 741, 75 L. … Brown, 460 U.S. at 742, 75 L. Ed. 2d at 514; see also Teague, 286 N.C. App. at 179, 879 S.E.2d at 896; State v. Johnson, 288 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMozingo v. Mid-South Insurance
29 N.C. App. 352 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1976
Saunders v. Warren, 267 N.C. 735, 739 , 149 S.E. 2d 19 . A recital of what the parties contend the law to be is not sufficient. Tate v. Golding, 1 N.C. App. 38 , 159 S.E. 2d 276 . See also Hawkins v. … Credit Co. v. Brown, 10 N.C. App. 382 , 178 S.E. 2d 649 . For the reasons stated, there must be a new trial. New trial. Judges Morris and Clark concur.
Cited 3 timesPublished102 N.C. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1991
V; N.C. Const, art. I, § 19. We disagree. … United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 440 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487, 496 (1989). The U.S.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna