Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.21s

  • Earl v. CGR Dev. Corp.

    242 N.C. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 2015

    Steffes v. DeLapp, 177 N.C.App. 802 , 804, 629 S.E.2d 892 , 894 (2006). See Griessel v. … V.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Federal Realty Investment Trust v. Belk-Tyler of Elizabeth City, Inc.

    56 N.C. App. 363 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1982

    We hold, therefore, that Judge Brown’s order striking the plea of waiver was error. … Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc., 288 N.C. 484 , 219 S.E. 2d 190 (1975).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Matter of Tsb

    165 N.C. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 2004

    In re Brown, 150 N.C. App. 127 , 129, 562 S.E.2d 583 , 585 (2002) (citing State v. Easterling, 300 N.C. 594 , 268 S.E.2d 800 (1980)). … Brown, 150 N.C. App. at 127 -28 , 562 S.E.2d at 583 . The facts in the case sub judice show that the disturbance created by respondent was substantial.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Highsmith

    74 N.C. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1985

    State v. Brower, 289 N.C. 644 , 224 S.E. 2d 551 (1976). Defendant “must show both that there was error in the denial of the motion and that he was prejudiced thereby before he will be granted a new trial.” State v. … Defendant sought to introduce this prior testimony through cross-examination of the victim Brown, who was not able to identify the person who testified at the probable cause hearing, only that he “heard that someone said

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of Robeson

    17 N.C. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1972

    for the purpose of encouraging and attempting to insure an adequate and continuing service of garbage collection and disposal where the board deems it to be desirable. … Hobbs v. Moore County, 267 N.C. 665 , 149 S.E. 2d 1 (1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Navarro

    247 N.C. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016

    According to the Board, therefore, surety’s motion was insufficient to toll the time for appeal of the underlying order. … See Cavenaugh v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • ESTATE OF DARBY, BY DARBY v. Monroe Oil Co., Inc.

    127 N.C. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 1997

    summary judgment, we find that the record indicates that earlier that evening, Blount on at least two occasions purchased liquor for himself and others from a store operated by the Monroe County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board … State v. Barnette, 304 N.C. 447, 458 , 284 S.E.2d 298, 305 (1981); State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E.2d 741 (1967); State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Sapatch

    108 N.C. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1992

    Elks Lodge v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 27 N.C.App. 594 , 220 S.E.2d 106 (1975), disc. review denied, 289 N.C. 296 , 222 S.E.2d 696 (1976). … Elks Lodge v. Board of Alcoholic Control at 603, 220 S.E.2d at 112 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Sanchez

    175 N.C. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2005

    Thus, under the School Board's reasoning, the notice of forfeiture would have been timely. … See Hayes v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Turner

    168 N.C. App. 152 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2005

    Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984)). “ ‘Whether evidence presented constitutes substantial evidence is a question of law for the court.’ ” State v. … In State v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Galligan v. Town of Chapel Hill

    5 N.C. App. 413 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 23, 1969

    The resolution of 25 June 1951 of the Board of Aldermen of the Town of Chapel Hill reads as follows: “Upon motion of Alderman Cornwell and seconded by Aider-man Burch, the above Resolution was introduced for passage and the … However, in the case of White v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Gertzman

    115 N.C. App. 634 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1994

    The responsibility of operating the Fund rests with a five member board. CSF Rules at 3-4. When the CSF receives a claim, it conducts an investigation and then places the claim on the agenda of the next Board meeting. … In Abbitt v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Roush v. Kennon

    188 N.C. App. 570 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2008

    We must also note that “our legislature intended the term ‘specialist’ to include a broader category of physicians than those who are board certified.” Sweatt v. Wong, 145 N.C. App. 33, 37 , 549 S.E.2d 222, 224 (2001). … See Cox v. Steffes, 161 N.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Courts v. Annie Penn Memorial Hospital, Inc.

    111 N.C. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 1993

    Knight a list of people whom she wanted to sit on the foundation’s board. … See Atkins v. Parker, 7 N.C.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Moore

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2024

    State v. Pope, 333 N.C. 106, 114 (1992). … MOORE THOMPSON, J., dissenting cords around her ankles, had handcuffs on her hands, zip ties binding her wrists to her knees, and a brown electrical cord wrapped around her neck and the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Cameron

    125 N.C. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1997

    Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 624 , 400 S.E.2d 736, 740 (1991). The Guidelines utilize the “gross income” of each parent in calculating the amount of a child support obligor’s payments thereunder. … Id.) see, e.g., Helbling v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Love v. Tyson

    119 N.C. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1995

    In Saintsing v. Taylor, 57 N.C. … Landfall Group v. Landfall Club, Inc., 117 N.C. App. 270, 273 , 450 S.E.2d 513, 515 (1994) (quoting Valley Forge College v. Americans United, 454 U.S. 464, 488 , 70 L. Ed. 2d. 700, 719 (1982)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Little

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 2024

    In Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 741, 75 L. … Brown, 460 U.S. at 742, 75 L. Ed. 2d at 514; see also Teague, 286 N.C. App. at 179, 879 S.E.2d at 896; State v. Johnson, 288 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mozingo v. Mid-South Insurance

    29 N.C. App. 352 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1976

    Saunders v. Warren, 267 N.C. 735, 739 , 149 S.E. 2d 19 . A recital of what the parties contend the law to be is not sufficient. Tate v. Golding, 1 N.C. App. 38 , 159 S.E. 2d 276 . See also Hawkins v. … Credit Co. v. Brown, 10 N.C. App. 382 , 178 S.E. 2d 649 . For the reasons stated, there must be a new trial. New trial. Judges Morris and Clark concur.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Cobb

    102 N.C. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1991

    V; N.C. Const, art. I, § 19. We disagree. … United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 440 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487, 496 (1989). The U.S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.