Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

0.47s

  • State v. Miranda

    235 N.C. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2014

    Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 168, 97 S. Ct. 2221, 2226, 53 L. Ed. 2d 187, 196 (1977). … See Brown, 64 N.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Raritan River Steel Co. v. CHERRY, BEKAERT

    339 S.E.2d 62 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1986

    Warfford; Wit Brown; Louis Eddie Dutton; William Lanier, Jr.; David Whaley; T. Ernest Sievelkorn; James Laney; Harold B. Henderson; Albry Shaw; J. … Warfford; Wit Brown; Louis Eddie Dutton; William Lanier, Jr.; David Whaley; T. Ernest Sievelkorn; James Laney; Harold B. Henderson; Albry Shaw; J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sidbury v. Jacobs

    167 N.C. App. 655 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2004

    Chappell v. Donnelly, 113 N.C. App. 626 , 629, 439 S.E.2d 802 , 805 (1994) (citing Heath v. Turner, 309 N.C. 483 , 488, 308 S.E.2d 244 , 247 (1983)). … Locklear v. Oxendine, 233 N.C. 710 , 715, 65 S.E.2d 673 , 677 (1951); Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Meyers v. SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA

    21 N.C. App. 202 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1974

    Paragraph 3 provided: “The price of the Stock shall be determined jointly by the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Trion semiannually at the meeting of said Board next following September 1 and April 1 of each year … Peaseley v. Coke Co., 282 N.C. 585 , 194 S.E. 2d 133 (1973); State v. Cook, 263 N.C. 730 , 140 S.E. 2d 305 (1965); Construction Co. v. Crain and Denbo, Inc., 256 N.C. 110 , 123 S.E. 2d 590 (1962).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ESTATE OF DARBY, BY DARBY v. Monroe Oil Co., Inc.

    127 N.C. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 19, 1997

    summary judgment, we find that the record indicates that earlier that evening, Blount on at least two occasions purchased liquor for himself and others from a store operated by the Monroe County Alcoholic Beverage Control Board … State v. Barnette, 304 N.C. 447, 458 , 284 S.E.2d 298, 305 (1981); State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25 , 153 S.E.2d 741 (1967); State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Smith

    246 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 1, 2016

    Wilson pulled off to the side 1 Another sign near the pony rides sign and visible from the highway was labeled “Double ‘S’ Ranch” and advertised “Riding Lessons, Lead-Line Rides and Temp[orary] Boarding … See Bainter v. State, 135 So.3d 517, 519 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (license revoked by presence of six foot chain link gate within barbed wire fence, accompanied by “No Trespassing” signs); Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Beavers v. McMican

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2022

    Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377, 380-81, 477 S.E.2d 234, 237 (1996) (emphasis in original). … Brown, 124 N.C. App. at BEAVERS V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Meeks v. Atkeson

    7 N.C. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1970

    (now C.J.), speaking for the Court in Brown v. … Stacy, C.J., in Tyson v. Ford, 228 N.C. 778, 781 , 47 S.E. 2d 251 . As stated by Seawell, J., in Cole v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Blount v. Taft

    29 N.C. App. 626 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1976

    In Wilson v. McClenny, 262 N.C. 121 , 136 S.E. 2d 569 (1964), and Stein v. … Those parts of the Business Corporation Act dealing with by-laws and their amendment, primarily G.S. 55-16, G.S. 55-66, and G.S. 55-28 (d), provide for the amendment of by-laws by a majority of the board of directors then

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Better Business Forms, Inc. v. Davis

    120 N.C. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1995

    Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. App. 281, 285 , 350 S.E.2d 111, 114 (1986). Neither defendant in his brief appears to contest that North Carolina’s long-arm statute, N.C. Gen. … Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp., 318 N.C. 361, 365 , 348 S.E.2d 782, 786 (1986) (citing Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 , 2 L. Ed. 2d. 1283, 1298 (1958)).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Kanellos v. Kanellos

    251 N.C. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 20, 2016

    KANELLOS V. … Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420, 423-24, 524 S.E.2d 95, 98 (2000) (citations, internal quotation marks, some ellipses, and some brackets omitted).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. TAYLOR KING FURNITURE

    189 N.C. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 1, 2008

    Anthony DeFranzo, who is board certified in plastic and reconstructive surgery and in general hand surgery. On 5 June 2003, Dr. … Deese v. Champion Int'l Corp., 352 N.C. 109, 116 , 530 S.E.2d 549, 553 (2000). The Commission is the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses and of the weight of the evidence. Watkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Home Products Corp. v. Howell's Motor Freight, Inc.

    46 N.C. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 1980

    Stores, Inc. v. Brinke, *279 450 F. 2d 1223 (5th Cir. 1971); Bennett v. R.R., 232 N.C. 144 , 59 S.E. 2d 598 (1950). … U.S. v. Mississippi Val. Barge Line Co., 285 F. 2d 381 (8th Cir. 1960); Brown v. Express Co., 192 N.C. 25 , 133 S.E. 414 (1926). In Deal v. Motor Express Corp., 4 N.C.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Long v. Long

    71 N.C. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1984

    Suit for divorce from bed and board is not exclusively a means for collection of alimony, but also a means of establishing a certain legal relationship. See Schlagel v. … Although alimony may be the true subject of controversy, the statutory provisions allowing suit for alimony are permissive, not mandatory; a party suing for divorce from bed and board may, but is not required to, apply for

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bicket v. McLean Securities, Inc.

    138 N.C. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2000

    See Hofler v. Hill and Hofler v. Hill, 311 N.C. 325, 329 , 317 S.E.2d 670, 673 (1984) (holding conclusion of law fully reviewable on appeal and may be reversed if erroneous); Prime South Homes v. Byrd, 102 N.C. … Approval of Board of Directors Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in deleting the entire second paragraph of the 1994 Declaratory Judgment titled “Approval of Board of Directors.”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Franklin County v. Burdick

    103 N.C. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 1991

    Brown v. Lanier, 60 N.C. App. 575, 577 , 299 S.E.2d 279, 281 (1983). Furthermore, plaintiff did inquire of Mr. Burdick at trial as to why he waited so many years to assert the unconstitutionality of the amendment. … In Taylor v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re the Application & Claim of Walsh

    79 N.C. App. 611 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1986

    Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E. 2d 379, 383 , rehearing denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E. 2d 106 (1980); Cannon v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Wilmington, 65 N.C. … See e.g., Wagoner v. Gainer, 279 S.E. 2d 636 (W.Va. 1981); Blackwell v. Quarterly County Court, 622 S.W. 2d 535 (Tenn. 1981); Public Employees’ Retirement Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Gilbert

    264 N.C. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2019

    As president, Defendant's duties were to "preside at all meetings of the general membership and the board of directors at which [he] may be present," "coordinate the work of officers, the board and the committees of this … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chur v. Keckeley

    17 S.C.L. 479 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1830

    See Jones v. Brooke, 4 Taunt. 464, Riddle v. Moss, 7 Cranch, 206 , Hubbly v. Brown and Nichols, 16 Johns. 70 , 3 M‘C. 78, note.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brinkley

    22 N.C. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 1974

    Our Supreme Court has held to the contrary in State v. Thornton, 283 N.C. 513 , 196 S.E. 2d 701 , and State v. … motions to strike, concerning their observations of certain other “small glassine bags with white powder,” similar to the two bags, which were purchased from defendant, which they saw at the time of the purchase in a small brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.