Case law

In re the Appeal of Becky King Properties, LLC

234 N.C. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2014

Corp. v. Cty. of Durham, 143 N.C. … See Johnson v. Lucas, 168 N.C.

Washington Housing Authority v. North Carolina Housing Authorities Risk Retention Pool

130 N.C. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 1998

Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless Ins. Co., 72 N.C. … See National Mutual Insurance Company v. McMahon & Sons, Inc., 177 W.Va. 734 , 356 S.E.2d 488 (1987); Interstate Fire and Casualty Co. v.

In re: C.J.S.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2024

State v. Radomski, __ N.C. App. __, 901 S.E.2d 908, 915, disc. rev. denied, 386 N.C. 557 (2024) (cleaned up). 1. … App. at 549 (quoting State v. Taylor, 379 N.C. 589, 605 (2021)) (emphasis added).

Mathis v. Dowling

230 N.C. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 2013

That same day, the Board of Directors for the Council voted to terminate her employment. … Gupton v. Son-Lan Dev. Co., 205 N.C.

Braswell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital

106 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1992

Forrest v. Pitt County Board of Education, 100 N.C.App. 119 , 394 S.E.2d 659 (1990), aff’d, 328 N.C. 327 , 401 S.E.2d 366 (1991). … In Forrest v. Pitt County Board of Education, supra, plaintiff was employed as a cafeteria manager when she fell and injured her back in the cafeteria freezer at one of defendant’s public schools.

State v. Dietriech

165 N.C. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2004

Elizabeth Toth ran an equine boarding and training facility located one and one-half miles from defendant's residence on Pony Farm Road. … State v. Olson, 330 N.C. 557 , 564, 411 S.E.2d 592 , 595 (1992). The court must find that there is substantial evidence of each element of the crime charged and of defendant's perpetration of such crime. Id.

Osborne v. Redwood Mountain

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2022

COA21-515 Filed 5 April 2022 Wilkes County, No. 19 CVS 184 BROWN OSBORNE and wife JENNIFER OSBORNE, Plaintiffs, v. … OSBORNE V.

State v. Dean

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 2025

The defense offered the testimony of an expert witness, Edward Brown, a Doctor of Philosophy in chemistry. Dr. … Brown noted, neither the color test nor the FTIR test “differentiate between the D isomer and L isomer.” -3-  STATE V.

Carolinas Medical Center v. Employers & Carriers Listed in Exhibit A

172 N.C. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2005

Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp., 315 N.C. 127, 137 , 337 S.E.2d 477, 483 (1985). It is a “well-settled rule that a statute’s constitutionality shall be determined by the judiciary, not an administrative board.” Meads v. … Woodard v.

Clontz v. Clontz

44 N.C. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1980

Beacon Homes, Inc. v. Holt, 266 N.C. 467 , 146 S.E. 2d 434 (1966); Board of Commissioners v. Bumpass, 237 N.C. 143 , 74 S.E. 2d 436 (1953). It is clear that plaintiff has no right to recover under this statute. … In Brokers, Inc. v. Board of Education, 33 N.C.

State v. Harper

72 N.C. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1985

We believe the testimony of the defendant’s niece and his sister that they saw him beating the child with a board, and the testimony of Dr. … See State v. Wilkerson, 295 N.C. 559 , 247 S.E. 2d 905 (1978). The defendant, relying on State v. Byrd, 309 N.C. 132 , 305 S.E. 2d 724 (1983), also argues that there is no evidence that he struck the child in the head.

North Carolina Department of Correction v. Gibson

58 N.C. App. 241 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 20, 1982

of the Board’s evidence. … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977). By definition, then, the whole record test is generally used in cases in which there is conflicting or contradictory evidence.

Schumacher v. Schumacher

109 N.C. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1993

Brown, District Court Judge presiding at the August 27-28,1991 Buncombe County District Court *311 #3 Civil Session, a motion term, pursuant to plaintiffs motion for modification of child support. . . … See Stroupe v. Stroupe, 301 N.C. 656 , 273 S.E.2d 434 (1981). Vacated and remanded. Judges WELLS and EAGLES concur.

FIRST AMERICAN FED. SAV. & LOAN v. Royall

334 S.E.2d 792 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 1, 1985

Brown & Campbell by C.K. Brown, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellants. BECTON, Judge. … Gerdes v. Shew, 4 N.C.App. 144, 148 , 166 S.E.2d 519, 522 (1969) (citation omitted); accord Abernathy v.

State ex rel. Lanier v. Vines

1 N.C. App. 208 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1968

power, since the statute prescribed no standards to guide the administrative Board in granting or withholding the prescribed license); State v. … Board of Education, 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 .

State v. Navarro

247 N.C. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2016

According to the Board, therefore, surety’s motion was insufficient to toll the time for appeal of the underlying order. … See Cavenaugh v.

Stroud v. North Carolina Memorial Hospital

15 N.C. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1972

Bailey v. Dept. of Mental Health, supra. … See Crawford v. Board of Education, 3 N.C. App. 343 , 164 S.E. 2d 748 (1968), aff’d 275 N.C. 354 (1969).

State v. Williams

71 N.C. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

The evidence at trial showed that the marijuana in question was packaged in seventeen separate, small brown envelopes known in street terminology as “nickel or dime bags.” … State v. Baxter, 285 N.C. 735 , 208 S.E. 2d 696 (1974); see also State v. Casey, 59 N.C. App. 99 , 296 S.E. 2d 473 (1982).

Bolton Corp. v. State

95 N.C. App. 596 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1989

Johnson v. Wall, 38 N.C. App. 406, 410 , 248 S.E.2d 571, 573-4 (1978). However, a mere incidental beneficiary to a contract acquires no right against the promisor or the promisee. Matterness v. … In construing this provision, our Supreme Court in Davidson and Jones, Inc. v. N.C.

In Re Gertzman

115 N.C. App. 634 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 1994

The responsibility of operating the Fund rests with a five member board. CSF Rules at 3-4. When the CSF receives a claim, it conducts an investigation and then places the claim on the agenda of the next Board meeting. … In Abbitt v.