Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.61s

  • Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Hollywood

    65 N.C. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1983

    See also Farmers Bank v. Michael T. … Coble v. Coble, 300 N.C. 708 , 268 S.E. 2d 185 (1980).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Erickson v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Safety

    264 N.C. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2019

    Brown v. City of Winston-Salem, 171 N.C. App. 266, 269, 614 S.E.2d 599, 601 (2005) (quotation marks and brackets omitted). … . __, __, 817 S.E.2d 257, 260 (2018) (quoting Brown v. N.C. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, __ N.C. App.__, __, 808 S.E.2d 322, 324 (2017)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Talton

    112 N.C. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1993

    Meacham v. Board of Educ., 59 N.C. App. 381 , 297 S.E.2d 192 (1982), disc review denied, 307 N.C. 577 , 299 S.E.2d 651 (1983). Estoppel principles depend on the facts of each case. Mayer v. Mayer, 66 N.C. … Meacham v. Board of Educ., 47 N.C. App. 271 , 267 S.E.2d 349 (1980), appeal after remand, 59 N.C.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Clontz v. Clontz

    44 N.C. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1980

    Beacon Homes, Inc. v. Holt, 266 N.C. 467 , 146 S.E. 2d 434 (1966); Board of Commissioners v. Bumpass, 237 N.C. 143 , 74 S.E. 2d 436 (1953). It is clear that plaintiff has no right to recover under this statute. … In Brokers, Inc. v. Board of Education, 33 N.C.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Henry v. Southeastern Ob-Gyn Associates, P.A.

    145 N.C. App. 208 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001

    See Tucker v. … See Baynor v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Chappell

    165 N.C. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 2004

    Defendant then forced his way into the house and began swinging a 2×4 board. Defendant knocked the phone away from Ms. Chappell before she could call 911. Defendant swung the board "like a baseball bat" and struck Ms. … State v. Odom, 307 N.C. 655 , 660, 300 S.E.2d 375 , 378 (1983)(quoting United States v. McCaskill, 676 F.2d 995 , 1002 (4th Cir. 1982)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Lee v. Williams

    55 N.C. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1981

    Craven v. Dimmette, 8 N.C. App. 75 , 173 S.E. 2d 647 (1970); see Abernethy v. Trust Co., 211 N.C. 450 , 190 S.E. 735 (1937). … Snow v. Board of Architecture, 273 N.C. 559, 570-571 , 160 S.E. 2d 719, 727 (1968). Judicial review of the Secretary’s decision in the suit for enforcement of that decision, therefore, was improper.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Arrington

    215 N.C. App. 161 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2011

    State v. Brown, 110 N.C. App. 658, 659 , 430 S.E.2d 433, 434 (1993) (quotations and citation omitted). … State v. Brown, 110 N.C. App. at 659 , 430 S.E.2d at 434 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.

    54 N.C. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981

    Peele v. Powell, 156 N.C. 553 , 73 S.E. 234 (1911). … Goldsmith v. Erwin, 183 F. 2d 432 (4th Cir. 1950).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.

    100 N.C. App. 367 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1990

    This view of equitable estoppel was recently applied in Meachum v. Board of Education, 59 N.C. App. 381 , 297 S.E.2d 192 (1982), disc. rev. denied, 307 N.C. 577 , 299 S.E.2d 651 (1983). In Meachum v. … Board of Education, plaintiff schoolteacher experienced severe medical problems which interfered with her teaching.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Chilton v. Bowman Gray School of Medicine

    45 N.C. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1980

    Several employees and the manager of the furniture company boarded a company truck one Saturday evening, drove to Morehead City, and camped in the truck for the night. … In Barber v. Minges, 223 N.C. 213 , 25 S.E. 2d 837 (1943), employee was injured while on a fishing trip.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Dollar v. Town of Cary

    153 N.C. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 1, 2002

    See Dennis v. Raleigh, 253 N.C. 400, 405 , 116 S.E.2d 923, 927 (I960) (city is permitted to advertise its advantages); see also Bardolph v. Arnold, 112 N.C. … Bd. of Educ., 98 A.2d 673 (N.J. 1953) (board of education was not permitted to fund advertising promoting voting for school bonds).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bamberger v. Bernholz

    96 N.C. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1989

    Rorrer v. … Vail v. Vail, 233 N.C. 109, 113 , 63 S.E.2d 202, 205 (1951).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Hensley

    91 N.C. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1988

    State v. Brown, 312 N.C. 237 , 321 S.E. 2d 856 (1984); State v. Harvey, 281 N.C. 1 , 187 S.E. 2d 706 (1972). … See G.S. 14-27.5; State v. Barnette, 304 N.C. 447 , 284 S.E. 2d 298 (1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Town of Ayden v. Town of Winterville

    143 N.C. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2001

    . § 160A-31 provides in pertinent part: *138 (a) The governing board of any municipality may annex by ordinance any area contiguous to its boundaries upon presentation to the governing board of a petition signed by the owners … See also City of Raleigh v. R.R.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Exec. Off. Park of Durham Ass'n

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 18, 2021

    The Declaration required unit owners be subject to assessments ordered by the Board of Directors. … Petitioner’s board did not authorize an addendum invoking the North Carolina Condominium Act to permit such a procedure. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 47C-1-102(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of Pinebluff v. Marts

    195 N.C. App. 659 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2009

    Wilkins v. Safran, 185 N.C. … .”); Forsyth County v. York, 19 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Flores v. Stacy Penny Masonry Co.

    134 N.C. App. 452 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 1999

    v. … The requirements of section 97-88 are satisfied, and in our discretion, see Brown, 122 N.C. App. at 477 , 470 S.E.2d at 354 , we grant plaintiff’s request.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Dean

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 19, 2025

    The defense offered the testimony of an expert witness, Edward Brown, a Doctor of Philosophy in chemistry. Dr. … Brown noted, neither the color test nor the FTIR test “differentiate between the D isomer and L isomer.” -3- STATE V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Becker

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 2, 2021

    ALEXANDER V. … ALEXANDER V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.