Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

1.06s

  • State v. Thompson

    49 N.C. App. 690 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1980

    State v. Lawrence, 262 N.C. 162, 163 , 136 S.E. 2d 595, 596-97 (1964); see also State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 41, 47 , 265 S.E. 2d 191, 195 (1980). The crime of common law robbery includes an assault on the person. State v. … See State v. Joyner, 297 N.C. 349, 359-62 , 255 S.E. 2d 390, 396-98 (1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue

    126 N.C. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1997

    Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. … Brooks v. Ansco & Associates, 114 N.C. App. 711, 716 , 443 S.E.2d 89, 92 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McKenzie v. McKenzie

    75 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 1985

    McKENZIE v. Owen Ray McKENZIE. No. 8415DC999. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 4, 1985. Daniel H. Monroe and Latham and Wood by James F. … . *271 Vernon, Vernon, Wooten, Brown & Andrews, P.A. by Wiley P. Wooten and T. Randall Sandifer, Burlington, for defendant. JOHNSON, Judge.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Schroeder v. The Oak Grove Farm Homeowners Ass'n

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 2024

    Frye acknowledged the Board had considered various animals other than - 15 - SCHROEDER V. … Q: And so does the Board have any indication that Mary - 20 - SCHROEDER V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Haarhuis v. Cheek

    255 N.C. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 2017

    Brown v. Moore, 286 N.C. 664, 674, 213 S.E.2d 342, 349 (1975). … Brown, 286 N.C. at 673, 213 S.E.2d at 348-49. Therefore, “the assessment of damages - 16 - HAARHUIS ESTATE V.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re: House

    256 N.C. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 2017

    There is no record evidence that the Eugenics Board was ever informed of Claimant’s involuntary sterilization, nor that it was consulted in the matter in any way. … Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942)[,]” this singular statement does not constitute an argument that this Court can address.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Marshall v. Miller

    47 N.C. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1980

    For their second claim for relief, each of the plaintiffs, Stewart, Brown, Howell, and Bell, alleged in their original complaint that after the defendants had sold to each of them a mobile home, including the undercarriage … F.T.C., 540 F. 2d 287 (7th Cir. 1976); Koch v. Federal Trade Commission, 206 F. 2d 311 (6th Cir. 1953); D.D.D. Corporation v.

    Modified on other grounds by Marshall v. Miller, 302 N.C. 539 (1981)Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Barr

    198 N.C. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2009

    Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420, 423 , 524 S.E.2d 95, 97 (2000) (citing Falls v. Falls, 52 N.C. App. 203, 209 , 278 S.E.2d 546, 551 , disc. rev. denied, 304 N.C. 390 , 285 S.E.2d 831 (1981)). … "[T]he trial court's conclusions of law are reviewable de novo. " Browning, 136 N.C. App. at 423 , 524 S.E.2d at 98 (citing Wright v. Auto Sales, Inc., 72 N.C. App. 449 , 325 S.E.2d 493 (1985)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Riggs

    100 N.C. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 21, 1990

    Witherspoon, 293 N.C. 321, 326 , 237 S.E.2d 822, 826 (1977) (citations omitted); State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). … E.g., State v. Cronin, 299 N.C. 229, 243 , 262 S.E.2d 277, 286 (1980).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jessee v. Jessee

    212 N.C. App. 426 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2011

    Vernon, Vernon, Wooten, Brown, Andrews & Garrett, P.A., Burlington, by Benjamin D. Overby, for defendant-appellants. ERVIN, Judge. Defendants Christine Jessee; Sandra L. … Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In Re the Will of Johnston

    157 N.C. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 15, 2003

    See Stevenson v. Joyner, 148 N.C. … App. at 401-02 , 429 S.E.2d at 762 (dismissing as interlocutory an appeal from the denial of a motion to compel); Brown v. Brown, 77 N.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Gayton-Barbosa

    197 N.C. App. 129 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 2009

    The general supervisory authority under which the Supreme Court acted in Brown is currently embodied in N.C.R. App. P. … State v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Semelka v. The Univ. of NC

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2020

    See West v. G.D. Reddick, Inc., 48 N.C. … [The decision of the board of trustees] shall be final except that the faculty member may[] . . . file a written notice of appeal[] . . . with the Board of Governors if the faculty member

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Maney

    151 N.C. App. 486 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 2002

    State v. Davidson, 77 N.C. App. 540, 546 , 335 S.E.2d 518, 522 (1985) (quoting Golden v. Newsome, 755 *490 F.2d 1478, 1484 (11th Cir. 1985)). … State v. Boyd, 321 N.C. 574, 577 , 364 S.E.2d 118, 119 (1988). Whether or not to exclude evidence under Rule 403 is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial judge. State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Childress v. Trion, Inc.

    125 N.C. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1997

    Taylor v. J.P. Stevens & Co., 307 N.C. 392 , 298 S.E.2d 681 (1983). In a recent decision of this Court, Brown v. Public Works Commission, 122 N.C. … In Powe v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In re Dismissal Proceedings Against Huang

    110 N.C. App. 683 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 6, 1993

    Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Savings & Loan Commn., 43 N.C. App. 493 , 259 S.E.2d 373 (1979); Henderson v. N. C. Dept. of Human Resources, 91 N.C. App. 527 , 372 S.E.2d 887 (1988). … Kowtoniuk v. Quarles, 528 F.2d 1161, 1165 (4th Cir. 1975).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Antioch United Holy Church, Inc.

    214 N.C. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 16, 2011

    As stated by our Supreme Court in Atkins v. … Inc. v. Edwards, 195 N.C. App. 55, 61 , 671 S.E.2d 23, 27 (2009) (quoting Page v. Roscoe, LLC, 128 N.C. App. 678, 681-82 , 497 S.E.2d 422, 425 (1998)).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Baltzell v. Dowdy

    202 N.C. App. 147 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 2010

    Forbis v. Neal, 361 N.C. 519, 524 , 649 S.E.2d 382, 385 (2007). … Board of Education, 251 N.C. 699, 701 , 111 S.E.2d 910, 912 (1960); Ingram v. Kerr, 120 N.C. App. 493, 495-96 , 462 S.E.2d 698, 700 (1995); Mullins v. Friend, 116 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Smyre

    242 N.C. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2015

    overalls, a black hat, brown jacket and long johns." … In any event, we note that even if Smyre had properly argued plain error, our prior decision in State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Danaher v. Joffe

    184 N.C. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 17, 2007

    Hobby & Son, Inc. v. … Similarly, in Albert v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.