Case law

Williford v. Williford

26 N.C. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 1975

In support thereof, plaintiff cites Avery v. Brantley, 191 N.C. 396 , 131 S.E. 721 (1926). In Avery v. … Bowen v. Rental Co., 283 N.C. 395 , 196 S.E. 2d 789 (1973). However, the distribution of whatever recovery is obtained is governed by the provisions of G.S. 28-173. Brown v. Moore, 286 N.C. 664 , 213 S.E. 2d 342 (1975).

State v. Hall

165 N.C. App. 658 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2004

State v. Allen, 317 N.C. 119, 124-25 , 343 S.E.2d 893, 897 (1986); see also State v. Joyner, 295 N.C. 55 , 243 S.E.2d 367 (1978). … In State v. Westall, 116 N.C.

Frazier v. Town of Blowing Rock

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2022

If the board’s decision is challenged as resting on an error of law, the proper standard of review for the superior court is de novo. Bailey & Assocs., Inc. v. Wilmington Bd. of Adjustment, 202 N.C. … The authority of a local board of adjustment to render decisions as a quasi-judicial body  FRAZIER V.

State v. Whitehead

42 N.C. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 1979

See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed. 2d 416 (1975). … See Brown v. Illinois, supra. Likewise, we need not address the challenge to the consensual search of defendant’s automobile after the arrest.

State v. Muncy

79 N.C. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 1986

In State v. … State v. Cumber, 280 N.C. 127 , 185 S.E. 2d 141 (1971); State v. Jones, 242 N.C. 563 , 89 S.E. 2d 129 (1955).

Town of Highlands v. Edwards

144 N.C. App. 363 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 2001

Rowe v. Durham, 235 N.C. 158, 161 , 69 S.E.2d 171, 173 (1952). … Cavin v. Ostwalt, 76 N.C. App. 309, 312 , 332 S.E.2d 509, 511 (1985); Rowe v. Durham, 235 N.C. 158, 160 , 69 S.E.2d 171, 172 (1952).

Proctor v. LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

196 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2009

CLAYTON LEE PROCTOR, JR., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. … Plaintiff relies on Faulkenbury v. Teachers' and State Employees' Ret. Sys., 345 N.C. 683 , 483 S.E.2d 422 (1997) and Bailey v.

Oliver v. COUNTY OF LENOIR

198 N.C. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 2009

OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. … Administrative review begins in the County Board of Equalization and Review. The County Board has jurisdiction to hear any taxpayer who has a complaint as to the listing or appraisal of his or others' property.

McClennahan v. North Carolina School of the Arts

177 N.C. App. 806 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2006

Plaintiff appealed Dean Pollock’s decision not to renew his contract to the N.C.S.A.’s Board of Trustees and Board of Governors (“Governors”) and on 9 November 2001 the Governors affirmed Dean Pollock’s decision. … App. 150, 156 , 614 S.E.2d 385, 389 (2005) (quoting Price v. Davis, 132 N.C. App. 556, 558-59 , 512 S.E.2d 783, 785 (1999)). Defendants cite Corum v.

State v. Hosch

202 N.C. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 2010

Earwood pulled up behind the man running on Highway 74 and stopped him; he was wearing a brown jogging outfit. After frisking the man in the brown jogging suit, Sgt. … See State v.

Horne v. City of Charlotte

41 N.C. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1979

Board of Transportation, 292 N.C. 437 , 233 S.E. 2d 569 (1977), the Court recognized the principle that a contractor employed by the Board of Transportation for the performance of work in connection with the construction … The remedy is against the Board of Transportation for “inverse condemnation”. Similarly, in Highway Commission v.

Firley v. Town of Marshall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2026

FIRLEY V. … Plaintiffs offered as an expert witness Jeffrey Brown, a consultant engineer who performed their survey work for the case.

Stanley v. RETIREMENT & HEALTH BEN., ETC.

286 S.E.2d 643 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1982

Bridges v. Charlotte, 221 N.C. 472, 477 , 20 S.E.2d 825, 829 (1942). Accord, Powell v. State Retirement System, 3 N.C. App. 39 , 164 S.E.2d 80 (1968). … We are further persuaded by the reasoning in Meachan v. Board of Education, 47 N.C.App. 271 , 267 S.E.2d 349 (1980).

Southern Railway Co. v. O'Boyle Tank Lines, Inc.

70 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 21, 1984

Brown v. Ry. Co. and Phillips v. Ry. Co., 276 N.C. 398 , 172 S.E. 2d 502 (1970); Owens v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co., 258 N.C. 92 , 128 S.E. 2d 4 (1962). … Brown v. Ry. Co. and Phillips v. Ry. Co., supra.

Hospital Group of Western North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

76 N.C. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 1985

As stated in Insurance Co. v. … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977).

City of Charlotte, Corp. v. Univ. Fin. Props., LLC

246 N.C. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2016

Bd. of Transp. v. Brown, 34 N.C. App. 266, 268, 237 S.E.2d 854, 855 (1977), aff’d per curiam, 296 N.C. 250, 249 S.E.2d 803 (1978). … In Bryant, the Board of Transportation condemned a portion of the defendants’ land in order to make improvements to Interstate 40. Id. at 257, 296 S.E.2d at 815.

Carter v. Stanly County

123 N.C. App. 235 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 16, 1996

Meyer v. Walls, 122 N.C.App. 507, 513-14 , 471 S.E.2d 422, 427 , (1996). A. … Stanly County, County Commissioners and Board of Health Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that the “County and its Board of Health [and County Commissioners] are liable under the doctrines of principal and agent and respondeat

Beauchesne v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

125 N.C. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1997

Brown, Raleigh, for Respondent. JOHN, Judge. … Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977).

Jubilee Carolina

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2019

“The [superior] court, reviewing the decision of a town board on a conditional use permit application, sits in the posture of an -4-  JUBILEE CAROLINA, LLC V. … The [superior] court does not review the sufficiency of evidence presented to it but reviews that evidence presented to the town board.” Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v.

Ruff v. Parex, Inc.

131 N.C. App. 534 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1998

Robinson v. General Mills Restaurants, 110 N.C.