Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersncctapp

9,157 results

3.35s

  • Blackwell v. Granville County Department of Social Services

    39 N.C. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 16, 1979

    G.S. 150A-5K5); Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). … See G.S. 150A-43, Insurance Co. v. Ingram, 34 N.C. App. 619 , 240 S.E. 2d 460 (1977); see also Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 (1963).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McClennahan v. North Carolina School of the Arts

    177 N.C. App. 806 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2006

    Plaintiff appealed Dean Pollock’s decision not to renew his contract to the N.C.S.A.’s Board of Trustees and Board of Governors (“Governors”) and on 9 November 2001 the Governors affirmed Dean Pollock’s decision. … App. 150, 156 , 614 S.E.2d 385, 389 (2005) (quoting Price v. Davis, 132 N.C. App. 556, 558-59 , 512 S.E.2d 783, 785 (1999)). Defendants cite Corum v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Frady

    175 N.C. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 3, 2006

    Specifically, defendant relies on Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506 , 82 S.Ct. 884 , 8 L.Ed.2d 70 (1962) and State v. … State v. Brown, 87 N.C.App. 13 , 22, 359 S.E.2d 265 , 270 (1987). Our courts have previously upheld and applied this delegation of the burden of proof upon a defendant. State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oliver v. COUNTY OF LENOIR

    198 N.C. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 4, 2009

    OLIVER, Plaintiff, v. … Administrative review begins in the County Board of Equalization and Review. The County Board has jurisdiction to hear any taxpayer who has a complaint as to the listing or appraisal of his or others' property.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Johnson

    38 N.C. App. 111 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1978

    On 2 August 1977 Judge Browning allowed defendant additional time until 28 September 1977 to serve his proposed record on appeal. … Ledwell v. County of Randolph, 31 N.C. App. 522 , 229 S.E. 2d 836 (1976). The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'& STATE EMP. RET.

    510 S.E.2d 675 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1999

    FAULKENBURY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. … Vinson & Elkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Foreclosure of Sutton Investments, Inc.

    46 N.C. App. 654 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 20, 1980

    Brown v. Jennings, 188 N.C. 155 , 124 S.E. 150 (1924); Ferebee v. Sawyer, 167 N.C. 199 , 83 S.E. 17 (1914). Such powers of sale are contractual, Eubanks v. … Yates v. Brown, 275 N.C. 634, 640 , 170 S.E. 2d 477, 482 (1969).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • May v. Shuford Mills, Inc.

    64 N.C. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 4, 1983

    In Payne v. Cone Mills Corp., 60 N.C. … In Dowdy v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Simpson

    230 N.C. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2013

    State v. Smith, 186 N.C. App. 57, 62 , 650 S.E.2d 29, 33 (2007). … State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 568 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 588 (1984). When the activity is “preparation” or “compounding,” Brown indicates that the offense of manufacturing requires an intent to distribute.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Springdale Estates Ass'n

    46 N.C. App. 488 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

    Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977); Boehm v. Board of Podiatry Examiners, 41 N.C. App. 567 , 255 S.E. 2d 328 , cert. denied, 298 N.C. 294 , 259 S.E. 2d 298 (1979). … Thompson v. Board of Education, supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Mussallam v. Mussallam

    83 N.C. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1986

    Jolly v. Wright, 300 N.C. 83, 92 , 265 S.E. 2d 135, 142 (1980). … See Elmwood v. Elmwood, 295 N.C. 168 , 244 S.E. 2d 668 (1978); Wolfe v. Wolfe, 64 N.C. App. 249 , 307 S.E. 2d 400 (1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fulton v. East Carolina Trucks, Inc.

    88 N.C. App. 274 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1987

    McKelvey v. AT&T Technologies, Inc., 789 F. 2d 1518, 1520 (11th Cir. 1986); accord Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. v. Allied Artist Pictures Corp., 602 F. 2d 1062 (2d Cir. 1979); Gaspard v. … See, e.g., Hammer v. Allison, 20 N.C. App. 623 , 202 S.E. 2d 307 , cert. denied, 285 N.C. 233 , 204 S.E. 2d 23 (1974); First Citizens Bank v. Powell, 58 N.C. App. 229 , 292 S.E. 2d 731 (1982); Hayes v. Browne, 76 N.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

    86 N.C. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 16, 1987

    Long v. Asphalt Paving Co., 47 N.C. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Food Products *134 Corp. v. Industrial Comm., 129 Ariz. 208 , 630 P. 2d 31 (1981); Big “2” Engine Rebuilders v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jubilee Carolina

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 2019

    “The [superior] court, reviewing the decision of a town board on a conditional use permit application, sits in the posture of an -4- JUBILEE CAROLINA, LLC V. … The [superior] court does not review the sufficiency of evidence presented to it but reviews that evidence presented to the town board.” Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Lanier Marine Liquidators, Inc.

    187 N.C. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2007

    This Court in Cameron-Brown Co. v. Daves, 83 N.C. … See Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. Brown, 99 N.C. App. 626, 635 , 394 S.E.2d 651, 657 (1990) (“Litigation on interstate business transactions inevitably involves inconvenience to one of the parties.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hastings for Pratt v. Seegars Fence Co.

    128 N.C. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1997

    Plaintiff subsequently submitted to a voluntary dismissal of her claims against the Pitt County School Board. … App. 161, 164 , 374 S.E.2d 160, 163 (1988) (quoting Smithwick v. Crutchfield, 87 N.C. App. 374 , 361 S.E.2d 111 (1987)); Asheville Contracting Co. v. City of Wilson, 62 N.C. App. 329 , 303 S.E.2d 365 (1983); Biddix v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. McBride

    15 N.C. App. 742 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 23, 1972

    State v. Sailor, 240 N.C. 113 , 81 S.E. 2d 191 (1954). … State v. Brown, 13 N.C. App. 280 , 185 S.E. 2d 486 (1971).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Frazier v. Town of Blowing Rock

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 2022

    If the board’s decision is challenged as resting on an error of law, the proper standard of review for the superior court is de novo. Bailey & Assocs., Inc. v. Wilmington Bd. of Adjustment, 202 N.C. … The authority of a local board of adjustment to render decisions as a quasi-judicial body FRAZIER V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McClendon v. Clinard

    37 N.C. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 17, 1978

    App. 353 Theodore McCLENDON and Rachel McClendon v. David Elwood CLINARD, Jr., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. George CARDWELL, d/b/a Cardwell Electric Company. No. 7721DC1008. … Bank v. Gillespie, supra, at 311 , 230 S.E.2d at 380 . This case is distinguishable from Bank v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Edmisten, Attorney General v. Challenge, Inc.

    54 N.C. App. 513 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1981

    Pruitt v. Williams, supra; Realty Corp. v. Kalman, 272 N.C. 201 , 159 S.E. 2d 193 (1967); Huskins v. Hospital, 238 N.C. 357 , 78 S.E. 2d 116 (1953); 7 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d Injunctions § 12.1 (1977). … Henderson v. Burd, 133 F. 2d 515 (2d Cir. 1943); Conover v. Hall, 111 Cal. 3d 842 , 523 P. 2d 682 , 114 Cal. Rptr. 642 (1974); Ackerman v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.